Kentucky Regulatory Program

FederalRegulations

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Federal Register › Vol. 62 › 62 FR 65044

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement

30 CFR Part 917

[KY-217-FOR]

Kentucky Regulatory Program

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),

Interior.

ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public

hearing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSM is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the

Kentucky regulatory program (hereinafter the ``Kentucky program'')

under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA).

Kentucky submitted a letter requesting the removal of an amendment at

30 CFR 917.17(a) which required that it maintain a staffing level of

156 field inspectors and, in the same letter, provided justification

for its request. The amendment is intended to revise the Kentucky

program to be consistent with the corresponding Federal regulations.

DATES: Written comments must be received by 4:00 p.m., [E.S.T.],

January 9, 1998. If requested, a public hearing on the proposed

amendment will be held on January 5, 1998. Requests to speak at the

hearing must be received by 4:00 p.m., [E.S.T.], on December 29, 1997.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and requests to speak at the hearing should

be mailed or hand delivered to William J. Kovacic, Director, at the

address listed below.

Copies of the Kentucky program, the proposed amendment, a listing

of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments received in

response to this document will be available for public review at the

addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through

Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may receive one free copy of

the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's Lexington Field Office.

William J. Kovacic, Director, Lexington Field Office, Office of Surface

Mining Reclamation Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road, Lexington, Kentucky

40503. Telephone: (606) 233-2896

eview at the

addresses listed below during normal business hours, Monday through

Friday, excluding holidays. Each requester may receive one free copy of

the proposed amendment by contacting OSM's Lexington Field Office.

William J. Kovacic, Director, Lexington Field Office, Office of Surface

Mining Reclamation Enforcement, 2675 Regency Road, Lexington, Kentucky

40503. Telephone: (606) 233-2896.

Department of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 2 Hudson

Hollow Complex, Frankfort, Kentucky 40601, Telephone: (502) 564-6940.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William J. Kovacic, Director,

Lexington Field Office, Telephone: (606) 233-2896.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background on the Kentucky Program

On May 18, 1982, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally

approved the Kentucky program. Background information on the Kentucky

program, including the Secretary's findings, the disposition of

comments, and the conditions of approval can be found in the May 18,

1982, Federal Register (47 FR 21404). Subsequent actions concerning the

conditions of approval and program amendments can be found at 30 CFR

917.11, 917.13, 917.15, 917.16, and 917.17.

II. Description of the Proposed Amendment

By letter dated November 3, 1997 (Administrative Record No. KY-

1418), Kentucky submitted a proposed amendment to its program

requesting the removal of an amendment at 30 CFR 917.17(a) requiring

that Kentucky maintain a staffing level of 156 field inspectors. In the

same letter, Kentucky provided the following justification for its

request:

1. Field inspector staffing levels are no longer based on 1984

inspection numbers and budgetary needs.

2. A study performed during the National Wildlife Federation

Settlement Agreement determined that a cap of 24 inspectable units per

field inspector should be established.

3. OSM has accepted the limits set by the study in determining

inspection staff levels as indicated by the approval of Title V

administrative and enforcement grants.

4

based on 1984

inspection numbers and budgetary needs.

2. A study performed during the National Wildlife Federation

Settlement Agreement determined that a cap of 24 inspectable units per

field inspector should be established.

3. OSM has accepted the limits set by the study in determining

inspection staff levels as indicated by the approval of Title V

administrative and enforcement grants.

4. OSM's annual reports indicate that Kentucky's Title V regulatory

program consistently meets high inspection frequency levels.

Kentucky also maintains that using a fixed number of field

inspectors fails to provide the latitude necessary to adapt its

inspection force to changing conditions in the coal industry. Further,

the number of inspectors Kentucky maintains is based on the current and

ever-changing number of inspectable units.

III. Public Comment Procedures

In accordance with the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), OSM is

seeking comments on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the

applicable program approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If the amendment

is deemed adequate, it will become part of the Kentucky program.

Written Comments

Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues

proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the

commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated

under ``DATES'' or at locations other than the Lexington Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included

in the Administrative Record.

Public Hearing

Written comments should be specific, pertain only to the issues

proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in support of the

commenter's recommendations. Comments received after the time indicated

under ``DATES'' or at locations other than the Lexington Field Office

will not necessarily be considered in the final rulemaking or included

in the Administrative Record.

Public Hearing

Persons wishing to speak at the public hearing should contact the

person listed under ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' by 4:00 p.m.,

[E.S.T.] on December 29, 1997. The location and time of the hearing

will be arranged with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one

requests an opportunity to speak at the public hearing, the hearing

will not be held.

Filing of a written statement at the time of the hearing is

requested as it will greatly assist the transcriber. Submission of

written statements in advance of the hearing will allow OSM officials

to prepare adequate responses and appropriate questions.

The public hearing will continue on the specified date until all

persons scheduled to speak have been heard. Persons in the audience who

have not been scheduled to speak, and who wish to do so, will be heard

following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end after all

persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish

to speak have been heard.

Any disabled individual who has need for a special accommodation to

attend a public hearing should contact the individual listed under

``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.''

Public Meeting

and who wish to do so, will be heard

following those who have been scheduled. The hearing will end after all

persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish

to speak have been heard.

Any disabled individual who has need for a special accommodation to

attend a public hearing should contact the individual listed under

``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.''

Public Meeting

If only one person requests an opportunity to speak at a hearing, a

public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be held. Persons

wishing to meet with OSM representatives to discuss the proposed

amendment may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under

``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.'' All such meetings will be open to

the public and, if possible, notices of meetings will be posted at the

locations listed under ``ADDRESSES.'' A written summary of each meeting

will be made a part of the Administrative Record.

IV. Procedural Determinations

Executive Order 12866

This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and

Review).

Executive Order 12988

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required

by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that,to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the

applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.

However, these standards

and

Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and

Review).

Executive Order 12988

The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required

by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform) and has

determined that,to the extent allowed by law, this rule meets the

applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that section.

However, these standards

are not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs

and program amendments since each such program is drafted and

promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505

of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and

732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and

program amendments submitted by the States must be based solely on a

determination of whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its

implementing Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of

30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have been met.

National Environmental Policy Act

No environmental impact statement is required for this rule since

section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency

decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not

constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)),

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

roposed State regulatory program provisions do not

constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section

102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.

4332(2)(C)),

Paperwork Reduction Act

This rule does not contain information collection requirements that

require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.

3507 et seq.).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will

not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).

The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon

counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was

prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a

significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small

entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements

previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In

making the determination as to whether this rule would have a

significant economic impact, the department relied upon the data and

assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.

Unfunded Mandates

This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any

given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 917

Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.

Dated: December 2, 1997.

Michael K. Robinson,

Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center.

[FR Doc. 97-32222 Filed 12-9-97; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-05-M

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Kentucky Regulatory Program · 62 FR 65044 | Frix