Actions Which Require the Attention of a Primary Examiner

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

USPTO MPEP › Chapter 1000 - Matters Decided by Various U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Officials › MPEP § 1004

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

Existing practice requires the primary examiner to be personally

responsible for the following actions:

1. Allowances (

MPEP § 1302.13

).

2. Examiner’s amendments (

MPEP § 1302.04

).

3. Quayle actions (

MPEP § 714.14

).

4. Final rejections (

MPEP § 706.07

).

5. Final Office actions containing a final requirement for

restriction (

MPEP §

803.01

).

6. Withdrawal of final rejection (

MPEP §§ 706.07(d)

and

706.07(e)

).

7. Actions on amendments submitted after final rejection

(

MPEP §

714.12

).

8. All examiner’s answers on appeal (

MPEP § 1207

).

9. Actions reopening prosecution (

MPEP § 1214.07

).

10. Entry of amendments under

37 CFR 1.312

that are

directed merely to formal matters or the cancellation of claims (

MPEP § 714.16

).

11. Rejection of a previously allowed claim (

MPEP § 706.04

).

12. Holding of abandonment for insufficient reply (

MPEP § 711.03(a)

).

13. Decision on affidavits or declarations (for example, under

37 CFR

1.130(a)

(

MPEP § 717.01(a) et seq.

),

37 CFR 1.130(b)

(

MPEP § 717.01(b) et

seq.

),

37 CFR 1.131(a)

(

MPEP § 715.08

),

37 CFR

1.131(c)

(

MPEP § 718

), or

37 CFR 1.132

(

MPEP §

716

)).

14. First request for suspension of examiner’s action

(

MPEP §

709

).

15. Decision on reissue oath or declaration (

MPEP § 1414

).

16. International Preliminary Examination Reports (

MPEP § 1879

).

17. Classification of allowed cases (

MPEP § 903.07

).

18. Treatment of newly filed application which obviously fails to comply

with

35 U.S.C.

112

(

MPEP § 702.01

).

19. Consideration of the advisability of a patentability report

(

MPEP §

705.01(a)

).

20. Requests filed prior to September 16, 2012 under 37 CFR 1.48 for

correction of inventorship or to accept amendments, statements, or oaths or declarations

under 37 CFR 1.48 (See MPEP § 602.01(c)(3) in Revision 08.2017 of the Ninth Edition of the

MPEP, published in January 2018).

21. Actions suggesting claims for interference purposes

(

MPEP §§

2304.04

,

2304.04(b)

)

report

(

MPEP §

705.01(a)

).

20. Requests filed prior to September 16, 2012 under 37 CFR 1.48 for

correction of inventorship or to accept amendments, statements, or oaths or declarations

under 37 CFR 1.48 (See MPEP § 602.01(c)(3) in Revision 08.2017 of the Ninth Edition of the

MPEP, published in January 2018).

21. Actions suggesting claims for interference purposes

(

MPEP §§

2304.04

,

2304.04(b)

). Note that the examiner should

consult with a Technology Center Practice Specialist (TCPS),

MPEP § 2304.04

.

22. Actions involving copied patent claims

(

MPEP §

2304.04(b)

.

23. Suggesting an interference (

MPEP § 2304.04

).

24. Calling Administrative Patent Judge’s attention to a discovered

reference which makes a claim corresponding to a count unpatentable.

For matters decided by supervisory patent examiners, see

MPEP §

1002.02(d)

.

For a list of actions that are to be submitted to the Technology Center

Directors, see

MPEP

§§ 1002.02(c)

and

1003

.

[top]

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.