Appropriateness of Requested Single Location Bargaining Units in Representation Cases
FederalRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Federal Register › Vol. 61 › 61 FR 1546
Text
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
29 CFR Part 103
Appropriateness of Requested Single Location Bargaining Units in
Representation Cases
AGENCY: National Labor Relations Board.
ACTION: Notice of extension of time for filing comments to proposed
rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Labor Relations Board gives notice that it is
extending the time for filing comments on the proposed rulemaking on
the appropriateness of requested single location bargaining units in
representation cases.
DATES: The comment period which presently ends at the close of business
on January 22, 1996, is extended to the close of business on February
8, 1996.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposed rulemaking should be sent to:
Office of the Executive Secretary, 1099 14th Street NW., Room 11600,
Washington, DC 20570.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
John J. Toner, Executive Secretary, Telephone: (202) 273-1940.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board's notice of proposed rulemaking on
the appropriateness of requested single location bargaining units in
representation cases was published in the Federal Register on September
28, 1995 (60 FR 50146). The notice provided that all responses to the
notice of proposed rulemaking must be received on or before November
27, 1995. On November 20, 1995 the Board extended the time to January
22, 1996. In view of the recent shutdown of operations due to lack of
appropriated funds, the Board has decided to extend the period for
filing responses to the notice of proposed rulemaking until the close
of business on Thursday, February 8, 1996.
Dated, Washington, DC, January 17, 1996.
By direction of the Board.
John J. Toner,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 96-741 Filed 1-19-96; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545-01-M
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.