Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Seasonal Closure of Grammanik Bank

FederalRegulations

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

Federal Register › Vol. 69 › 69 FR 67104

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 622 [Docket No. 041104307-4307-01; I.D. 102904B] RIN 0648-AS56 Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands; Seasonal Closure of Grammanik Bank AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION:

Proposed rule; request for comments.

SUMMARY:

NMFS issues this proposed rule to implement interim measures recommended by the Caribbean Fishery Management Council (Council). This proposed rule would prohibit fishing for or possessing any species of fish, except highly migratory species, within the Grammanik Bank closed area from February 1, 2005, through April 30, 2005. The intended effect of this proposed rule is to protect a yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation and to reduce overfishing.

DATES:

Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., eastern time, on December 1, 2004.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments on the proposed rule by any of the following methods:

• E-mail: 0648-AS56.Proposed@noaa.gov . Include in the subject line of the e-mail comment the following document identifier 0648-AS56.

• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov . Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

• Mail: Michael Barnette, Southeast Regional Office, NMFS, 9721 Executive Center Drive N., St. Petersburg, FL 33702.

• Fax: 727-570-5583, Attention: Michael Barnette.

Copies of documents supporting this action may be obtained by contacting the NMFS Southeast Regional Office at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Barnette, 727-570-5794.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The reef fish fishery of Puerto Rico and of the U.S. Virgin Islands is managed under the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FMP)

orting this action may be obtained by contacting the NMFS Southeast Regional Office at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Michael Barnette, 727-570-5794.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The reef fish fishery of Puerto Rico and of the U.S. Virgin Islands is managed under the Fishery Management Plan for the Reef Fish Fishery of Puerto Rico and of the U.S. Virgin Islands (FMP). The FMP was prepared by the Council and is implemented under the authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) by regulations at 50 CFR part 622.

Background

Grammanik Bank lies on the shelf edge approximately 7 miles (11.3 km) south of Water Island, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. The actual coral bank extends 1.05 miles (1.69 km) along the shelf edge and is approximately 328 ft (100 m) wide at its widest point. Researchers at the University of the Virgin Islands have documented that yellowfin grouper aggregate to spawn on Grammanik Bank from February through April each year, with peak spawning occurring around the full moon in March.

Yellowfin grouper are a long-lived, slow-growing species and, therefore, have a higher susceptibility to overfishing. Based on the preferred stock status criteria alternatives contained in the Council's Draft Amendment to the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) of the U.S. Caribbean to Address Required Provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (SFA Amendment), yellowfin grouper would be considered to be undergoing overfishing, and the stock would be considered to be overfished.

Prior to 2000, the yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation appears to have been relatively unexploited

ent to the Fishery Management Plans (FMPs) of the U.S. Caribbean to Address Required Provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (SFA Amendment), yellowfin grouper would be considered to be undergoing overfishing, and the stock would be considered to be overfished.

Prior to 2000, the yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation appears to have been relatively unexploited. However, anecdotal information from fishermen indicates that significant quantities of

Interim Measures to Protect Yellowfin Grouper

This proposed rule would prohibit fishing for or possession of any species of fish, other than a highly migratory species, within the Grammanik Bank closed area from February 1, 2005, through April 30, 2005. For the purposes of this rule, the term “highly migratory species” means bluefin, bigeye, yellowfin, albacore, and skipjack tunas; swordfish; sharks (listed in appendix A to 50 CFR part 635); white marlin, blue marlin, sailfish, and longbill spearfish. The Grammanik Bank closed area encompasses an area approximately 2.5 nm (4.6 km) by 2.75 nm (5.1 km) and is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points:

Point North lat. West long. A 18°12.40′ 64°59.00′ B 18°10.00′ 64°59.00′ C 18°10.00′ 64°56.10′ D 18°12.40′ 64°56.10′ A 18°12.40′ 64°59.00′ Classification

At this time, NMFS has not determined that the interim measures that this proposed rule would implement are consistent with the national standards of the Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws. NMFS, in making that determination, will take into account the data, views, and comments received during the comment period on this proposed rule.

This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

NMFS prepared an EA for the interim measures that this proposed rule would implement. The EA discusses the impact on the environment as a result of this rule. A copy of the EA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES )

a, views, and comments received during the comment period on this proposed rule.

This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866.

NMFS prepared an EA for the interim measures that this proposed rule would implement. The EA discusses the impact on the environment as a result of this rule. A copy of the EA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES ).

NMFS prepared an initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) as required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA, which is contained in the EA, describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the preamble. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES ).

The proposed rule is intended to protect an important spawning aggregation of yellowfin grouper, to help arrest the decline in the resource, and to support its recovery. The Magnuson-Stevens Act, as amended, provides the statutory basis for the rule.

The proposed rule is intended to implement, on an interim basis, an action currently included in the Draft SFA Amendment. The SFA Amendment is expected to be implemented prior to the 2006 fishing year. This proposed rule would be an interim action providing protection of an important yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation during the 2005 spawning season and would expire prior to the implementation of the SFA Amendment. No duplicate, overlapping or conflicting rules have been identified.

There are two general classes of small business entities that would be directly affected by the rule: commercial fishing vessels and for-hire fishing vessels

viding protection of an important yellowfin grouper spawning aggregation during the 2005 spawning season and would expire prior to the implementation of the SFA Amendment. No duplicate, overlapping or conflicting rules have been identified.

