Proposed Revisions to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) for June 2018

FederalAgency guidance

Ask Donna

How this section applies to your facts.

FDIC Financial Institution Letters › Proposed Revisions to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) for June 2018

This text was captured on Aug 14, 2026. It is a snapshot, not a live feed, so check the official code before relying on it.

Text

51908

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on November 2,

2017.

Barbara L. Hall,

FAA Information Collection Clearance

Officer, Performance, Policy, and Records

Management Branch, ASP–110.

[FR Doc. 2017–24332 Filed 11–7–17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION

Proposed Agency Information

Collection Activities; Comment

Request

AGENCY: Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency (OCC), Treasury; Board of

Governors of the Federal Reserve

System (Board); and Federal Deposit

Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

ACTION: Joint notice and request for

comment.

SUMMARY: In accordance with the

requirements of the Paperwork

Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the OCC,

the Board, and the FDIC (the

‘‘agencies’’) may not conduct or

sponsor, and the respondent is not

required to respond to, an information

collection unless it displays a currently

valid Office of Management and Budget

(OMB) control number. The Federal

Financial Institutions Examination

Council (FFIEC), of which the agencies

are members, has approved the

agencies’ publication for public

comment of a proposal to revise the

Consolidated Reports of Condition and

Income for a Bank with Domestic

Offices Only and Total Assets Less Than

$1 Billion (FFIEC 051), the Consolidated

Reports of Condition and Income for a

Bank with Domestic Offices Only

(FFIEC 041), and the Consolidated

Reports of Condition and Income for a

Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices

(FFIEC 031), which are currently

approved collections of information.

The Consolidated Reports of Condition

and Income are commonly referred to as

the Call Report.

The proposed revisions to the FFIEC

051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031 Call

Reports would result in an overall

reduction in burden

, and the Consolidated

Reports of Condition and Income for a

Bank with Domestic and Foreign Offices

(FFIEC 031), which are currently

approved collections of information.

The Consolidated Reports of Condition

and Income are commonly referred to as

the Call Report.

The proposed revisions to the FFIEC

051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031 Call

Reports would result in an overall

reduction in burden. In particular, the

proposed revisions would delete or

consolidate a number of items and add

a new or raise certain existing reporting

thresholds. The proposed revisions

would take effect as of the June 30,

2018, report date. At the end of the

comment period for this notice, the

comments and recommendations

received will be reviewed to determine

whether the FFIEC and the agencies

should modify the proposed revisions to

the FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC

031 prior to giving final approval. As

required by the PRA, the agencies will

then publish a second Federal Register

notice for a 30-day comment period and

submit the final FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041,

and FFIEC 031 to OMB for review and

approval.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on

or before January 8, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are

invited to submit written comments to

any or all of the agencies. All comments,

which should refer to the OMB control

number(s), will be shared among the

agencies.

OCC: You may submit comments,

which should refer to ‘‘FFIEC 031,

FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051,’’ by any of

the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: regs.comments@

occ.treas.gov.

• Fax: (571) 465–4326.

• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory

Activities Division, Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th

Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Washington,

DC 20219.

All comments received, including

attachments and other supporting

materials, are part of the public record

and subject to public disclosure

uctions for submitting comments.

• Email: regs.comments@

occ.treas.gov.

• Fax: (571) 465–4326.

• Mail: Legislative and Regulatory

Activities Division, Office of the

Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th

Street SW., Suite 3E–218, Washington,

DC 20219.

All comments received, including

attachments and other supporting

materials, are part of the public record

and subject to public disclosure. Do not

include any information in your

comment or supporting materials that

you consider confidential or

inappropriate for public disclosure.

You may personally inspect and

photocopy comments at the OCC, 400

7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20219.

For security reasons, the OCC requires

that visitors make an appointment to

inspect comments. You may do so by

calling (202) 649–6700 or, for persons

who are deaf or hard of hearing, TTY,

(202) 649–5597. Upon arrival, visitors

will be required to present valid

government-issued photo identification

and submit to security screening in

order to inspect and photocopy

comments.

Board: You may submit comments,

which should refer to ‘‘FFIEC 031,

FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051,’’ by any of

the following methods:

• Agency Web site: http://

www.federalreserve.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments at:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/

generalinfo/foia/ProposedRegs.cfm.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: regs.comments@

federalreserve.gov. Include the reporting

form numbers in the subject line of the

message.

• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–

3102.

• Mail: Ann E. Misback, Secretary,

Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System, 20th Street and

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20551.

All public comments are available

from the Board’s Web site at

www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/

foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,

unless modified for technical reasons

ect line of the

message.

• Fax: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452–

3102.

• Mail: Ann E. Misback, Secretary,

Board of Governors of the Federal

Reserve System, 20th Street and

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,

DC 20551.

All public comments are available

from the Board’s Web site at

www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/

foia/ProposedRegs.cfm as submitted,

unless modified for technical reasons.

Accordingly, your comments will not be

edited to remove any identifying or

contact information. Public comments

may also be viewed electronically or in

paper form in Room 3515, 1801 K Street

NW. (between 18th and 19th Streets

NW.), Washington, DC 20006 between

9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays.

FDIC: You may submit comments,

which should refer to ‘‘FFIEC 031,

FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 051,’’ by any of

the following methods:

• Agency Web site: https://

www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/federal/.

Follow the instructions for submitting

comments on the FDIC’s Web site.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal:

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments.

• Email: comments@FDIC.gov.

Include ‘‘FFIEC 031, FFIEC 041, and

FFIEC 051’’ in the subject line of the

message.

• Mail: Manuel E. Cabeza, Counsel,

Attn: Comments, Room MB–3007,

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,

550 17th Street NW., Washington, DC

20429.

• Hand Delivery: Comments may be

hand delivered to the guard station at

the rear of the 550 17th Street Building

(located on F Street) on business days

between 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

Public Inspection: All comments

received will be posted without change

to https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/

laws/federal/ including any personal

information provided. Paper copies of

public comments may be requested from

the FDIC Public Information Center by

telephone at (877) 275–3342 or (703)

562–2200.

Additionally, commenters may send a

copy of their comments to the OMB

desk officer for the agencies by mail to

the Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, U.S

/www.fdic.gov/regulations/

laws/federal/ including any personal

information provided. Paper copies of

public comments may be requested from

the FDIC Public Information Center by

telephone at (877) 275–3342 or (703)

562–2200.

Additionally, commenters may send a

copy of their comments to the OMB

desk officer for the agencies by mail to

the Office of Information and Regulatory

Affairs, U.S. Office of Management and

Budget, New Executive Office Building,

Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW.,

Washington, DC 20503; by fax to (202)

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00108

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51909

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

1 Generally, institutions with domestic offices

only and total assets less than $1 billion.

2 See 80 FR 56539 (September 18, 2015), 81 FR

45357 (July 13, 2016), 81 FR 54190 (August 15,

2016) (referred to hereafter as the ‘‘August 2016 Call

Report proposal’’), 82 FR 2444 (January 9, 2017),

and 82 FR 29147 (June 27, 2017) (referred to

hereafter as the ‘‘June 2017 Call Report proposal’’)

for further information on the actions taken under

this initiative.

395–6974; or by email to oira_

submission@omb.eop.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

further information about the proposed

revisions to the Call Report discussed in

this notice, please contact any of the

agency staff whose names appear below.

In addition, copies of the Call Report

forms can be obtained at the FFIEC’s

Web site (https://www.ffiec.gov/ffiec_

report_forms.htm).

OCC: Kevin Korzeniewski, Counsel,

a_

submission@omb.eop.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For

further information about the proposed

revisions to the Call Report discussed in

this notice, please contact any of the

agency staff whose names appear below.

In addition, copies of the Call Report

forms can be obtained at the FFIEC’s

Web site (https://www.ffiec.gov/ffiec_

report_forms.htm).

OCC: Kevin Korzeniewski, Counsel,

(202) 649–5490, or for persons who are

deaf or hard of hearing, TTY, (202) 649–

5597.

Board: Nuha Elmaghrabi, Federal

Reserve Board Clearance Officer, (202)

452–3884, Office of the Chief Data

Officer, Board of Governors of the

Federal Reserve System, 20th and C

Streets NW., Washington, DC 20551.

Telecommunications Device for the Deaf

(TDD) users may call (202) 263–4869.

FDIC: Manuel E. Cabeza, Counsel,

(202) 898–3767, Legal Division, Federal

Deposit Insurance Corporation, 550 17th

Street NW., Washington, DC 20429.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

agencies propose revisions to data items

reported on the FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041,

and FFIEC 031 Call Reports.

Report Title: Consolidated Reports of

Condition and Income (Call Report).

Form Numbers: FFIEC 051 (for

eligible small institutions), FFIEC 041

(for banks and savings associations with

domestic offices only), and FFIEC 031

(for banks and savings associations with

domestic and foreign offices).

Frequency of Response: Quarterly.

Affected Public: Business or other for-

profit.

OCC

OMB Control No.: 1557–0081.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

1,307 national banks and federal savings

associations.

Estimated Average Burden per

Response: 46.05 burden hours per

quarter to file.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

240,749 burden hours to file.

Board

OMB Control No.: 7100–0036.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

822 state member banks.

Estimated Average Burden per

Response: 50.16 burden hours per

quarter to file.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

164,926 burden hours to file.

FDIC

OMB Control No.: 3064–0052

Burden per

Response: 46.05 burden hours per

quarter to file.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

240,749 burden hours to file.

Board

OMB Control No.: 7100–0036.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

822 state member banks.

Estimated Average Burden per

Response: 50.16 burden hours per

quarter to file.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

164,926 burden hours to file.

FDIC

OMB Control No.: 3064–0052.

Estimated Number of Respondents:

3,710 insured state nonmember banks

and state savings associations.

Estimated Average Burden per

Response: 44.14 burden hours per

quarter to file.

Estimated Total Annual Burden:

655,038 burden hours to file.

The proposed burden-reducing

revisions are the result of an ongoing

effort by the agencies to reduce the

burden associated with the preparation

and filing of Call Reports and, as

detailed in Appendices B, C, and D,

achieve burden reductions by the

removal or consolidation of numerous

items, and the raising of certain

reporting thresholds.

The estimated average burden hours,

which reflect an overall reduction,

collectively reflect the estimates for the

FFIEC 051, the FFIEC 041, and the

FFIEC 031 reports for each agency.

When the estimates are calculated by

type of report across the agencies, the

estimated average burden hours per

quarter are 38.15 (FFIEC 051), 54.89

(FFIEC 041), and 122.50 (FFIEC 031).

The estimated burden per response for

the quarterly filings of the Call Report

is an average that varies by agency

because of differences in the

composition of the institutions under

each agency’s supervision (e.g., size

distribution of institutions, types of

activities in which they are engaged,

and existence of foreign offices).

Type of Review: Revision of currently

approved collections.

General Description of Reports

These information collections are

mandatory pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 161

(for national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for

state member banks), 12 U.S.C. 1817 (for

insured state nonmember commercial

and savings banks), and 12 U.S.C

es of

activities in which they are engaged,

and existence of foreign offices).

Type of Review: Revision of currently

approved collections.

General Description of Reports

These information collections are

mandatory pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 161

(for national banks), 12 U.S.C. 324 (for

state member banks), 12 U.S.C. 1817 (for

insured state nonmember commercial

and savings banks), and 12 U.S.C. 1464

(for federal and state savings

associations). At present, except for

selected data items and text, these

information collections are not given

confidential treatment.

