Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fishery; Regulatory Adjustment
FederalRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Federal Register › Vol. 64 › 64 FR 44885
Text
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 990811217-9217-01; I.D. 061899A]
RIN 0648-AM82
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Atlantic Bluefin
Tuna Fishery; Regulatory Adjustment
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public hearings; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes to amend the regulations governing the Atlantic
highly migratory species (HMS) fisheries to remove the 250 metric ton
(mt) limit on allocating Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) landings quota to
the Purse Seine category. Without this restriction, the annual
allocation of BFT to the Purse Seine category would be 18.6 percent of
the total landings quota available to the United States. The proposed
regulatory amendments are necessary to achieve domestic management
objectives for HMS fisheries. NMFS received extensive comment on this
issue during the comment period for the rule to implement the Fishery
Management Plan for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, and Sharks (FMP) and
during a recent meeting of the HMS Advisory Panel (AP). However, NMFS
will hold two public hearings to receive additional comments from
fishery participants and other members of the public regarding these
proposed amendments.
DATES: Comments are invited and must be received on or before September
27, 1999. The public hearings dates are:
1. Wednesday, September 1, 1999, 3:30-6:00 p.m. in Silver Spring,
MD.
2. Tuesday, September 7, 1999, 7:00-9:00 p.m. in Fairhaven, MA.
two public hearings to receive additional comments from
fishery participants and other members of the public regarding these
proposed amendments.
DATES: Comments are invited and must be received on or before September
27, 1999. The public hearings dates are:
1. Wednesday, September 1, 1999, 3:30-6:00 p.m. in Silver Spring,
MD.
2. Tuesday, September 7, 1999, 7:00-9:00 p.m. in Fairhaven, MA.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed rule should be sent to, Rebecca
Lent, Chief, Highly Migratory Species Management Division (F/SF1),
NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282. Copies of
supporting documents, including a Draft Environmental Assessment (EA),
which includes a Draft Regulatory Impact Review (RIR), are available
from Pat Scida, Highly Migratory Species Management Division, Northeast
Regional Office, NMFS, One Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930.
The public hearing locations are:
1. Silver Spring (Wednesday, September 1, 1999), NMFS, SSMC III -
Room 4527, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
2. Fairhaven (Tuesday, September 7, 1999), Seaport Inn, 110 Middle
Street, Fairhaven, MA 02719.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Murray-Brown, 978-281-9260.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic tunas are managed under the dual
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act
(ATCA). ATCA authorizes the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) to
implement binding recommendations of the International Commission for
the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The authority to issue
regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and ATCA has been delegated
from the Secretary to the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA). Within NMFS, daily responsibility for management of Atlantic HMS
fisheries rests with the Office of Sustainable Fisheries, and is
administered by the HMS Management Division.
Background
onservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT). The authority to issue
regulations under the Magnuson-Stevens Act and ATCA has been delegated
from the Secretary to the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA
(AA). Within NMFS, daily responsibility for management of Atlantic HMS
fisheries rests with the Office of Sustainable Fisheries, and is
administered by the HMS Management Division.
Background
Based on the 1998 revised stock assessment, parties at the 1998
meeting of ICCAT adopted a 20-year west Atlantic BFT rebuilding
program, beginning in 1999 and continuing through 2018. ICCAT has
adopted an annual total allowable catch (TAC) for western Atlantic BFT
of 2,500 mt whole weight (ww), inclusive of dead discards, to be
applied annually until such time as the TAC is changed based on advice
from the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics. The annual
landing quota allocated to the United States was set at 1,387 mt ww.
Regulations at 50 CFR 635.27 subdivide the U.S. BFT quota recommended
by ICCAT among the various domestic fishing categories.
On May 28, 1999, NMFS published in the Federal Register (64 FR
29090) final regulations, effective July 1, 1999, implementing the HMS
FMP that was adopted and made available to the public in April 1999.
