Rule 35. Costs
AlabamaCourt rules
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Alabama Rules of Court › Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure › Ala. R. App. P. 35
Text
Alabama Rules of Appellate Procedure
Rule 35.
Costs.
(a)
Against whom taxed. Except as otherwise provided by law, if an
appeal is dismissed, costs shall be taxed against the appellant, unless otherwise
agreed by the parties or ordered by the court; if a judgment is affirmed, costs shall
be taxed against the appellant unless otherwise ordered; if a judgment is reversed,
costs shall be taxed against the appellee unless otherwise ordered; if a judgment
is affirmed or reversed in part, or is vacated, costs shall be taxed only as ordered
by the court.
(b)
Costs for and against the State of Alabama. In cases involving the
State of Alabama or an agency or officer thereof, if an award of costs against the
State of Alabama is authorized by law, costs shall be awarded in accordance with
the provisions of subdivision (a); otherwise, costs shall not be awarded for or
against the State of Alabama.
(c)
Costs of copies of records. The costs of producing the necessary
copies of the clerk’s record and the reporter’s transcript shall be taxable in the trial
court. A party who desires those costs to be taxed shall state the costs in an
itemized and verified bill of costs, which the party shall file with the clerk of the trial
court, with proof of service, within 14 days (2 weeks) after the issuance of the
certificate of judgment pursuant to Rule 41.
[Amended 8-27-91, eff. 10-1-91; Amended 11-19-96, eff. 1-1-97; Amended eff. 81-
2000.]
Committee Comments
Rule 35 does not change the fundamental proposition that costs are taxed
in one of two ways: (1) in the event of a clear-cut decision, costs are taxed against
the loser; (2) in the event of any other type of decision, costs are taxed as ordered
by the court. Subdivision (c) is in accord with former Alabama practice of taxing the
costs of preparing the original record and transcript of testimony in the trial court
nge the fundamental proposition that costs are taxed
in one of two ways: (1) in the event of a clear-cut decision, costs are taxed against
the loser; (2) in the event of any other type of decision, costs are taxed as ordered
by the court. Subdivision (c) is in accord with former Alabama practice of taxing the
costs of preparing the original record and transcript of testimony in the trial court.
Under this rule, costs of producing the appendix are taxable as costs in the
appellate court and would appear as part of the certificate of judgment. The
purpose of the 14-day rule is to permit the clerk to include costs in his certificate of
judgment which issues on the eighteenth day in accordance with Rule 41. As noted
under Rule 41, the purpose of the issuance of the certificate on the eighteenth day
following the rendering of the decision is to allow for the expiration of the 14 days
permitted for application for rehearing.
The rule provides for the taxing of the costs of preparing the appendix which
corresponds to the former practice of taxing the cost of the transcript, but does not
provide for taxing the costs of briefs. Some state systems and the federal system
permit the taxing of the cost of preparing and printing briefs, but this has not been
included. It is thought that briefs will typically be produced under these rules by
photocopy or mimeograph, and not by commercial printing, and that these ordinary
costs of briefs should be borne by each party.
The term “mandate” has been eliminated to conform with Alabama practice.
Alabama presently has few statutes permitting the taxing of costs against
the State, but since the State is a party in very little civil litigation of a private nature,
this is not a major item. The advisory committee felt that it would require an act of
the Legislature to permit costs to be taxed against the State in ordinary civil or
criminal litigation as is done with 28 U.S.C. § 2412
e.
Alabama presently has few statutes permitting the taxing of costs against
the State, but since the State is a party in very little civil litigation of a private nature,
this is not a major item. The advisory committee felt that it would require an act of
the Legislature to permit costs to be taxed against the State in ordinary civil or
criminal litigation as is done with 28 U.S.C. § 2412. On taxing costs against the
State, see e.g., Code of Ala., § 18-1-31; State v. Jefferson County Bd. of Education,
282 Ala. 303, 211 So.2d 146. Also, costs may not be taxed in favor of the State
except as provided by statute.
Court Comment to Amendment
Effective October 1, 1991
This amendment omitted references to the appendix system, in the record.
Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 35(c)
Effective January 1, 1997
The amendment to Rule 35(c) removes gender specific pronouns.
Court Comment to Amendment to Rule 35
Effective September 1, 2000
The amendment makes it clear that the bill of costs is to be filed with the
clerk of the trial court and changes the date for filing that bill of costs to within 14
days after the issuance of the certificate of judgment rather than after the issuance
of an opinion or a ruling on an application for rehearing.
The amendment also deletes subsection (d), which required the clerk to
prepare an itemized statement of costs taxed in the appellate court and to insert
that statement into the certificate of judgment.
Note from the reporter of decisions: The order amending Rule 35,
effective September 1, 2000, is published in that volume of Alabama Reporter that
contains Alabama cases from 753 So.2d.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.