Abstract

Institutions submit Call Report data to

the agencies each quarter for the

agencies’ use in monitoring the

condition, performance, and risk profile

of individual institutions and the

industry as a whole. Call Report data

serve a regulatory or public policy

purpose by assisting the agencies in

fulfilling their missions of ensuring the

safety and soundness of financial

institutions and the financial system

and the protection of consumer

financial rights, as well as agency-

specific missions affecting federally and

state-chartered institutions, e.g.,

monetary policy, financial stability, and

deposit insurance. Call Reports are the

source of the most current statistical

data available for identifying areas of

focus for on-site and off-site

examinations. The agencies use Call

Report data in evaluating institutions’

corporate applications, including, in

particular, interstate merger and

acquisition applications for which, as

required by law, the agencies must

determine whether the resulting

institution would control more than 10

percent of the total amount of deposits

of insured depository institutions in the

United States. Call Report data also are

used to calculate institutions’ deposit

insurance and Financing Corporation

assessments and national banks’ and

federal savings associations’ semiannual

assessment fees.

Current Actions

I

s must

determine whether the resulting

institution would control more than 10

percent of the total amount of deposits

of insured depository institutions in the

United States. Call Report data also are

used to calculate institutions’ deposit

insurance and Financing Corporation

assessments and national banks’ and

federal savings associations’ semiannual

assessment fees.

Current Actions

I. Introduction

As part of an initiative launched by

the FFIEC in December 2014 to identify

potential opportunities to reduce

burden associated with Call Report

requirements for community banks, the

FFIEC and the agencies have taken

several actions, including: (1) The

finalization in mid-2016 of a number of

burden-reducing changes and other

revisions to the Call Report that were

implemented in September 2016 and

March 2017; (2) outreach to institutions

to obtain a better understanding of

significant sources of reporting burden

in their Call Report preparation

processes; (3) the creation of a new

streamlined FFIEC 051 Call Report for

eligible small institutions 1 that took

effect as of the March 31, 2017, report

date; and (4) the publication for

comment in June 2017 of additional

proposed burden-reducing Call Report

changes, as well as proposed Call Report

revisions that address the definition of

‘‘past due’’ for regulatory reporting

purposes and changes in the accounting

for equity investments, all of which

have a proposed March 31, 2018,

effective date.2

As another key part of the FFIEC’s

Call Report burden-reduction initiative

for community banks, in 2015 the

agencies accelerated the start of the next

statutorily mandated review of the

existing Call Report data items (Full

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00109

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

ective date.2

As another key part of the FFIEC’s

Call Report burden-reduction initiative

for community banks, in 2015 the

agencies accelerated the start of the next

statutorily mandated review of the

existing Call Report data items (Full

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00109

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51910

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

3 This review is mandated by section 604 of the

Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act of 2006 (12

U.S.C. 1817(a)(11)).

4 12 U.S.C. 1817(a)(11)(B).

5 A summary of the FFIEC member entities’ uses

of the data items retained in the Call Report

schedules covered by the first and second portions

of the agencies’ user surveys are included in

Appendix A of the agencies’ Federal Register

notices published on January 9, 2017 (82 FR 2444)

and June 27, 2017 (82 FR 29147), respectively.

Review),3 which otherwise would not

have commenced until 2017. After

completing this review, the agencies are

required to ‘‘reduce or eliminate any

requirement to file information or

schedules . . . (other than information

or schedules that are otherwise required

by law)’’ if the agencies determine that

‘‘the continued collection of such

information or schedules is no longer

necessary or appropriate.’’ 4 To provide

a foundation for the Full Review, users

of Call Report data items, who are

internal staff at the FFIEC member

entities, participated in a series of nine

surveys conducted over a 19-month

period that began in mid-July 2015 and

ended in mid-February 2017. As an

integral part of these surveys, users were

asked to fully explain the need for each

Call Report data item they deem

essential, how the data item is used, the

frequency with which it is needed, and

the population of institutions from

which it is needed

articipated in a series of nine

surveys conducted over a 19-month

period that began in mid-July 2015 and

ended in mid-February 2017. As an

integral part of these surveys, users were

asked to fully explain the need for each

Call Report data item they deem

essential, how the data item is used, the

frequency with which it is needed, and

the population of institutions from

which it is needed. Call Report

schedules were placed into nine groups

and prioritized for review, generally

based on the level of burden cited by

banking industry representatives. Based

on the results of the user surveys and

consistent with the statutory

requirements governing the Full

Review, the agencies have been

identifying data items to be considered

for removal, less frequent collection,

and new or revised reporting thresholds

to reduce burden.

Based on the results of the third and

final portion of the user surveys and

other information, the agencies are

proposing various burden-reducing

changes in this proposal. The schedules

reviewed in the final portion of the user

surveys primarily include schedules

that collect data on complex or

specialized activities. A summary of the

FFIEC member entities’ uses of the data

items retained in the Call Report

schedules covered by this portion of the

user surveys is included in Appendix

A.5 Several of these schedules were not

included in the new FFIEC 051 when it

was created. Therefore, revisions

proposed in this notice more

significantly affect schedules and data

items in the FFIEC 041 and FFIEC 031.

In addition, as a framework for the

actions it is undertaking, the FFIEC

developed a set of guiding principles for

use in evaluating potential additions

and deletions of Call Report data items

and other revisions to the Call Report

FFIEC 051 when it

was created. Therefore, revisions

proposed in this notice more

significantly affect schedules and data

items in the FFIEC 041 and FFIEC 031.

In addition, as a framework for the

actions it is undertaking, the FFIEC

developed a set of guiding principles for

use in evaluating potential additions

and deletions of Call Report data items

and other revisions to the Call Report.

In general, data items collected in the

Call Report must meet three guiding

principles: (1) The data items serve a

long-term regulatory or public policy

purpose by assisting the FFIEC member

entities in fulfilling their missions of

ensuring the safety and soundness of

financial institutions and the financial

system and the protection of consumer

financial rights, as well as agency-

specific missions affecting federally and

state-chartered institutions; (2) the data

items to be collected maximize practical

utility and minimize, to the extent

practicable and appropriate, burden on

financial institutions; and (3) equivalent

data items are not readily available

through other means.

II. General Discussion of Proposed Call

Report Revisions

As discussed above, the Call Report

schedules have been reviewed as part of

the Full Review, conducted through a

series of nine user surveys. The results

of the final portion of the surveys were

evaluated in the development of this

proposal. In addition, the results of

certain surveys were re-evaluated and

further burden-reducing changes were

incorporated into this proposal. In

developing this proposal, the agencies

were cognizant of the comments and

feedback received from the industry,

over the course of this FFIEC initiative,

requesting that the agencies provide

relief from the burden of preparing Call

Reports. The proposed revisions to the

FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031

are discussed in Sections III.A, III.B, and

III.C, respectively

to this proposal. In

developing this proposal, the agencies

were cognizant of the comments and

feedback received from the industry,

over the course of this FFIEC initiative,

requesting that the agencies provide

relief from the burden of preparing Call

Reports. The proposed revisions to the

FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041, and FFIEC 031

are discussed in Sections III.A, III.B, and

III.C, respectively.

The schedules reviewed in the

portion of the user surveys evaluated in

the development of this proposal

include:

• Schedule RI–A—Changes in Bank

Equity Capital

• Schedule RI–C—Disaggregated Data

on the Allowance for Loan and Lease

Losses [FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041

only]

• Schedule RC–A—Cash and Balances

Due from Depository Institutions

• Schedule RC–F—Other Assets

• Schedule RC–G—Other Liabilities

• Schedule RC–H—Selected Balance

Sheet Items for Domestic Offices

[FFIEC 031 only]

• Schedule RC–I—Assets and Liabilities

of IBFs [FFIEC 031 only]

• Schedule RC–P—1–4 Family

Residential Mortgage Banking

Activities (in Domestic Offices)

[FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041 only]

• Schedule RC–Q—Assets and

Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on

a Recurring Basis [FFIEC 031 and

FFIEC 041 only]

• Schedule RC–S—Servicing,

Securitization, and Asset Sale

Activities [FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041

only]

• Schedule RC–T—Fiduciary and

Related Services

• Schedule RC–V—Variable Interest

Entities [FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041

only]

The schedules re-evaluated in the

development of this proposal include:

• Schedule RC–B—Securities

• Schedule RC–N—Past Due and

Nonaccrual Loans, Leases, and Other

Assets

• Schedule SU—Supplemental

Information [FFIEC 051 only]

Table 1 summarizes the changes

already finalized and implemented as

part of the FFIEC’s community bank

Call Report burden-reduction initiative

d FFIEC 041

only]

The schedules re-evaluated in the

development of this proposal include:

• Schedule RC–B—Securities

• Schedule RC–N—Past Due and

Nonaccrual Loans, Leases, and Other

Assets

• Schedule SU—Supplemental

Information [FFIEC 051 only]

Table 1 summarizes the changes

already finalized and implemented as

part of the FFIEC’s community bank

Call Report burden-reduction initiative.

TABLE 1—DATA ITEMS REVISED AS OF MARCH 31, 2017

Finalized call report revisions

051

041

031

Items Removed, Net * ..................................................................................................................

967

60

68

Change in Item Frequency to Semiannual ..................................................................................

96

........................

........................

Change in Item Frequency to Annual .........................................................................................

10

........................

........................

Items with a New or Increased Reporting Threshold ..................................................................

........................

7

13

* ‘‘Items Removed, Net’’ reflects the effects of consolidating existing items, adding control totals, and, for the FFIEC 051, relocating individual

items from other schedules to Schedule SU, some of which were consolidated in Schedule SU. In addition, included in this number for the FFIEC

051, approximately 300 items were items that institutions with less than $1 billion in total assets were exempt from reporting due to existing re-

porting thresholds in the FFIEC 041.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00110

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

ule SU. In addition, included in this number for the FFIEC

051, approximately 300 items were items that institutions with less than $1 billion in total assets were exempt from reporting due to existing re-

porting thresholds in the FFIEC 041.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00110

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51911

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

6 If this preprinted caption were removed and an

institution has retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit cards in an

amount in excess of the reporting threshold, the

institution would itemize and describe this

component in one of the subitems of item 6 without

a preprinted caption.

7 An institution does not meet the fiduciary

income test if its gross fiduciary and related

services income was less than or equal to 10 percent

of revenue (net interest income plus noninterest

income) for the preceding calendar year.

Table 2 summarizes the proposed

burden-reducing revisions to data items

included in the June 2017 Call Report

proposal that would take effect March

31, 2018.

TABLE 2—PROPOSED DATA REVISIONS IN JUNE 2017

Proposed call report revisions

051

041

031

Items Proposed to be Removed, Net * ........................................................................................

54

106

86

Proposed Change in Item Frequency to Semiannual .................................................................

17

31

31

Proposed Change in Item Frequency to Annual .........................................................................

26

3

3

Items with a Proposed New or Increased Reporting Threshold .................................................

26

106

178

* ‘‘Items Proposed to be Removed, Net’’ reflects the effects of consolidating existing items and relocating individual items to other schedules

31

Proposed Change in Item Frequency to Annual .........................................................................

26

3

3

Items with a Proposed New or Increased Reporting Threshold .................................................

26

106

178

* ‘‘Items Proposed to be Removed, Net’’ reflects the effects of consolidating existing items and relocating individual items to other schedules.

Table 3 summarizes the additional

proposed burden-reducing revisions to

data items included in this notice. The

proposed revisions are discussed in

Section III. Detail for each affected data

item is shown in Appendix B (FFIEC

051), Appendix C (FFIEC 041), and

Appendix D (FFIEC 031).