The HMS FMP and the implementing regulations established percentage
quota shares for the ICCAT-recommended U.S. BFT landing quota for each
of the domestic fishing categories. These percentage shares were based
on historical allocations as had been adjusted in recent years. In the
final rule, NMFS adopted a limit (cap) on the amount of the annual
quota that would be
landings quota available to the U.S. in 1999. NMFS therefore stated in
the HMS FMP that, after later consultation with the HMS AP, the purse
seine cap could be adjusted by regulatory amendment under the framework
provisions of the FMP. Pending that consultation with the HMS AP, NMFS
proceeded to issue final BFT quota specifications for the 1999 fishing
year.
Purse Seine Quota Specification
The ICCAT-recommended 1999 U.S. BFT landings quota is 1,387 mt,
18.6 percent of which is 258 mt, or 8 mt over the cap. NMFS indicated
in the HMS FMP that the additional 8 mt would be held in reserve until
after the AP had discussed the issue. Thus, under the regulatory cap,
the Purse Seine category was initially allocated a 250 mt BFT landings
quota for 1999, and the additional 8 mt were allocated to the Reserve
category. Given the regulatory provisions for interannual adjustments,
an additional 2 mt Purse Seine category quota that was not harvested in
1998 was added to the category's quota for 1999, for an adjusted Purse
Seine category quota of 252 mt (64 FR 29806, June 3, 1999).
The AP met in Silver Spring, MD on June 10 and June 11, 1999, and
discussed, among other things, the Purse Seine category cap. After
extensive discussion, a majority favored removal of the cap. The AP
provided information and advice to NMFS on the issue of fairness in the
context of allocation to the Purse Seine category. Among the points
used by the AP in support of removing the cap were the following: (1) a
cap on one category and not on others is not fair and equitable, (2) a
cap on the only category in the fishery which is managed under limited
access does not promote the objectives of limited access management
systems, and (3) retention of a cap on the Purse Seine category's BFT
quota allocation may cause purse seine vessels to increase fishing
effort on yellowfin tuna, which is an important commercial and
recreational species for vessels in other Atlantic tunas permit
categories, and for which there is an ICCAT r
ed under limited
access does not promote the objectives of limited access management
systems, and (3) retention of a cap on the Purse Seine category's BFT
quota allocation may cause purse seine vessels to increase fishing
effort on yellowfin tuna, which is an important commercial and
recreational species for vessels in other Atlantic tunas permit
categories, and for which there is an ICCAT recommendation in place to
limit effective fishing effort.
After considering the input from the HMS AP, NMFS transferred 8 mt
of BFT quota from the Reserve to the Purse Seine category (64 FR 36818,
July 8, 1999) for the 1999 fishing year. As a result of this transfer,
the adjusted Purse Seine category quota for 1999 is 260 mt.
Proposed Management Measure
In addition to its commitment to considering the AP's advice on
this issue, as stated in the FMP and its implementing regulations, NMFS
is concerned that Purse Seine category vessels may increase fishing
effort on yellowfin tuna if the cap is retained. As mentioned earlier,
yellowfin tuna is an important commercial and recreational species for
vessels in other Atlantic tunas permit categories, and for which there
is an ICCAT recommendation in place to limit effective fishing effort.
As yellowfin tuna is considered a fully-exploited species, and the
latest ICCAT Standing Committee on Research and Statistics report
indicates that the current fishing mortality may be higher than that
which would support maximum sustainable yield on a continuing basis,
any additional fishing effort directed at yellowfin tuna could have
adverse impacts on optimum yield in that fishery.
Removing the cap on the Purse Seine category is also consistent
with the Magnuson-Stevens Act in that it contributes to the goal of
allocating restrictions needed to prevent overfishing and recovery
benefits from rebuilding fairly and equitably among sectors of the
fishery, in that no one quota category would be restricted in its
allocation while others would not
timum yield in that fishery.
