SSR 60-21. FACT AND DATE OF DEATH -- DEATH BY DROWNING
FederalRulings
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Social Security Rulings › OASI › Evidence, Procedure, and Certification for Payment › SSR 60-21
Text
W filed application in June 1957 for mother's insurance benefits for
herself and child's benefits for her children on the social security
account of her husband, H, who had disappeared on May 15, 1957, and who,
she alleged, had perished in a boating accident.
Before he left home on May 15, 1957, H had told W that he was about to
make some business calls and then was going fishing. After visiting the
office of his employer, he attempted to rent a boat from X boat house in
order to go fishing on Lake Erie. The operator of the boat house refused
to rent him a boat because the Lake was rough, storm warnings having been
posted. When H became insistent, the operator of X boat house suggested he
try another boat house. A short time later, H did rent a small rowboat
with an outboard motor from another boat house. The operator of that boat
house had also advised H that it would be unsafe for him to go out of the
river and into the lake because of the dangerous weather conditions.
H failed to return. The boat was later located on Lake Erie about 5½
miles from the boat house. The bottom was scraped, the propeller of the
outboard motor was bent, the gas tank was empty, the boat was half full of
water, and H's fishing equipment was strewn about in the bottom of the
boat. An extensive investigation was conducted by the police, the U.S.
Coast Guard, and several insurance companies; however, no trace of H was
ever found.
Erie about 5½
miles from the boat house. The bottom was scraped, the propeller of the
outboard motor was bent, the gas tank was empty, the boat was half full of
water, and H's fishing equipment was strewn about in the bottom of the
boat. An extensive investigation was conducted by the police, the U.S.
Coast Guard, and several insurance companies; however, no trace of H was
ever found.
Since there was a total of about $32,000 in insurance payable upon H's
death, two of the four companies that insured H's life made an extensive
investigation into H's habits, background, health, and character. The
evidence they obtained indicated that H was a devoted husband and father
of three children, that on the day of H's disappearance, Lake Erie was
very rough and was running 3 foot swells, a 15 knot wind was blowing from
the northeast, storm warnings were up, and small craft had been advised
against going out into the lake. The four insurance companies paid the
total of approximately $32,000 on policies insuring H's life.
It is well established by court decisions that one who files a claim with
an administrative agency has the burden of establishing that the required
conditions of eligibility have been met.
Regulations No. 4, § 404.704 provides, among other things, that an
applicant for monthly benefits or a lump-sum death payment based upon the
wages and self-employment income of a deceased individual shall file
supporting evidence as to the death of such individual and as to the time
and place of such death. The same section further provides that this may
be in the nature of, among other things, a certified copy of a public
record of death or a statement of the funeral director or attending
physician, or similar evidence of death, and that when such evidence is
not available, other evidence of probative value may be acceptable
th of such individual and as to the time
and place of such death. The same section further provides that this may
be in the nature of, among other things, a certified copy of a public
record of death or a statement of the funeral director or attending
physician, or similar evidence of death, and that when such evidence is
not available, other evidence of probative value may be acceptable. Death
may be proved by evidence showing such facts and circumstances connected
with the absence of the individual as would reasonably warrant a
conclusion of death.
A finding that death occurred at or about the time of his disappearance
may be reasonable where the individual was exposed to some specific peril
at or about the time of his disappearance, or in other cases where the
evidence shows convincingly that it was improbable, under all the
circumstances, that the missing individual survived long after his
disappearance. In such cases, consideration must be given to the missing
individual's domestic situation, his finances, his health, his mental
outlook, whether he was bound by ties of affection to his family and had
no apparent reason for leaving them, and whether he probably would have
communicated with them had he long survived.
It appears to be well established that H was a devoted husband and
father; that he was in good health; that he had no serious or unusual
financial worries; that he left home in good spirits to attend a business
matter with the announced intention of going on a fishing trip after he
had attended to the business matter; that, in spite of being warned about
the dangerous boating conditions, he did embark upon his fishing
expedition; and that his battered boat was found the next day in Lake Erie
unoccupied by H.
or unusual
financial worries; that he left home in good spirits to attend a business
matter with the announced intention of going on a fishing trip after he
had attended to the business matter; that, in spite of being warned about
the dangerous boating conditions, he did embark upon his fishing
expedition; and that his battered boat was found the next day in Lake Erie
unoccupied by H.
An individual operating a small boat in defiance of warnings from those
familiar with both the lake and the weather conditions was in a position
of potential peril. These circumstances lead to the reasonable conclusion
that H was tossed out of the boat by the heavy weather and thus met his
death by drowning. There is nothing to indicate any motive for H's
voluntary disappearance, but on the other hand, the evidence supports the
conclusion that H met his death on the day of his disappearance. Under
these circumstances, it is held that the evidence submitted
concerning the circumstances surrounding H's disappearance justifies a
finding that H died on May 15, 1957.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.