TABLE 3—PROPOSED DATA REVISIONS IN THIS NOTICE

Proposed call report revisions

051

041

031

Items Proposed to be Removed, Net * ........................................................................................

15

184

134

Items with a Proposed New or Increased Reporting Threshold .................................................

29

181

213

* ‘‘Items Proposed to be Removed, Net’’ reflects the effects of consolidating existing items and relocating individual items to other schedules.

The Call Report revisions that are the

subject of this proposal would take

effect June 30, 2018. Additional

information on timing of the proposed

revisions is provided in Section IV.

III. Detail of Specific Proposed Call

Report Revisions

A. Revisions to the FFIEC 051

Schedule RC–A

The agencies propose to remove

Schedule RC–A, Cash and Balances Due

from Depository Institutions, in its

entirety from the FFIEC 051. This

schedule is currently completed by

institutions with $300 million or more

in total assets

timing of the proposed

revisions is provided in Section IV.

III. Detail of Specific Proposed Call

Report Revisions

A. Revisions to the FFIEC 051

Schedule RC–A

The agencies propose to remove

Schedule RC–A, Cash and Balances Due

from Depository Institutions, in its

entirety from the FFIEC 051. This

schedule is currently completed by

institutions with $300 million or more

in total assets. The agencies no longer

need the current level of detail provided

by the existing items in Schedule RC–

A from the smaller institutions eligible

to file this version of the Call Report

who are required to complete this

schedule, as sufficient information on

cash and due from balances is provided

for these institutions in Schedule RC,

items 1.a and 1.b.

Schedule RC–B

With respect to Schedule RC–B of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s holdings of those

residential mortgage pass-through

securities that are currently reported in

items 4.a.(1) for those guaranteed by the

Government National Mortgage

Association (GNMA) and 4.a.(2) for

those issued by the Federal National

Mortgage Association (FNMA) and the

Federal Home Loan Mortgage

Corporation (FHLMC) into a single item

4.a.(1). Existing item 4.a.(3) for other

residential mortgage pass-through

securities would be renumbered as item

4.a.(2). The agencies no longer need the

current level of detail for these holdings

from the smaller institutions eligible to

file this version of the Call Report.

Schedule RC–F

With respect to Schedule RC–F of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s interest-only strips

receivable, which are currently reported

in items 3.a for those on mortgage loans

and 3.b for those on other financial

assets, into a single item 3. The agencies

no longer need the current level of

detail for these holdings in the Call

Report

le RC–F

With respect to Schedule RC–F of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s interest-only strips

receivable, which are currently reported

in items 3.a for those on mortgage loans

and 3.b for those on other financial

assets, into a single item 3. The agencies

no longer need the current level of

detail for these holdings in the Call

Report.

In addition, the agencies propose to

remove the preprinted caption for

retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit

cards (item 6.d) as few institutions

report having this component of other

assets in an amount in excess of the

existing reporting threshold for

disclosing this component.6 Items 6.e

through 6.k would be renumbered as

items 6.d through 6.j.

Schedule RC–T

With respect to Schedule RC–T of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

increase the reporting threshold for

reporting the components of fiduciary

and related services income. For

institutions with total fiduciary assets

greater than $100 million but less than

or equal to $250 million that do not

meet the fiduciary income test for

quarterly reporting,7 the agencies

propose to no longer require the

reporting of items 14 through 26. There

would be no change to the reporting

requirements applicable to items 14

through 26 for all other institutions. The

agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on fiduciary and related

services income from institutions with

less than $250 million in total fiduciary

assets that do not meet the fiduciary

income test.

In addition, the agencies propose to

add a reporting threshold for reporting

the number and market value of

collective investment funds and

common trust funds by type of fund in

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.g. For

institutions at which these funds have a

total market value of less than $1 billion

(as of the preceding December 31), the

agencies propose to no longer require

the reporting of Memorandum items 3.a

through 3.g

add a reporting threshold for reporting

the number and market value of

collective investment funds and

common trust funds by type of fund in

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.g. For

institutions at which these funds have a

total market value of less than $1 billion

(as of the preceding December 31), the

agencies propose to no longer require

the reporting of Memorandum items 3.a

through 3.g. Such institutions would

report only the total number and market

value of their collective investment

funds and common trust funds in

Memorandum item 3.h. Institutions at

which the total market value of their

VerDate Sep<11>2014

21:03 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00111

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51912

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

8 If this preprinted caption were removed and an

institution has retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit cards in an

amount in excess of the reporting threshold, the

institution would itemize and describe this

component in one of the subitems of item 6 without

a preprinted caption.

collective investment funds and

common trust funds is $1 billion or

more would continue to report

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.h.

The agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on collective investment

funds and common trust funds in the

Call Report from institutions at which

the total market value of these funds is

less than $1 billion.

Schedule SU

With respect to Schedule SU of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

remove item 8.e on the amount of

outstanding credit card fees and finance

charges included in credit card

receivables sold and securitized with

servicing retained or with recourse or

other seller-provided credit

enhancements, which is currently

applicable to eligible small institutions

that specialize in credit card lending

respect to Schedule SU of the

FFIEC 051, the agencies propose to

remove item 8.e on the amount of

outstanding credit card fees and finance

charges included in credit card

receivables sold and securitized with

servicing retained or with recourse or

other seller-provided credit

enhancements, which is currently

applicable to eligible small institutions

that specialize in credit card lending.

The agencies no longer need this

information from these smaller credit

card lending institutions.

B. Revisions to the FFIEC 041

Schedule RC–A

With respect to Schedule RC–A of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s balances due from

depository institutions in the United

States, which are currently reported in

items 2.a for balances due from U.S.

branches and agencies of foreign banks

and 2.b for balances due from other

commercial banks and other depository

institutions in the United States, into a

single item 2. In addition, the agencies

propose to consolidate the reporting of

an institution’s balances due from banks

in foreign countries and foreign central

banks, which are currently reported in

items 3.a for balances due from foreign

branches of other U.S. banks and 3.b for

balances due from banks in foreign

countries and foreign central banks, into

a single item 3. The agencies no longer

need the current level of detail for these

balances in the Call Report.

Schedule RC–F

With respect to Schedule RC–F of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s interest-only strips

receivable, which are currently reported

in items 3.a for those on mortgage loans

and 3.b for those on other financial

assets, into a single item 3. The agencies

no longer need the current level of

detail for these holdings in the Call

Report

le RC–F

With respect to Schedule RC–F of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s interest-only strips

receivable, which are currently reported

in items 3.a for those on mortgage loans

and 3.b for those on other financial

assets, into a single item 3. The agencies

no longer need the current level of

detail for these holdings in the Call

Report.

In addition, the agencies propose to

remove the preprinted caption for

retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit

cards (item 6.d) as few institutions

report having this component of other

assets in an amount in excess of the

existing reporting threshold for

disclosing this component.8 Items 6.e

through 6.k would be renumbered as

items 6.d through 6.j.

Schedule RC–N

With respect to Schedule RC–N of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

remove the data items for reporting the

past due and nonaccrual status of the

fair value and unpaid principal balance

of held-for-investment loans measured

at fair value, which are currently

reported in Memorandum items 5.b.(1)

and 5.b.(2), columns A through C. The

agencies no longer need this current

level of detail in the Call Report. The

agencies would renumber Memorandum

item 5.a, ‘‘Loans and leases held for

sale,’’ as Memorandum item 5 for

columns A through C.

Schedule RC–P

With respect to Schedule RC–P of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by removing the current $1

billion asset-size threshold and applying

only the existing activity-based

threshold to all institutions, regardless

of size

Memorandum

item 5.a, ‘‘Loans and leases held for

sale,’’ as Memorandum item 5 for

columns A through C.

Schedule RC–P

With respect to Schedule RC–P of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by removing the current $1

billion asset-size threshold and applying

only the existing activity-based

threshold to all institutions, regardless

of size. As proposed, Schedule RC–P

would be completed by institutions

where any of the following residential

mortgage banking activities exceeds $10

million for two consecutive quarters:

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loan originations and

purchases for resale from all sources

during a calendar quarter; or

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loan sales during a calendar

quarter; or

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans held for sale or trading

at calendar quarter-end.

The agencies believe an activity-based

threshold alone is more appropriate

than an asset-size threshold for

determining which institutions should

file this schedule.

The agencies also propose to

consolidate the 1–4 family residential

mortgage banking activity detail

collected in this schedule for closed-end

loans and commitments under open-end

loans for retail originations (item 1),

wholesale originations and purchases

(item 2), mortgage loans sold (item 3),

mortgage loans held for sale or trading

(item 4), and repurchases and

indemnifications of mortgage loans

(item 6). Specifically, items 1.a, 1.b, and

1.c.(1) would be combined into new

item 1; items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c.(1) would

be combined into new item 2; items 3.a,

3.b, and 3.c.(1) would be combined into

new item 3; items 4.a, 4.b, and 4.c.(1)

would be combined into new item 4;

and items 6.a, 6.b, and 6.c.(1) would be

combined into new item 6

purchases and

indemnifications of mortgage loans

(item 6). Specifically, items 1.a, 1.b, and

1.c.(1) would be combined into new

item 1; items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c.(1) would

be combined into new item 2; items 3.a,

3.b, and 3.c.(1) would be combined into

new item 3; items 4.a, 4.b, and 4.c.(1)

would be combined into new item 4;

and items 6.a, 6.b, and 6.c.(1) would be

combined into new item 6. The agencies

also propose to consolidate noninterest

income from the sale, securitization,

and servicing of closed-end and open-

end 1–4 family residential mortgage

loans currently reported in items 5.a

and 5.b into a new item 5. In addition,

the agencies propose to remove detail

on the principal amount funded for

open-end loans extended under lines of

credit for each of the above listed

categories currently reported in items

1.c.(2), 2.c.(2), 3.c.(2), 4.c.(2), and 6.c.(2).

The agencies are proposing these

changes because they no longer need the

current level of detail on 1–4 family

residential mortgage banking activities

in the Call Report.

Schedule RC–Q

With respect to Schedule RC–Q of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by applying only an activity

threshold and not an asset-size

threshold, which currently is $500

million. As proposed, Schedule RC–Q

would be completed only by institutions

that (1) have elected to report financial

instruments or servicing assets and

liabilities at fair value under a fair value

option with changes in fair value

recognized in earnings, or (2) are

required to complete Schedule RC–D,

Trading Assets and Liabilities.

Institutions that do not meet either of

these criteria would no longer need to

complete this schedule, regardless of

asset size. The agencies believe the

activity thresholds are more appropriate

than the existing simple asset-size

threshold for determining which

institutions must complete this

schedule

nings, or (2) are

required to complete Schedule RC–D,

Trading Assets and Liabilities.

Institutions that do not meet either of

these criteria would no longer need to

complete this schedule, regardless of

asset size. The agencies believe the

activity thresholds are more appropriate

than the existing simple asset-size

threshold for determining which

institutions must complete this

schedule.

For loans held for investment and

held for sale measured at fair value

under a fair value option, the agencies

also propose to consolidate the detail on

the fair value and the unpaid principal

balance of such loans currently

collected in Memorandum items 3 and

4 of this schedule. For fair value option

loans secured by 1–4 family residential

properties, detail on revolving, open-

end loans secured by 1–4 family

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00112

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51913

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

9 In the June 2017 Call Report proposal, the

agencies proposed comparable consolidation of the

detail on loans held for trading, which are

measured at fair value, and the unpaid principal

balance of such loans in Schedule RC–D.