Removing the cap on the Purse Seine category is also consistent
with the Magnuson-Stevens Act in that it contributes to the goal of
allocating restrictions needed to prevent overfishing and recovery
benefits from rebuilding fairly and equitably among sectors of the
fishery, in that no one quota category would be restricted in its
allocation while others would not. It is also consistent with the
objectives of the FMP to preserve traditional fisheries and historical
fishing patterns, in the fact that the Purse Seine fishery is a
historical component of the overall U.S. Atlantic BFT fishery,
participating in the fishery since the 1950's.
NMFS proposes this action to remove the purse seine allocation cap
under the framework provisions described in the FMP. NMFS believes that
the allocation of a percentage of the BFT landings quota, without a
cap, is consistent with management measures in the FMP, and is an
appropriate regulatory action in order to meet the goals and objectives
of the FMP.
After reviewing public comments and additional information or data
that may be available, NMFS will, if appropriate, make final
determinations regarding the consistency of this proposed measure with
the objectives of the FMP, the national standards of the Magnuson-
Stevens Act, and other applicable law.
Technical Correction
When NMFS first established a limited access and individual vessel
allocation system for the Purse Seine category, the vessel allocations
were made transferable. Initially, the allocations were transferable in
whole, but in subsequent rulemaking, the allocations were made
transferable in whole or in part (61 FR 30187, June 14, 1996). The
allowance for partial transfers was made to reduce bycatch mortality
during the last few sets as vessels approached the limits of individual
allocations
Seine category, the vessel allocations
were made transferable. Initially, the allocations were transferable in
whole, but in subsequent rulemaking, the allocations were made
transferable in whole or in part (61 FR 30187, June 14, 1996). The
allowance for partial transfers was made to reduce bycatch mortality
during the last few sets as vessels approached the limits of individual
allocations. In the final consolidated rule to implement the HMS FMP,
NMFS inadvertently reissued the older procedures for notification of
transfer of the entire allocation from one permitted purse seine vessel
to another, omitting the newer procedures for notification of partial
transfers. The proposed rule would reinstate updated notification
procedures for transfers.
Public Hearings and Special Accommodations
The public hearing sites are physically accessible to people with
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other
auxiliary aids should be directed to Mark Murray-Brown (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) at least 7 days prior to the hearing.
The public is reminded that NMFS expects participants at the public
hearings to conduct themselves appropriately. At the beginning of each
public hearing, a NMFS representative will explain the ground rules
(e.g., alcohol is prohibited from the hearing room, attendees will be
called to give their comments in the order in which they registered to
speak, each attendee will have an equal amount of time to speak,
attendees should not interrupt one another). The NMFS representative
will attempt to structure the hearing so that all attending members of
the public are able to comment, if they so choose, regardless of the
controversiality of the subject(s). Attendees are expected to respect
the ground rules, and if they do not, they will be asked to leave the
hearing.
Classification
nt of time to speak,
attendees should not interrupt one another). The NMFS representative
will attempt to structure the hearing so that all attending members of
the public are able to comment, if they so choose, regardless of the
controversiality of the subject(s). Attendees are expected to respect
the ground rules, and if they do not, they will be asked to leave the
hearing.
Classification
This proposed rule is published under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas
Convention Act, 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. Preliminarily, the AA has
determined that the regulations contained in this proposed rule are
consistent with the FMP, the Magnuson-Stevens Act, and the 1998 ICCAT
recommendation (ICCAT Rebuilding Program).
NMFS prepared a draft EA for this proposed rule with a preliminary
finding of no significant impact on the human environment. In addition,
a draft RIR was prepared with a preliminary finding of no significant
impact. The reasons this action is being considered and the objectives
of, and legal basis for, the proposed rule are as stated in the
preamble here. There are no relevant Federal rules which duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with the proposed rule. NMFS considered
alternatives to the preferred alternative, including: no action
(maintaining cap of 250 mt for the Purse Seine category), removal of
the cap on the Purse Seine category, and reduction of the Purse Seine
category percentage share allocation by 50 percent.