There are two general classes of small business entities that would be directly affected by the rule: commercial fishing vessels and for-hire fishing vessels. The Small Business Administration defines a small business that engages in commercial fishing as a firm that is independently owned and operated, that is not dominant in its field of operation, and that has annual receipts up to $3.5 million per year. The revenue benchmark for a small business that engages in charter fishing is a firm with receipts up to $6.0 million.

There are an estimated 342 registered commercial fishing vessels in the U.S. Virgin Islands. The majority of participants are part-time fishermen. Total annual average dockside revenues from commercial fishing activity are estimated at $1.72 million, or an average of $5,000 per registered vessel. Given the average revenue estimates of the fleet, all commercial entities are determined to be small business entities. It cannot be precisely determined how many of the commercial vessels that operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands would be affected by the proposed rule, though the rule would apply to all commercial fishing vessels. NMFS assumes that indirect impacts would be incurred industry-wide, and that all the commercial fishing entities that would be affected by the rule are small entities.

An estimated 27 year-round charter fishing operations operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with an unknown number of seasonal operations. No information exists on the business profile of this fleet. However, the average gross revenue for charter vessels operating in Florida is estimated at $68,000, and ranges from $26,000 (South Carolina) to $82,000 (Alabama) for other areas in the southeastern U.S

An estimated 27 year-round charter fishing operations operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands, with an unknown number of seasonal operations. No information exists on the business profile of this fleet. However, the average gross revenue for charter vessels operating in Florida is estimated at $68,000, and ranges from $26,000 (South Carolina) to $82,000 (Alabama) for other areas in the southeastern U.S. No information exists to suggest that the revenue profile of charter vessels that operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands is substantially different from these estimates, so NMFS concludes that all charter vessels operating in the U.S. Virgin Islands are small business entities. It cannot be determined how many of the charter vessels that operate in the U.S. Virgin Islands would be affected by the proposed rule, though the rule would apply to all charter vessels. NMFS assumes that indirect effects would be incurred industry-wide, and that all the charter fishing entities that would be affected by the rule are small entities.

The rule does not impose any reporting or record keeping requirements.

Since the proposed rule would apply to all commercial and charter fishing entities and all entities operating in the fishery are assumed to be small entities,

The outcome of “significant economic impact” can be ascertained by examining two issues: disproportionality and profitability. The criterion for disproportionality is whether the regulations place a substantial number of small entities at a significant competitive disadvantage to large entities. All entities affected by the proposed rule are considered small entities so that the issue of disproportionality does not arise. The criterion regarding profitability is whether the regulations significantly reduce profit for a substantial number of small entities. No precise estimates of the profits of either the commercial fishing vessels or the charter vessels that are expected to be affected by the proposed rule are available

osed rule are considered small entities so that the issue of disproportionality does not arise. The criterion regarding profitability is whether the regulations significantly reduce profit for a substantial number of small entities. No precise estimates of the profits of either the commercial fishing vessels or the charter vessels that are expected to be affected by the proposed rule are available. However, even though it is recognized that not all water habitat is equally productive, the proposed rule would affect only approximately 3 percent of the available water area in the less than 100-fathom (183-m) depth range and close the area to fishing for only 25 percent of the year. Thus, less than 1 percent of available fishing area and time would be affected. Although it is likely that harvests from this area during this time period may exceed 1 percent by a negligible amount for certain species or fishing operations, the proposed restriction is expected to be sufficiently small so as to not substantially affect the profits of a substantial number of small entities.

Including the no-action alternative, five alternatives were considered in addition to the proposed rule. The no-action alternative would not impose any closure in the target area, thereby allowing all current fishing practices. This would eliminate all short-term adverse impacts expected to result from the closure. However, spawning protection of yellowfin grouper would not be provided, thereby forgoing the benefits of rebuilding the stock, and the action would, therefore, not be consistent with the Council's intent. The remaining four alternatives differ in the geographic size and time duration of the closure. Alternative 3 would establish closure over a larger geographic area than the proposed rule, 17.5 nm 2 (60 km 2 ) vs. 6.88 nm 2 (28.60 km 2 ), but would not encompass the entire period during which yellowfin grouper are known to spawn, thereby potentially negating the purpose and effectiveness of the closure

t 622

Fisheries, Fishing, Puerto Rico, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Virgin Islands.

Dated: November 10, 2004. Rebecca Lent, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine Fisheries Service.

For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF, AND SOUTH ATLANTIC

1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:

Authority:

16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

2. In § 622.33, paragraph (a)(4) is added to read as follows:

§ 622.33 Caribbean EEZ seasonal and/or area closures. (a) * * *

(4) Grammanik Bank closed area. (i) The Grammanik Bank closed area is bounded by rhumb lines connecting, in order, the following points:

Point North lat. West long. A 18°12.40′ 64°59.00′ B 18°10.00′ 64°59.00′ C 18°10.00′ 64°56.10′ D 18°12.40′ 64°56.10′ A 18°12.40′ 64°59.00′ (ii) From February 1, 2005, through April 30, 2005, no person may fish for or possess any species of fish, except highly migratory species, within the Grammanik Bank closed area. For the purpose of paragraph (a)(4) of this section, fish means finfish, mollusks, crustaceans, and all other forms of marine animal and plant life other than marine mammals and birds. Highly migratory species means bluefin, bigeye, yellowfin, albacore, and skipjack tunas; swordfish; sharks (listed in appendix A to 50 CFR part 635); white marlin, blue marlin, sailfish, and longbill spearfish.

[FR Doc. 04-25430 Filed 11-15-04; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-22-S

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.