10 An institution does not meet the fiduciary

income test if its gross fiduciary and related

services income was less than or equal to 10 percent

of revenue (net interest income plus noninterest

income) for the preceding calendar year.

residential properties and extended

under lines of credit; closed-end loans

secured by first liens on 1–4 family

residential properties; and closed-end

loans secured by junior liens on 1–4

family residential properties would be

consolidated into a single category

was less than or equal to 10 percent

of revenue (net interest income plus noninterest

income) for the preceding calendar year.

residential properties and extended

under lines of credit; closed-end loans

secured by first liens on 1–4 family

residential properties; and closed-end

loans secured by junior liens on 1–4

family residential properties would be

consolidated into a single category. For

fair value option loans secured by real

estate other than 1–4 family residential

properties, detail on construction, land

development, and other land loans;

loans secured by farmland; loans

secured by multifamily (5 or more)

residential properties; and loans secured

by nonfarm nonresidential properties

also would be consolidated into a single

category. For fair value option consumer

loans, detail on credit cards, other

revolving credit plans, automobile

loans, and other consumer loans would

be consolidated into a single category.

Specifically, existing Memorandum

items 3.a.(3)(a), 3.a.(3)(b)(1), and

3.a.(3)(b)(2) would be consolidated into

new Memorandum item 3.a.(1) for the

fair value of loans secured by 1–4 family

residential properties measured at fair

value, while existing Memorandum

items 3.a.(1), 3.a.(2), 3.a.(4), and 3.a.(5)

would be consolidated into new

Memorandum item 3.a.(2) for the fair

value of all other loans secured by real

estate measured at fair value. Existing

Memorandum items 3.c.(1) through

3.c.(4) would be consolidated into new

Memorandum item 3.c for the fair value

of all consumer loans measured at fair

value

t fair

value, while existing Memorandum

items 3.a.(1), 3.a.(2), 3.a.(4), and 3.a.(5)

would be consolidated into new

Memorandum item 3.a.(2) for the fair

value of all other loans secured by real

estate measured at fair value. Existing

Memorandum items 3.c.(1) through

3.c.(4) would be consolidated into new

Memorandum item 3.c for the fair value

of all consumer loans measured at fair

value. Similarly, existing Memorandum

items 4.a.(3)(a), 4.a.(3)(b)(1), and

4.a.(3)(b)(2) would be consolidated into

new Memorandum item 4.a.(1) for the

unpaid principal balance of loans

secured by 1–4 family residential

properties measured at fair value, while

existing Memorandum items 4.a.(1),

4.a.(2), 4.a.(4), and 4.a.(5) would be

consolidated into new Memorandum

item 4.a.(2) for the unpaid principal

balance of all other loans secured by

real estate measured at fair value.

Existing Memorandum items 4.c.(1)

through 4.c.(4) would be consolidated

into new Memorandum item 4.c for the

unpaid principal balance of all

consumer loans measured at fair value.9

In addition, the agencies propose to

remove the separate reporting of fair

value detail on federal funds sold and

securities purchased under agreements

to resell in item 2, which would instead

be included as part of all other assets in

item 6. The agencies also propose to

remove the separate reporting of fair

value detail for federal funds purchased

and securities sold under agreements to

repurchase in item 9, other borrowed

money in item 11, and subordinated

notes and debentures in item 12, with

these categories of liabilities instead

being reported within all other

liabilities in item 13. The agencies are

proposing these changes because they

no longer need the current level of

detail on loans measured at fair value

under a fair value option and on certain

other fair values in the Call Report from

institutions that file the FFIEC 041

dinated

notes and debentures in item 12, with

these categories of liabilities instead

being reported within all other

liabilities in item 13. The agencies are

proposing these changes because they

no longer need the current level of

detail on loans measured at fair value

under a fair value option and on certain

other fair values in the Call Report from

institutions that file the FFIEC 041.

Schedule RC–S

With respect to Schedule RC–S of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose the

following revisions to Schedule RC–S as

they no longer need the current level of

detail on securitization and asset sale

activities in the Call Report from

institutions that file the FFIEC 041:

(a) Consolidate columns B through F of

items 1 through 5 and items 9 through 12,

which collect information on certain

securitization and asset sale activities, into

existing column G. The activities covered in

columns B through F pertain to home equity

lines, credit card receivables, auto loans,

other consumer loans, and commercial and

industrial loans, respectively. The amounts

previously reported in columns B through F

would be included in column G, ‘‘All other

loans, all leases, and all other assets.’’

(b) Consolidate the maximum amount of

credit exposures arising from recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements in

the form of retained interest-only strips,

subordinated securities and other residual

interests, and standby letters of credit and

other enhancements, which are reported in

items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c, respectively, into a

single new item 2.

(c) Remove item 3 for unused

commitments to provide liquidity to

structures reported in item 1 involving assets

sold and securitized by the reporting bank

with servicing retained or with recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements.

erests, and standby letters of credit and

other enhancements, which are reported in

items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c, respectively, into a

single new item 2.

(c) Remove item 3 for unused

commitments to provide liquidity to

structures reported in item 1 involving assets

sold and securitized by the reporting bank

with servicing retained or with recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements.

(d) Consolidate ownership (or seller’s)

interests carried as securities and loans,

which are reported in items 6.a and 6.b,

respectively, into a single new item 6, and

consolidate columns B, C, and F, which

pertain to home equity lines, credit card

receivables, and commercial and industrial

loans, respectively, into column G. The

amounts previously reported in columns B,

C, and F would be included in the new item

6 in column G, ‘‘All other loans, all leases,

and all other assets.’’ The agencies also

propose to create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

this new combined item 6.

(e) Remove items 7.a and 7.b, which

contain loan amounts included in ownership

(or seller’s) interests carried as securities that

are 30–89 days past due and 90 days or more

past due, respectively.

(f) Remove items 8.a and 8.b, which

contain charge-offs and recoveries,

respectively, on loan amounts included in

the ownership (or seller’s) interests carried as

securities that are currently reported in item

6.a.

(g) Create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

item 10 on unused commitments to provide

liquidity to other institutions’ securitization

structures.

tems 8.a and 8.b, which

contain charge-offs and recoveries,

respectively, on loan amounts included in

the ownership (or seller’s) interests carried as

securities that are currently reported in item

6.a.

(g) Create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

item 10 on unused commitments to provide

liquidity to other institutions’ securitization

structures.

(h) Remove Memorandum items 1.a. and

1.b, which contain the outstanding principal

balance and the amount of retained recourse,

respectively, on small business obligations

transferred with recourse under Section 208

of the Riegle Community Development and

Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994. The

amounts previously reported in

Memorandum items 1.a and 1.b would be

included in items 1 and 2 or items 11 and

12 of column G depending on whether the

obligations that had been sold were

securitized or not securitized, respectively.

(i) Create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

detail on asset-backed commercial paper

(ABCP) conduits in Memorandum items

3.a.(1) through 3.b.(2), and the amount of

outstanding credit card fees and finance

charges included in credit card receivables

sold and securitized with servicing retained

or with recourse or other seller-provided

credit enhancements in Memorandum item 4.

To complete Memorandum item 4, an

institution with $10 billion or more in total

assets would also need to meet one of the

existing criteria for reporting this

information, i.e., the institution, together

with affiliated institutions, has outstanding

credit card receivables that exceed $500

million as of the report date, or the

institution is a credit card specialty bank as

defined for Uniform Bank Performance

Report (UBPR) purposes.

Schedule RC–T

With respect to Schedule RC–T of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

increase the reporting threshold for

reporting the components of fiduciary

and related services income

s outstanding

credit card receivables that exceed $500

million as of the report date, or the

institution is a credit card specialty bank as

defined for Uniform Bank Performance

Report (UBPR) purposes.

Schedule RC–T

With respect to Schedule RC–T of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

increase the reporting threshold for

reporting the components of fiduciary

and related services income. For

institutions with total fiduciary assets

greater than $100 million but less than

or equal to $250 million that do not

meet the fiduciary income test for

quarterly reporting,10 the agencies

propose to no longer require the

reporting of items 14 through 26. There

would be no change to the reporting

requirements applicable to items 14

through 26 for all other institutions. The

agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on fiduciary and related

services income from institutions with

less than $250 million in total fiduciary

assets that do not meet the fiduciary

income test.

In addition, the agencies propose to

add a reporting threshold for reporting

the number and market value of

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00113

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51914

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

11 If this preprinted caption were removed and an

institution has retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit cards in an

amount in excess of the reporting threshold, the

institution would itemize and describe this

component in one of the subitems of item 6 without

a preprinted caption.

collective investment funds and

common trust funds by type of fund in

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.g. For

institutions at which these funds have a

total market value of less than $1 billion

(as of the preceding December 31), the

agencies propose to no longer require

the reporting of Memorandum items 3.a

through 3.g

omponent in one of the subitems of item 6 without

a preprinted caption.

collective investment funds and

common trust funds by type of fund in

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.g. For

institutions at which these funds have a

total market value of less than $1 billion

(as of the preceding December 31), the

agencies propose to no longer require

the reporting of Memorandum items 3.a

through 3.g. Such institutions would

report only the total number and market

value of their collective investment

funds and common trust funds in

Memorandum item 3.h. Institutions at

which the total market value of their

collective investment funds and

common trust funds is $1 billion or

more would continue to report

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.h.

The agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on collective investment

funds and common trust funds in the

Call Report from institutions at which

the total market value of these funds is

less than $1 billion.

Schedule RC–V

With respect to Schedule RC–V of the

FFIEC 041, the agencies propose to

consolidate information collected on

consolidated variable interest entities

(VIEs) used as ABCP conduits (column

B) and other VIEs (column C) for all

items into a single column B covering

all VIEs other than those used as

securitization vehicles (which will

continue to be reported in column A).

In lieu of the detailed breakdown of

assets and liabilities of ABCP conduit

VIEs currently reported in column B,

the agencies propose to collect data only

on the total assets and total liabilities of

such VIEs in new items 5 and 6,

respectively

items into a single column B covering

all VIEs other than those used as

securitization vehicles (which will

continue to be reported in column A).

In lieu of the detailed breakdown of

assets and liabilities of ABCP conduit

VIEs currently reported in column B,

the agencies propose to collect data only

on the total assets and total liabilities of

such VIEs in new items 5 and 6,

respectively. For these ABCP conduit

VIEs, the total assets item would

include the assets that can be used only

to settle these VIEs’ obligations, which

are currently reported in items 1.a

through 1.k, column B, and all other

assets of these VIEs, which are currently

reported in item 3, column B; the total

liabilities items would include these

VIEs’ liabilities for which creditors do

not have recourse to the general credit

of the reporting bank, which are

currently reported in items 2.a through

2.e, column B, and all other liabilities of

these VIEs, which are currently reported

in item 4, column B.

In the two columns of Schedule RC–

V that would remain, the agencies also

propose to consolidate the VIE

information on held-to-maturity and

available-for-sale securities in items 1.b

and 1.c, respectively, into a single new

item 1.b; loans and leases held for sale,

loans and leases held for investment,

and the allowance for loan and leases

losses in items 1.e through 1.g into a

single new item 1.c; and commercial

paper and other borrowed money in

items 2.c and 2.d, respectively, into a

single new item 2.a. In addition, the

agencies propose to remove the VIE

detail on securities purchased under

agreements to resell in item 1.d, trading

assets (other than derivatives) in item

1.h, and derivative trading assets in item

1.i. The data currently reported in these

items would be included in existing

item 1.k for other assets, which would

be renumbered as item 1.e

vely, into a

single new item 2.a. In addition, the

agencies propose to remove the VIE

detail on securities purchased under

agreements to resell in item 1.d, trading

assets (other than derivatives) in item

1.h, and derivative trading assets in item

1.i. The data currently reported in these

items would be included in existing

item 1.k for other assets, which would

be renumbered as item 1.e. The agencies

also propose to remove the VIE detail on

securities sold under agreements to

repurchase in item 2.a and derivative

trading liabilities in item 2.b; these

items would be included in existing

item 2.e for other liabilities, which

would be renumbered as item 2.b. The

agencies propose to consolidate and

remove these items because they no

longer need the current level of detail

on consolidated VIEs in the Call Report.