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection-of-information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
This proposed rule restates an information collection requirement
relating to purse seine landings quota allocations
l any person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with, a collection-of-information subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number.
This proposed rule restates an information collection requirement
relating to purse seine landings quota allocations. Written requests
for purse seine allocations for Atlantic tunas and notification of
transfers as required under Sec. 635.27 are not currently approved by
OMB. However, requests for purse seine allocations and transfer
notifications are not subject to the PRA because, under current
regulations, a maximum of five vessels could be subject to reporting
under this requirement. Since it is impossible for 10 or more
respondents to be involved, the information collection is exempt from
the PRA clearance requirement.
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration that the proposed rule, if implemented, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as follows:
The proposed rule would remove the 250 metric ton (mt) maximum
allocation restriction (cap) on the Purse Seine fishery for Atlantic
bluefin tuna (BFT), establishing the Purse Seine category BFT quota
allocation at 18.6 percent of the overall U.S. BFT landings quota
(1,347 metric tons for 1999). Because the overall U.S. BFT landings
quota would remain the same, and the amount of BFT quota that would
be allocated to the Purse Seine category through this proposed
action (8 metric tons) was previously allocated to the Reserve, and
not to any particular fishing category, additional revenues would
accrue to small businesses associated with the purse seine fishery
without directly affecting other fishing categories.
landings
quota would remain the same, and the amount of BFT quota that would
be allocated to the Purse Seine category through this proposed
action (8 metric tons) was previously allocated to the Reserve, and
not to any particular fishing category, additional revenues would
accrue to small businesses associated with the purse seine fishery
without directly affecting other fishing categories.
Because of this certification, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis was not prepared.
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of E.O. 12866.
NMFS initiated formal consultation on the HMS and billfish
fisheries on May 12, 1998. The consultation request concerned the
possible effects of management measures in the HMS FMP and Billfish
Amendment. On April 23, 1999, NMFS issued a Biological Opinion (BO)
under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. The BO applies to the
Atlantic pelagic fisheries for tunas, sharks, swordfish, and billfish.
The BFT purse seine fishery is currently listed as a category III
fisheries under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. This fishery was
observed in 1996, with near 100-percent coverage. Six pilot whales, one
humpback whale, and one minke whale were observed as encircled by the
nets during the fishery. All were released alive or dove under the nets
and escaped before being pursed. Purse seines are set when a school of
fish is located, after which the vessel pays out the net in a circle
around the school. This affords considerable control over what is
encircled by the net and the net does not remain in the water for any
considerable amount of time. Therefore, this gear-type is not likely to
result in mortality or serious injury of marine mammals or sea turtles
g pursed. Purse seines are set when a school of
fish is located, after which the vessel pays out the net in a circle
around the school. This affords considerable control over what is
encircled by the net and the net does not remain in the water for any
considerable amount of time. Therefore, this gear-type is not likely to
result in mortality or serious injury of marine mammals or sea turtles.
The BO states that after reviewing the current status of the
subject species, the environmental baseline for the action area, the
effects of the continued operation of the Atlantic HMS fisheries and
associated management actions, and the cumulative effects, it is NMFS'
BO that the continued operation of the purse seine fishery may
adversely affect, but is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or threatened species under NMFS
jurisdiction. A similar conclusion was reached for the other fisheries
which are allocated BFT quota - the Atlantic pelagic longline fishery
and the harpoon, hand gear, and rod and reel fisheries for Atlantic
HMS.
This proposed rule would remove the 250 mt cap on the annual Purse
Seine category BFT quota allocation. Because the only fisheries which
may be affected by this proposed rule are Category III fisheries, the
proposed rule is not expected to increase endangered species or marine
mammal interaction rates.
The area in which this proposed action is planned has been
identified as essential fish habitat (EFH) for species managed by the
New England Fishery Management Council, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council and the Highly Migratory Species Division of NMFS.
