Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding
FederalRegulations
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
Federal Register › Vol. 83 › 83 FR 13463
Text
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Parts 15, 73, 74, and 76 [GN Docket No. 16-142; Report No. 3088] Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding AGENCY:
Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION:
Petitions for Reconsideration.
SUMMARY:
Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding by Rick Chessen, on behalf of NCTA—The Internet & Television Association (“NCTA”) and Michael Nilsson, on behalf of American Television Alliance (ATVA).
DATES:
Oppositions to the Petition must be filed on or before April 13, 2018. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before April 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES:
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Evan Baranoff, Media Bureau, Policy Division, at: (202) 418-2120; email: Evan.Baranoff@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
This is a summary of the Commission's document, Report No. 3088, released March 22, 2018. The full text of the Petition is available for viewing and http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5.U.S.C. because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
Subject: Authorizing Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard, Report and Order, FCC 17-158, published at 83 FR 4998, February 2, 2018, in GN Docket No. 16-142. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
Number of Petitions Filed: 2.
Federal Communications Commission. Katura Jackson, Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06372 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.