C. Revisions to the FFIEC 031

Schedule RC–A

With respect to Schedule RC–A of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s balances due from

depository institutions in the United

States, which are currently reported for

the consolidated bank in items 2.a for

balances due from U.S. branches and

agencies of foreign banks and 2.b for

balances due from other commercial

banks and other depository institutions

in the United States, into a single item

2 in column A. In addition, the agencies

propose to consolidate the reporting of

an institution’s balances due from banks

in foreign countries and foreign central

banks, which are currently reported for

the consolidated bank in items 3.a for

balances due from foreign branches of

other U.S. banks and 3.b for balances

due from banks in foreign countries and

foreign central banks, into a single item

3 in column A. The agencies no longer

need the current level of detail for these

balances in the Call Report

nks

in foreign countries and foreign central

banks, which are currently reported for

the consolidated bank in items 3.a for

balances due from foreign branches of

other U.S. banks and 3.b for balances

due from banks in foreign countries and

foreign central banks, into a single item

3 in column A. The agencies no longer

need the current level of detail for these

balances in the Call Report.

Schedule RC–F

With respect to Schedule RC–F of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

consolidate the reporting of an

institution’s interest-only strips

receivable, which are currently reported

in items 3.a for those on mortgage loans

and 3.b for those on other financial

assets, into a single item 3. The agencies

no longer need the current level of

detail for these holdings in the Call

Report.

In addition, the agencies propose to

remove the preprinted caption for

retained interests in accrued interest

receivable related to securitized credit

cards (item 6.d) as few institutions

report having this component of other

assets in an amount in excess of the

existing reporting threshold for

disclosing this component.11 Items 6.e

through 6.k would be renumbered as

items 6.d through 6.j.

Schedule RC–H

With respect to Schedule RC–H of the

FFIEC 031, in connection with removing

the separate detail for loans held for

investment and held for sale in

domestic offices measured at fair value

under a fair value option from Schedule

RC–Q, the agencies propose to aggregate

all loans held for investment and held

for sale in domestic offices measured at

fair value under a fair value option that

are currently reported on Schedule RC–

Q, column B, Memorandum items

3.a.(1) through 3.d (including all

subitems), into a single new item,

Schedule RC–H, item 22. This item

would be completed by institutions that

from Schedule

RC–Q, the agencies propose to aggregate

all loans held for investment and held

for sale in domestic offices measured at

fair value under a fair value option that

are currently reported on Schedule RC–

Q, column B, Memorandum items

3.a.(1) through 3.d (including all

subitems), into a single new item,

Schedule RC–H, item 22. This item

would be completed by institutions that

(1) have elected to report financial

instruments or servicing assets and

liabilities at fair value under a fair value

option with changes in fair value

recognized in earnings, or (2) are

required to complete Schedule RC–D,

Trading Assets and Liabilities. The

agencies believe relocating this data

from Schedule RC–Q to Schedule RC–H

will improve efficiency by consolidating

additional domestic office information

on Schedule RC–H.

Schedule RC–N

With respect to Schedule RC–N of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

remove the data items for reporting the

past due and nonaccrual status of the

fair value and unpaid principal balance

of held-for-investment loans measured

at fair value, which are currently

reported in Memorandum items 5.b.(1)

and 5.b.(2), columns A through C. The

agencies no longer need this current

level of detail in the Call Report. The

agencies would renumber Memorandum

item 5.a, ‘‘Loans and leases held for

sale,’’ as Memorandum item 5 for

columns A through C.

Schedule RC–P

With respect to Schedule RC–P of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by removing the current $1

billion asset-size threshold and applying

only the existing activity-based

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00114

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Schedule RC–P

With respect to Schedule RC–P of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by removing the current $1

billion asset-size threshold and applying

only the existing activity-based

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00114

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51915

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

12 The new Schedule RC–H item would be

completed only by institutions required to complete

Schedule RC–Q.

13 In the June 2017 Call Report proposal, the

agencies proposed comparable consolidation of the

detail on loans held for trading, which are

measured at fair value, and the unpaid principal

balance of such loans in Schedule RC–D.

threshold to all institutions, regardless

of size. As proposed, Schedule RC–P

would be completed by institutions

where any of the following residential

mortgage banking activities (in domestic

offices) exceeds $10 million for two

consecutive quarters:

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loan originations and

purchases for resale from all sources

during a calendar quarter; or

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loan sales during a calendar

quarter; or

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans held for sale or trading

at calendar quarter-end.

The agencies believe an activity-based

threshold alone is more appropriate

than an asset-size threshold for

determining which institutions should

file this schedule

unior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loan sales during a calendar

quarter; or

• Closed-end and open-end first lien

and junior lien 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans held for sale or trading

at calendar quarter-end.

The agencies believe an activity-based

threshold alone is more appropriate

than an asset-size threshold for

determining which institutions should

file this schedule.

The agencies also propose to

consolidate the 1–4 family residential

mortgage banking activity detail

collected in this schedule for closed-end

loans and commitments under open-end

loans for retail originations (item 1),

wholesale originations and purchases

(item 2), mortgage loans sold (item 3),

mortgage loans held for sale or trading

(item 4), and repurchases and

indemnifications of mortgage loans

(item 6). Specifically, items 1.a, 1.b, and

1.c.(1) would be combined into new

item 1; items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c.(1) would

be combined into new item 2; items 3.a,

3.b, and 3.c.(1) would be combined into

new item 3; items 4.a, 4.b, and 4.c.(1)

would be combined into new item 4;

and, items 6.a, 6.b, and 6.c.(1) would be

combined into new item 6. The agencies

also propose to consolidate noninterest

income from the sale, securitization,

and servicing of closed-end and open-

end 1–4 family residential mortgage

loans currently reported in items 5.a

and 5.b into a new item 5. In addition,

the agencies propose to remove detail

on the principal amount funded for

open-end loans extended under lines of

credit for each of the above listed

categories currently reported in items

1.c.(2), 2.c.(2), 3.c.(2), 4.c.(2), and 6.c.(2).

The agencies are proposing these

changes because they no longer need the

current level of detail on 1–4 family

residential mortgage banking activities

in the Call Report

opose to remove detail

on the principal amount funded for

open-end loans extended under lines of

credit for each of the above listed

categories currently reported in items

1.c.(2), 2.c.(2), 3.c.(2), 4.c.(2), and 6.c.(2).

The agencies are proposing these

changes because they no longer need the

current level of detail on 1–4 family

residential mortgage banking activities

in the Call Report.

Schedule RC–Q

With respect to Schedule RC–Q of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

modify the reporting criteria for this

schedule by applying only an activity

threshold and not an asset-size

threshold, which currently is $500

million. As proposed, Schedule RC–Q

would be completed only by institutions

that (1) have elected to report financial

instruments or servicing assets and

liabilities at fair value under a fair value

option with changes in fair value

recognized in earnings, or (2) are

required to complete Schedule RC–D,

Trading Assets and Liabilities.

Institutions that do not meet either of

these criteria would no longer need to

complete this schedule, regardless of

asset size. The agencies believe the

activity thresholds are more appropriate

than the existing simple asset-size

threshold for determining which

institutions must complete this

schedule.

For loans held for investment and

held for sale measured at fair value

under a fair value option, the agencies

also propose to remove column B

(domestic offices) for the fair value and

the unpaid principal balance of such

loans currently collected in

Memorandum items 3 and 4 of this

schedule, respectively, and replace the

detailed data on fair value option loans

in domestic offices with a single new

item for the total amount of fair value

option loans that would be added to

Schedule RC–H, Selected Balance Sheet

Items for Domestic Offices.12 In

addition, the agencies would

consolidate certain existing loan

categories in Memorandum items 3 and

4

items 3 and 4 of this

schedule, respectively, and replace the

detailed data on fair value option loans

in domestic offices with a single new

item for the total amount of fair value

option loans that would be added to

Schedule RC–H, Selected Balance Sheet

Items for Domestic Offices.12 In

addition, the agencies would

consolidate certain existing loan

categories in Memorandum items 3 and

4. For fair value option loans secured by

1–4 family residential properties, detail

on revolving, open-end loans secured by

1–4 family residential properties and

extended under lines of credit; closed-

end loans secured by first liens on 1–4

family residential properties; and

closed-end loans secured by junior liens

on 1–4 family residential properties that

is currently reported for domestic

offices in column B would be

consolidated into a single category and

collected for the consolidated bank. For

fair value option loans secured by real

estate other than 1–4 family residential

properties, detail on construction, land

development, and other land loans;

loans secured by farmland; loans

secured by multifamily (5 or more)

residential properties; and loans secured

by nonfarm nonresidential properties

that is currently reported for domestic

offices in column B would be

consolidated into a single category and

collected for the consolidated bank.

These proposed revisions would replace

the existing items for total fair value

option loans secured by real estate for

the consolidated bank. For fair value

option consumer loans, detail for the

consolidated bank on credit cards, other

revolving credit plans, automobile

loans, and other consumer loans would

be consolidated into a single category.

Specifically, existing Memorandum

items 3.a and 4.a in column A for the

fair value and the unpaid principal

balance of the consolidated bank’s total

loans secured by real estate would be

removed

ue

option consumer loans, detail for the

consolidated bank on credit cards, other

revolving credit plans, automobile

loans, and other consumer loans would

be consolidated into a single category.

Specifically, existing Memorandum

items 3.a and 4.a in column A for the

fair value and the unpaid principal

balance of the consolidated bank’s total

loans secured by real estate would be

removed. Existing Memorandum items

3.a.(3)(a), 3.a.(3)(b)(1), and 3.a.(3)(b)(2)

in column B would be consolidated into

new Memorandum item 3.a.(1) for the

fair value of the consolidated bank’s

loans secured by 1–4 family residential

properties measured at fair value, while

existing Memorandum items 3.a.(1),

3.a.(2), 3.a.(4), and 3.a.(5) in column B

would be consolidated into new

Memorandum item 3.a.(2) for the fair

value of all other loans secured by real

estate measured at fair value for the

consolidated bank. Existing

Memorandum items 3.c.(1) through

3.c.(4) for the consolidated bank would

be consolidated into new Memorandum

item 3.c for the fair value of all

consumer loans measured at fair value.

Similarly, existing Memorandum items

4.a.(3)(a), 4.a.(3)(b)(1), and 4.a.(3)(b)(2)

in column B would be consolidated into

new Memorandum item 4.a.(1) for the

unpaid principal balance of the

consolidated bank’s loans secured by 1–

4 family residential properties measured

at fair value, while existing

Memorandum items 4.a.(1), 4.a.(2),

4.a.(4), and 4.a.(5) in column B would

be consolidated into new Memorandum

item 4.a.(2) for unpaid principal balance

of all other loans secured by real estate

measured at fair value for the

consolidated bank

the

unpaid principal balance of the

consolidated bank’s loans secured by 1–

4 family residential properties measured

at fair value, while existing

Memorandum items 4.a.(1), 4.a.(2),

4.a.(4), and 4.a.(5) in column B would

be consolidated into new Memorandum

item 4.a.(2) for unpaid principal balance

of all other loans secured by real estate

measured at fair value for the

consolidated bank. Existing

Memorandum items 4.c.(1) through

4.c.(4) for the consolidated bank would

be consolidated into new Memorandum

item 4.c for unpaid principal balance of

all consumer loans measured at fair

value.13 The agencies are proposing

these changes because they no longer

need the current level of detail on loans

measured at fair value under a fair value

option in the Call Report from

institutions that file the FFIEC 031.