It is not anticipated that this action will have any adverse impacts to
EFH and therefore no consultation is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Treaties.
FH) for species managed by the
New England Fishery Management Council, the Mid-Atlantic Fishery
Management Council and the Highly Migratory Species Division of NMFS.
It is not anticipated that this action will have any adverse impacts to
EFH and therefore no consultation is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Treaties.
Dated: August 12, 1999.
Andrew A. Rosenberg,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. and 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In Sec. 635.27, introductory paragraph (a) and paragraphs
(a)(4)(i) and (iii) are revised to read as follows:
Sec. 635.27 Quotas.
(a) BFT. Consistent with ICCAT recommendations, NMFS will subtract
any allowance for dead discards from the fishing year's total U.S.
quota for BFT that can be caught and allocate the remainder to be
retained, possessed, or landed by persons and vessels subject to U.S.
jurisdiction. The total landing quota will be divided among the
General, Angling, Harpoon, Purse Seine, Longline, and Trap categories.
Consistent with these allocations and other applicable restrictions of
this part, BFT may be taken by persons aboard vessels issued Atlantic
Tunas permits or HMS Charter/Headboat permits. Allocations of the BFT
landings quota will be made according to the following percentages:
General - 47.1 percent; Angling - 19.7 percent, which includes
Harpoon, Purse Seine, Longline, and Trap categories.
Consistent with these allocations and other applicable restrictions of
this part, BFT may be taken by persons aboard vessels issued Atlantic
Tunas permits or HMS Charter/Headboat permits. Allocations of the BFT
landings quota will be made according to the following percentages:
General - 47.1 percent; Angling - 19.7 percent, which includes
the school BFT held in reserve as described under paragraph (a)(7)(ii)
of this section; Harpoon - 3.9 percent; Purse Seine - 18.6 percent;
Longline - 8.1 percent; and Trap - 0.1 percent. The remaining 2.5
percent of the BFT landings quota will be held in reserve for inseason
adjustments, to compensate for overharvest in any category other than
the Angling category school BFT subquota or for fishery independent
research. NMFS may apportion a landings quota allocated to any category
to specified fishing periods or to geographic areas. BFT landings
quotas are specified in whole weight.
* * * * *
(4) Purse Seine category quota. (i) The total amount of large
medium and giant BFT that may be caught, retained, possessed, or landed
by vessels for which Purse Seine category Atlantic Tunas permits have
been issued is 18.6 percent of the overall U.S. BFT landings quota. The
Purse Seine fishery under this quota commences on August 15 each year.
* * * * *
(iii) On or about May 1, NMFS will make equal allocations of the
available size classes of BFT among purse seine vessel permit holders
so requesting. Such allocations are freely transferable, in whole or in
part, among vessels that have Purse Seine category Atlantic Tunas
permits. Any purse seine vessel permit holder intending to land bluefin
tuna under an allocation transferred from another purse seine vessel
permit holder must provide written notice of such intent to NMFS, at an
address designated by NMFS, 3 days before landing any such bluefin
tuna
ons are freely transferable, in whole or in
part, among vessels that have Purse Seine category Atlantic Tunas
permits. Any purse seine vessel permit holder intending to land bluefin
tuna under an allocation transferred from another purse seine vessel
permit holder must provide written notice of such intent to NMFS, at an
address designated by NMFS, 3 days before landing any such bluefin
tuna. Such notification must include the transfer date, amount (mt)
transferred, and the permit numbers of vessels involved in the
transfer. Trip or seasonal catch limits otherwise applicable under
Sec. 635.23(e) are not altered by transfers of bluefin tuna allocation.
Purse seine vessel permit holders who, through landing and/or transfer,
have no remaining bluefin tuna allocation may not use their permitted
vessels in any fishery in which Atlantic bluefin tuna might be caught,
regardless of whether retained.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 99-21344 Filed 8-12-99; 3:18 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.