Schedule RC–S

With respect to Schedule RC–S of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose the

following revisions to Schedule RC–S,

as they no longer need the current level

of detail on securitization and asset sale

VerDate Sep<11>2014

21:13 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00115

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51916

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

14 An institution does not meet the fiduciary

income test if its gross fiduciary and related

services income was less than or equal to 10 percent

of revenue (net interest income plus noninterest

income) for the preceding calendar year.

activities in the Call Report from

institutions that file the FFIEC 031:

(a) Consolidate the maximum amount of

credit exposures arising from recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements in

the form of retained interest-only strips,

subordinated securities and other residual

interests, and standby letters of credit and

other enhancements, which are reported in

items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c, respectively, into a

single new item 2.

ns that file the FFIEC 031:

(a) Consolidate the maximum amount of

credit exposures arising from recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements in

the form of retained interest-only strips,

subordinated securities and other residual

interests, and standby letters of credit and

other enhancements, which are reported in

items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c, respectively, into a

single new item 2.

(b) Create a reporting threshold of $100

billion or more in total assets for item 3,

which is used for reporting unused

commitments to provide liquidity to

structures reported in item 1 involving assets

sold and securitized by the reporting bank

with servicing retained or with recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements.

(c) Consolidate ownership (or seller’s)

interests carried as securities and loans,

which are reported in items 6.a and 6.b,

respectively, into a single new item 6. The

agencies also propose to create a reporting

threshold of $10 billion or more in total

assets for reporting this new combined item

6.

(d) Remove items 7.a and 7.b, which

contain loan amounts included in ownership

(or seller’s) interests carried as securities that

are 30–89 days past due and 90 days or more

past due, respectively.

(e) Remove items 8.a and 8.b, which

contain charge-offs and recoveries,

respectively, on loan amounts included in

the ownership (or seller’s) interests carried as

securities that are currently reported in item

6.a.

d 7.b, which

contain loan amounts included in ownership

(or seller’s) interests carried as securities that

are 30–89 days past due and 90 days or more

past due, respectively.

(e) Remove items 8.a and 8.b, which

contain charge-offs and recoveries,

respectively, on loan amounts included in

the ownership (or seller’s) interests carried as

securities that are currently reported in item

6.a.

(f) Consolidate columns B and C of item 9,

which contain the maximum amount of

credit exposure arising from credit

enhancements in the form of standby letters

of credit, purchased subordinated securities,

and other enhancements provided by the

reporting institution to other institutions’

securitization structures, into existing

column G. The activities covered in columns

B and C pertain to home equity lines and

credit card receivables, respectively. The

amounts previously reported in columns B

and C would be included in column G, ‘‘All

other loans, all leases, and all other assets.’’

(g) Create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

unused commitments to provide liquidity to

other institutions’ securitization structures in

item 10. The agencies also propose to

consolidate columns B and C of item 10 into

existing column G. The activities covered in

columns B and C pertain to home equity

lines and credit card receivables,

respectively. The amounts previously

reported in columns B and C by institutions

with $10 billion or more in total assets would

be included in column G, ‘‘All other loans,

all leases, and all other assets.’’

ies also propose to

consolidate columns B and C of item 10 into

existing column G. The activities covered in

columns B and C pertain to home equity

lines and credit card receivables,

respectively. The amounts previously

reported in columns B and C by institutions

with $10 billion or more in total assets would

be included in column G, ‘‘All other loans,

all leases, and all other assets.’’

(h) Consolidate columns B through F of

item 11, which contain assets sold with

recourse or other seller-provided credit

enhancements and not securitized, into

existing column G. The activities covered in

columns B through F pertain to home equity

lines, credit card receivables, auto loans,

other consumer loans, and commercial and

industrial loans, respectively. The amounts

previously reported in columns B through F

would be included in column G, ‘‘All other

loans, all leases, and all other assets.’’

(i) Consolidate columns B through F of

item 12, which contain the maximum

amount of credit exposure arising from

recourse or other seller-provided credit

enhancements on assets sold with recourse or

other seller-provided credit enhancements

and not securitized, into existing column G.

The activities covered in columns B through

F pertain to home equity lines, credit card

receivables, auto loans, other consumer

loans, and commercial and industrial loans,

respectively. The amounts previously

reported in columns B through F would be

included in column G, ‘‘All other loans, all

leases, and all other assets.’’

redit enhancements

and not securitized, into existing column G.

The activities covered in columns B through

F pertain to home equity lines, credit card

receivables, auto loans, other consumer

loans, and commercial and industrial loans,

respectively. The amounts previously

reported in columns B through F would be

included in column G, ‘‘All other loans, all

leases, and all other assets.’’

(j) Remove Memorandum items 1.a. and 1.b

which contain the outstanding principal

balance and the amount of retained recourse,

respectively, on small business obligations

transferred with recourse under Section 208

of the Riegle Community Development and

Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994. The

amounts previously reported in these two

memorandum items would be included in

items 1 and 2 (column F) or items 11 and 12

(column G) depending on whether the

obligations that had been sold were

securitized or not securitized, respectively.

(k) Create a reporting threshold of $10

billion or more in total assets for reporting

detail on ABCP conduits in Memorandum

items 3.a.(1) through 3.b.(2), and the amount

of outstanding credit card fees and finance

charges included in credit card receivables

sold and securitized with servicing retained

or with recourse or other seller-provided

credit enhancements in Memorandum item 4.

To complete Memorandum item 4, an

institution with $10 billion or more in total

assets would also need to meet one of the

existing criteria for reporting this

information, i.e., the institution, together

with affiliated institutions, has outstanding

credit card receivables that exceed $500

million as of the report date, or the

institution is a credit card specialty bank as

defined for UBPR purposes.

Schedule RC–T

With respect to Schedule RC–T of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

increase the reporting threshold for

reporting the components of fiduciary

and related services income

r

with affiliated institutions, has outstanding

credit card receivables that exceed $500

million as of the report date, or the

institution is a credit card specialty bank as

defined for UBPR purposes.

Schedule RC–T

With respect to Schedule RC–T of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

increase the reporting threshold for

reporting the components of fiduciary

and related services income. For

institutions with total fiduciary assets

greater than $100 million but less than

or equal to $250 million that do not

meet the fiduciary income test for

quarterly reporting,14 the agencies

propose to no longer require the

reporting of items 14 through 26. There

would be no change to the reporting

requirements applicable to items 14

through 26 for all other institutions. The

agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on fiduciary and related

services income from institutions with

less than $250 million in total fiduciary

assets that do not meet the fiduciary

income test.

In addition, the agencies propose to

add a reporting threshold for reporting

the number and market value of

collective investment funds and

common trust funds by type of fund in

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.g. For

institutions at which these funds have a

total market value of less than $1 billion

(as of the preceding December 31), the

agencies propose to no longer require

the reporting of Memorandum items 3.a

through 3.g. Such institutions would

report only the total number and market

value of their collective investment

funds and common trust funds in

Memorandum item 3.h. Institutions at

which the total market value of their

collective investment funds and

common trust funds is $1 billion or

more would continue to report

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.h.

The agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on collective investment

funds and common trust funds in the

Call Report from institutions at which

the total market value of these funds is

less than $1 billion

t

which the total market value of their

collective investment funds and

common trust funds is $1 billion or

more would continue to report

Memorandum items 3.a through 3.h.

The agencies no longer need the current

level of detail on collective investment

funds and common trust funds in the

Call Report from institutions at which

the total market value of these funds is

less than $1 billion.

Schedule RC–V

With respect to Schedule RC–V of the

FFIEC 031, the agencies propose to

consolidate information collected on

consolidated VIEs used as ABCP

conduits (column B) and other VIEs

(column C) for all items into a single

column B covering all VIEs other than

those used as securitization vehicles

(which will continue to be reported in

column A). In lieu of the detailed

breakdown of assets and liabilities of

ABCP conduit VIEs currently reported

in column B, the agencies propose to

collect data on the total assets and total

liabilities of such VIEs in new items 5

and 6, respectively. For these ABCP

conduit VIEs, the total assets item

would include the assets that can be

used only to settle these VIEs’

obligations, which are currently

reported in items 1.a through 1.k,

column B, and all other assets of these

VIEs, which are currently reported in

item 3, column B; the total liabilities

items would include these VIEs’

liabilities for which creditors do not

have recourse to the general credit of the

reporting bank, which are currently

reported in items 2.a through 2.e,

column B, and all other liabilities of

these VIEs, which are currently reported

in item 4, column B.

In the two columns of Schedule RC–

V that would remain, the agencies also

propose to consolidate the VIE

information on held-to-maturity and

available-for-sale securities in items 1.b

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00116

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

Es, which are currently reported

in item 4, column B.

In the two columns of Schedule RC–

V that would remain, the agencies also

propose to consolidate the VIE

information on held-to-maturity and

available-for-sale securities in items 1.b

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00116

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51917

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

15 CAMELS is an acronym that represents the

ratings from six essential components of an

institution’s financial condition and operations:

Capital adequacy, asset quality, management,

earnings, liquidity, and sensitivity to market risk.

These components represent the primary areas

evaluated by examiners during examinations of

institutions.

and 1.c into a single new item 1.b; loans

and leases held for sale, loans and leases

held for investment, and the allowance

for loan and leases losses in items 1.e

through 1.g into a single new item 1.c;

and commercial paper and other

borrowed money in items 2.c and 2.d

into a single new item 2.a. In addition,

the agencies propose to remove the VIE

detail on securities purchased under

agreements to resell in item 1.d, trading

assets (other than derivatives) in item

1.h, and derivative trading assets in item

1.i. The data currently reported in these

items would be included in existing

item 1.k for other assets, which would

be renumbered as item 1.e. The agencies

also propose to remove the VIE detail on

securities sold under agreements to

repurchase in item 2.a and derivative

trading liabilities in item 2.b; these

items would be included in existing

item 2.e for other liabilities, which

would be renumbered as item 2.b. The

agencies propose to consolidate and

remove these items because they no

longer need the current level of detail

on consolidated VIEs in the Call Report.

IV

detail on

securities sold under agreements to

repurchase in item 2.a and derivative

trading liabilities in item 2.b; these

items would be included in existing

item 2.e for other liabilities, which

would be renumbered as item 2.b. The

agencies propose to consolidate and

remove these items because they no

longer need the current level of detail

on consolidated VIEs in the Call Report.

IV. Timing

The agencies propose to make the

changes in this notice effective

beginning with the June 30, 2018, Call

Report. The agencies invite comment on

any difficulties that institutions would

expect to encounter in implementing

the systems and process changes

necessary to accommodate the proposed

revisions to the FFIEC 051, FFIEC 041,

and FFIEC 031 as of this proposed

effective date.

The specific wording of the captions

for the new or revised Call Report data

items discussed in this proposal and the

numbering of these data items should be

regarded as preliminary.

V. Request for Comment

Public comment is requested on all

aspects of this joint notice. Comment is

specifically invited on:

(a) Whether the proposed revisions to

the collections of information that are

the subject of this notice are necessary

for the proper performance of the

agencies’ functions, including whether

the information has practical utility;

(b) The accuracy of the agencies’

estimates of the burden of the

information collections as they are

proposed to be revised, including the

validity of the methodology and

assumptions used;

(c) Ways to enhance the quality,

utility, and clarity of the information to

be collected;

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of

information collections on respondents,

including through the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology; and

tion collections as they are

proposed to be revised, including the

validity of the methodology and

assumptions used;

(c) Ways to enhance the quality,

utility, and clarity of the information to

be collected;

(d) Ways to minimize the burden of

information collections on respondents,

including through the use of automated

collection techniques or other forms of

information technology; and

(e) Estimates of capital or start-up

costs and costs of operation,

maintenance, and purchase of services

to provide information.

Comments submitted in response to

this joint notice will be shared among

the agencies. All comments will become

a matter of public record.

Appendix A

Summary of the FFIEC Member Entities’

Uses of the Data Items in the Call Report

Schedules in the Portion of the User Surveys

Evaluated in the Development of This

Proposal

Schedule RI–A (Changes in Bank Equity

Capital)

Schedule RI–A collects detailed

information about specified categories of

changes in an institution’s equity capital

during the calendar year to date. In general,

these categories are aligned with categories

typically reported on a basic statement of

changes in equity in a set of financial

statements prepared under U.S. generally

accepted accounting principles (GAAP).

The FFIEC member entities’ examiners use

the Schedule RI–A information in their off-

site reviews to identify and understand the

sources of any significant changes in an

institution’s capital accounts. Information on

dividends declared as a percentage of net

income reveals the extent to which capital is

being augmented through earnings retention,

which is the principal source of capital for

most institutions. The banking agencies may

be aware of some capital transactions

reported in Schedule RI–A due to licensing

requirements

any significant changes in an

institution’s capital accounts. Information on

dividends declared as a percentage of net

income reveals the extent to which capital is

being augmented through earnings retention,

which is the principal source of capital for

most institutions. The banking agencies may

be aware of some capital transactions

reported in Schedule RI–A due to licensing

requirements. However, for many other

transactions directly affecting capital such as

dividends declared and transactions with a

parent holding company, Schedule RI–A may

be the only source of information on changes

in capital aside from an on-site examination.

Even for capital transactions that require

prior agency approval, the information

reported in Schedule RI–A serves as

confirmation that the institution successfully

completed the transaction (such as issuing

new stock or redeeming existing preferred

stock). The agencies also use the information

on this schedule as a starting point for

reviewing compliance with statutory or

regulatory restrictions on dividends or

holding company transactions.

The FDIC uses data items from Schedule

RI–A in its estimates of losses from failures

of insured depository institutions, which

affects the FDIC’s loss reserve and the

resulting level of the balance in the Deposit

Insurance Fund.

Schedule RI–C (Disaggregated Data on the

Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses) [FFIEC

031 and FFIEC 041 only]

Schedule RI–C provides information on the

components of the allowance for loan and

lease losses (ALLL) by loan category

disaggregated on the basis of a reporting

institution’s impairment measurement

method and the related recorded investment

in loans (and, as applicable, leases) held for

investment for institutions with $1 billion or

more in total assets. The information

required to be reported in Schedule RI–C is

consistent with disclosures required under

existing U.S

lease losses (ALLL) by loan category

disaggregated on the basis of a reporting

institution’s impairment measurement

method and the related recorded investment

in loans (and, as applicable, leases) held for

investment for institutions with $1 billion or

more in total assets. The information

required to be reported in Schedule RI–C is

consistent with disclosures required under

existing U.S. GAAP in Financial Accounting

Standards Board (FASB) Accounting

Standards Codification (ASC) paragraphs

310–10–50–11B(g) and (h).

By providing this level of detail on an

individual institution’s overall ALLL, which

supports the identification of changes in its

components over time, examiners can better

perform off-site monitoring of activity within

the ALLL in periods between examinations

and when planning for examinations. Thus,

the Schedule RI–C information enables

examiners and agency analysts to determine

whether the institution is releasing loan loss

allowances in some loan categories and

building allowances in others. Furthermore,

changes from period to period in the volume

of individually evaluated loans that have

been determined to be impaired in each loan

category, and the allowance allocations to

these impaired loans, provide examiners and

analysts with an indicator of trends in the

institution’s credit quality. This

understanding is critical to the agencies since

the ALLL, and the direction of changes in its

composition, is one of the key factors in

determining an institution’s financial

condition.

The detailed ALLL information collected

in Schedule RI–C allows the agencies to more

finely focus efforts related to the analysis of

the ALLL and credit risk management

institution’s credit quality. This

understanding is critical to the agencies since

the ALLL, and the direction of changes in its

composition, is one of the key factors in

determining an institution’s financial

condition.

The detailed ALLL information collected

in Schedule RI–C allows the agencies to more

finely focus efforts related to the analysis of

the ALLL and credit risk management. By

reviewing the data collected in Schedule RI–

C on allowance allocations by loan category

in conjunction with the past due and

nonaccrual data reported by loan category (in

Schedule RC–N) that are used in a general

assessment of an institution’s credit risk

exposures, the agencies can better evaluate

whether the overall level of its ALLL, and its

allocations by loan category, appear

appropriate or whether supervisory follow-

up is warranted. Together, the ALLL

information and past due and nonaccrual

data factor into the assessment of the Asset

Quality component of the CAMELS rating.15

As an example, by using the detailed

information on the ALLL allocated to

commercial real estate (CRE) loans,

examiners and analysts can better understand

how institutions with CRE concentrations are

building or releasing allowances, the extent

of ALLL coverage in relation to their CRE

portfolios, and how this might differ among

institutions.

Schedule RI–C also assists the agencies in

understanding industry trends related to the

build-up or release of allowances for specific

loan categories. The information supports

comparisons of ALLL levels by loan category,

including the identification of differences in

ALLL allocations by institution size.

Understanding how institutions’ ALLL

practices and allocations differ over time for

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00117

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

The information supports

comparisons of ALLL levels by loan category,

including the identification of differences in

ALLL allocations by institution size.

Understanding how institutions’ ALLL

practices and allocations differ over time for

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00117

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51918

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

particular loan categories as economic

conditions change provides insight that can

be used to more finely tune supervisory

procedures and policies.

Schedule RC–A (Cash and Balances Due

from Depository Institutions) [FFIEC 031 and

FFIEC 041 only]

Schedule RC–A provides data on currency

and coin, cash items, balances due from U.S.

and foreign depository institutions, and

balances due from Federal Reserve Banks.

This information, particularly from larger

institutions, is utilized for monetary policy

purposes and liquidity analysis purposes.

For monetary policy purposes, information

from Schedule RC–A is needed for analysis

of the relationship between institutions’ cash

assets and the federal funds market, and in

the construction of the monetary aggregates

and weekly estimates of cash assets. The

Board, in conducting monetary policy,

monitors shifts between cash accounts and

federal funds as a measure of the

effectiveness of policy initiatives. For

example, differences in interest rates paid on

balances due from Federal Reserve Banks

compared to those available in the federal

funds market cause shifts in the relative

volumes of funds institutions hold in their

Federal Reserve Bank accounts and federal

funds sold. This can be seen in the

significant shrinkage in the federal funds

market over the past ten years that has been

offset by increases in cash assets held

st rates paid on

balances due from Federal Reserve Banks

compared to those available in the federal

funds market cause shifts in the relative

volumes of funds institutions hold in their

Federal Reserve Bank accounts and federal

funds sold. This can be seen in the

significant shrinkage in the federal funds

market over the past ten years that has been

offset by increases in cash assets held. As

monetary policy normalizes and rates in the

federal funds market increase, data in

Schedule RC–A will allow the Board to

analyze how cash assets would change as the

federal funds market responds to the

movement in rates.

Schedule RC–A data also serve as inputs

into the construction of the monetary

aggregates and in deriving estimates of cash

assets on a weekly frequency. Cash items

reported in item 1 are utilized as netting

components in constructing the monetary

aggregates. Items for cash and balances due

from depository institutions are utilized to

benchmark comparable weekly data collected

by the Board from a sample of both small and

large depository institutions. These weekly

estimates provide timely input for more

effective monitoring of institutions’ cash

asset positions.

Schedule RC–A provides information

about the most liquid balance sheet accounts

available to satisfy unexpected cash outflows.

Thus, information reported on balances due

from depository institutions, including those

representing correspondent banking

balances, are a key element in the agencies’

analysis of an institution’s management of

liquidity risk. Such balances serve to pay the

institution’s daily cash letters and must be

maintained at sufficient levels to cover these

obligations in the normal course of business.

At the same time, information from Schedule

RC–A is particularly important for the

agencies’ evaluations of an institution’s

ability to effectively respond to liquidity

stress

an institution’s management of

liquidity risk. Such balances serve to pay the

institution’s daily cash letters and must be

maintained at sufficient levels to cover these

obligations in the normal course of business.

At the same time, information from Schedule

RC–A is particularly important for the

agencies’ evaluations of an institution’s

ability to effectively respond to liquidity

stress. Although other balance sheet assets,

such as debt securities, are secondary sources

of liquidity under normal operating

conditions, examiners consider the

availability of on-balance sheet cash and due

from balances under a highly stressed

operating environment. Given the volatility

of liability funding sources, agency

supervisory staff assess the demands of a

potential liquidity crisis in comparison to the

availability of funds from due from balances.

Because the amount of liquid assets that an

institution should maintain is a function of

the stability of its funding structure and the

risk characteristics of its balance sheet and

off-balance sheet activities, examiners

monitor the level of cash and due from

balances, and changes therein from period to

period, by using data from Schedule RC–A as

part of their off-site analyses of liquidity risk.

The results of these analyses may influence

the supervisory strategy for an institution and

is an input into examination planning

activities necessary for scoping and staffing

the evaluation of liquidity and funds

management during examinations.

The separate breakout of balances due from

banks in foreign countries and foreign central

banks in Schedule RC–A also aids the

agencies in assessing liquidity risk arising

from additional or distinct banking laws and

regulations in foreign countries and in

evaluating the currency risk and country risk

associated with these balances

on of liquidity and funds

management during examinations.

The separate breakout of balances due from

banks in foreign countries and foreign central

banks in Schedule RC–A also aids the

agencies in assessing liquidity risk arising

from additional or distinct banking laws and

regulations in foreign countries and in

evaluating the currency risk and country risk

associated with these balances.

Schedule RC–F (Other Assets)

Schedule RC–F collects a breakdown of

assets not reported in other balance sheet

asset categories, such as deferred tax assets,

equity securities without readily

determinable fair values, and life insurance

assets. This information is used in off-site

monitoring and for pre-examination

planning. A trend of rapid growth in or a

significant change in the reported amount of

an individual category of other assets that is

identified through off-site monitoring may

represent an area of potential concern or

heightened risk and require further review

and assessment, either upon identification or

at the next examination.

For example, a significant increase in the

level of accrued interest receivable may be

indicative of deterioration in the repayment

capacity of an institution’s borrowers or a

relaxation of management’s loan collection

policies and practices, which would signal

an increase in overall credit risk. Growth in

the amount of net deferred tax assets,

particularly at an institution with cumulative

losses in recent years, raises questions about

the realizability of these assets and whether

the need for a valuation allowance has been

properly assessed. The importance of

ensuring the appropriateness of the reported

amount of these assets is also tied to the

deductions and limits that apply to deferred

tax assets under the agencies’ regulatory

capital rules

institution with cumulative

losses in recent years, raises questions about

the realizability of these assets and whether

the need for a valuation allowance has been

properly assessed. The importance of

ensuring the appropriateness of the reported

amount of these assets is also tied to the

deductions and limits that apply to deferred

tax assets under the agencies’ regulatory

capital rules. Examiners use information on

the volume of interest-only strips receivable

in their pre-examination scoping of an

institution’s interest rate risk to determine

the extent of this risk in preparation for an

on-site assessment. Because bank-owned life

insurance exposes an institution to liquidity,

operational, credit, interest rate, and other

risks, examiners need to identify significant

holdings of life insurance assets and growth

in such holdings. In these circumstances,

examiners evaluate management’s adherence

to prudent concentration limits for life

insurance assets and management’s

performance of comprehensive assessments

of the risks of these assets, either on an off-

site basis or during examinations.

Information on those individual

components of all other assets that exceed

the Schedule RC–F disclosure threshold

helps examiners evaluate the significance of

these items to the overall composition of the

balance sheet and identify risk exposures

associated with these assets. For example,

when examiners find the reported amount of

repossessed assets at an institution to be

increasing, these data, taken together with

data on the volume of past due and

nonaccrual loans reported in Schedule RC–

N, may signal credit deterioration and the

need for examiner follow-up with

management. Data on repossessed assets also

are used for the scoping of targeted consumer

compliance examinations, particularly with

respect to auto loan origination and

servicing

itution to be

increasing, these data, taken together with

data on the volume of past due and

nonaccrual loans reported in Schedule RC–

N, may signal credit deterioration and the

need for examiner follow-up with

management. Data on repossessed assets also

are used for the scoping of targeted consumer

compliance examinations, particularly with

respect to auto loan origination and

servicing.

Data on accrued interest receivable also are

used in the FDIC’s model that estimates

losses arising from the failure of problem

institutions, which affects the measurement

of the balance of the Deposit Insurance Fund.

Schedule RC–G (Other Liabilities)

Schedule RC–G collects a breakdown of

liabilities not reported in other balance sheet

liability categories, such as interest accrued

and unpaid on deposits, net deferred tax

liabilities, and the allowance for credit losses

on off-balance sheet exposures. As with the

other assets data collected in Schedule RC–

F, information reported in Schedule RC–G is

used in off-site monitoring and for pre-

examination planning. A trend of rapid

growth in or a significant change in the

reported amount of an individual category of

other liabilities that is identified through off-

site monitoring may represent an area of

potential concern or heightened risk and

require further review and assessment, either

upon identification or at the next

examination.

For example, a significant increase or

decrease in the interest accrued and unpaid

on deposits would warrant examiner follow-

up to determine the cause for this change

from previous levels because it could

indicate a change in an institution’s funding

strategy with a consequential effect on its

future earnings and its interest rate risk

exposure

identification or at the next

examination.

For example, a significant increase or

decrease in the interest accrued and unpaid

on deposits would warrant examiner follow-

up to determine the cause for this change

from previous levels because it could

indicate a change in an institution’s funding

strategy with a consequential effect on its

future earnings and its interest rate risk

exposure. Examiner assessments of material

increases in the allowance for off-balance

sheet credit exposures are performed to

determine whether this reflects credit quality

deterioration on the part of existing

customers to whom credit has been extended,

a loosening of underwriting practices for

granting or renewing lines of credit, or other

factors, especially at banks with significant

credit card operations or other unfunded

commitments.

Information on those individual

components of all other liabilities that exceed

the Schedule RC–G disclosure threshold

helps examiners evaluate the significance of

these items to the overall composition of the

balance sheet and identify risk exposures

associated with these liabilities. For example,

an increase in the amount of derivatives with

negative fair values, considering changes in

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00118

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51919

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

the notional amounts of derivatives reported

in Schedule RC–L (on the FFIEC 031 or

FFIEC 041) or Schedule SU (on the FFIEC

051), would lead to examiner review of an

institution’s hedging activities and their

effectiveness in offsetting identified hedged

risks or its strategy for entering into

derivatives transactions for purposes other

than hedging because of the resulting

negative impact on earnings

amounts of derivatives reported

in Schedule RC–L (on the FFIEC 031 or

FFIEC 041) or Schedule SU (on the FFIEC

051), would lead to examiner review of an

institution’s hedging activities and their

effectiveness in offsetting identified hedged

risks or its strategy for entering into

derivatives transactions for purposes other

than hedging because of the resulting

negative impact on earnings. Because

deferred compensation liabilities create

funding obligations, growth in the amount of

these liabilities that triggers disclosure in

Schedule RC–G warrants examiner review to

ensure that management is properly planning

for the funding mechanisms to be used to

satisfy these compensation arrangements.

Data on interest accrued and unpaid on

deposits also are used in the FDIC’s model

that estimates losses arising from the failure

of problem institutions, which affects the

measurement of the Deposit Insurance Fund.

Schedule RC–H (Selected Balance Sheet

Items for Domestic Offices) [FFIEC 031 Only]

Schedule RC–H provides data on selected

balance sheet items held in domestic offices

only, and complements domestic office

information collected in Schedule RC–C, Part

I (Loans and Leases), Column B, and in

Schedule RC–A (Cash and Balances Due from

Depository Institutions), Column B. This

domestic office level information is utilized

for monetary policy and supervisory risk

assessment purposes.

In general, Board policymakers set U.S.

monetary policy to influence economic

activity and financial market conditions in

the United States. The domestic office

components of the balance sheet items in

Schedule RC–H and elsewhere in the Call

Report are used in this context to assess

credit availability, banks’ funding patterns,

liquidity, and investment strategies in the

United States. For example, if the level of an

institution’s consolidated holdings of U.S

nomic

activity and financial market conditions in

the United States. The domestic office

components of the balance sheet items in

Schedule RC–H and elsewhere in the Call

Report are used in this context to assess

credit availability, banks’ funding patterns,

liquidity, and investment strategies in the

United States. For example, if the level of an

institution’s consolidated holdings of U.S.

Treasury securities were increasing, but upon

further review a significant portion of the

growth reflected a rise in the amount of the

institution’s securities that are held in its

foreign offices, such growth would not

constitute direct support of either increased

liquidity or a change in investment strategy

at the institution’s domestic offices.

Moreover, in that case, such growth would

not constitute an increase in the Board’s U.S.

bank credit aggregate, which is based on

domestic-office-only holdings of institutions’

securities and loans. Without the domestic-

offices-only component of U.S. Treasury

securities, the interpretation of increases in

such securities holdings would be

unnecessarily complicated; it would

otherwise be unclear to policymakers,

analysts, and others whether such growth

had in fact reflected stimulation of the U.S.

economy in the form of U.S. bank credit.

For institutions with foreign and domestic

operations, the division of assets and funding

between foreign and domestic components is

a key element of an institution’s risk profile.

For example, the levels of funding and assets

at such an institution that are subject to

potentially more restrictive foreign laws and

regulations and to currency risk and other

transactional risks define a major portion of

the institution’s risk profile. In addition, data

on the volume of assets and liabilities by

balance sheet category in domestic versus

foreign offices is essential for planning and

staffing examinations of institutions with

foreign offices

t are subject to

potentially more restrictive foreign laws and

regulations and to currency risk and other

transactional risks define a major portion of

the institution’s risk profile. In addition, data

on the volume of assets and liabilities by

balance sheet category in domestic versus

foreign offices is essential for planning and

staffing examinations of institutions with

foreign offices.

Schedule RC–I (Assets and Liabilities of IBFs)

[FFIEC 031 Only]

Schedule RC–I requires the reporting, on a

fully consolidated basis, of the total assets

and liabilities of all International Banking

Facilities (IBFs) established by the reporting

institution, i.e., including any IBFs

established by the institution itself or by its

Edge or Agreement subsidiaries. An IBF is a

set of asset and liability accounts, segregated

on the books and records of the establishing

entity, which reflect permitted international

transactions. IBF activities are essentially

limited to accepting deposits from and

extending credit to foreign residents

(including banks), other IBFs, and the

institutions establishing the IBF. The general

purpose of the collection of these two

Schedule RC–I data items is to aid in the

planning of examinations on the risks and

activities associated with international

lending, financing instruments, and

international banking conducted through an

IBF. These two data items also serve as high

level indicators of institutions’ engagement

in such activities between examinations.

There is no other source of information on

the total assets and liabilities of U.S. banking

institutions’ IBFs

examinations on the risks and

activities associated with international

lending, financing instruments, and

international banking conducted through an

IBF. These two data items also serve as high

level indicators of institutions’ engagement

in such activities between examinations.

There is no other source of information on

the total assets and liabilities of U.S. banking

institutions’ IBFs.

Schedule RC–P (1–4 Family Residential

Mortgage Banking Activities in Domestic

Offices) [FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041 only]

For institutions that meet an activity-based

reporting threshold associated with their

mortgage banking activities in domestic

offices, Schedule RC–P provides data on their

originations, purchases, and sales of closed-

end and open-end 1–4 family residential

mortgages during the quarter. Institutions

providing data in Schedule RC–P also report

the amount of closed-end and open-end 1–4

family residential mortgage loans held for

sale or trading at quarter-end as well as the

noninterest income for the quarter from the

sale, securitization, and servicing of these

mortgage loans. For open-end mortgage

loans, institutions report the total

commitment under the line of credit. These

data are collected to enhance the agencies’

ability to monitor the nature and extent of

institutions’ involvement with 1–4 family

residential mortgage loans as originators,

sellers, and servicers of such loans.

Since mortgage banking accounts for a

large source of income at many institutions,

concentrations of activities in this area pose

several types of risks. These risks include

operational, credit, interest rate, and liquidity

risks, evaluations of which are critical in

assigning appropriate CAMELS ratings for an

institution. Therefore, the agencies monitor

and analyze the Schedule RC–P data on

institutions’ mortgage banking activities to

support their assessments of various risk

components of CAMELS ratings

area pose

several types of risks. These risks include

operational, credit, interest rate, and liquidity

risks, evaluations of which are critical in

assigning appropriate CAMELS ratings for an

institution. Therefore, the agencies monitor

and analyze the Schedule RC–P data on

institutions’ mortgage banking activities to

support their assessments of various risk

components of CAMELS ratings. For

example, 1–4 family residential mortgage

banking activities may include an

institution’s obligation to repurchase

mortgage loans that it has sold or otherwise

indemnify the loan purchaser against loss

due to borrower defaults, loan defects, other

breaches of representations and warranties,

or other reasons, thereby exposing the

institution to additional risk. To monitor this

exposure, Schedule RC–P collects data on 1–

4 family residential mortgage loan

repurchases and indemnifications during the

quarter as well as representation and

warranty reserves for such loans that have

been sold. If off-site analysis of the reported

data on repurchases and indemnifications

reveals substantial increases in recent

periods, this would be a red flag for

supervisory questions about the credit and

operational risks arising from the

institution’s mortgage loan originations and

purchases as well as its ability to fund a

higher level of loan repurchases going

forward than it may be accustomed to

repurchase. Examiner review of the

appropriateness of the level of representation

and warranty reserves and the institution’s

methodology for estimating the amount of

these reserves also would be warranted.

In addition, the data reported in Schedule

RC–P are used in the ongoing monitoring of

the current volume, growth, and profitability

of institutions’ 1–4 family residential

mortgage banking activities

miner review of the

appropriateness of the level of representation

and warranty reserves and the institution’s

methodology for estimating the amount of

these reserves also would be warranted.

In addition, the data reported in Schedule

RC–P are used in the ongoing monitoring of

the current volume, growth, and profitability

of institutions’ 1–4 family residential

mortgage banking activities. In this regard,

significant growth in these activities over a

short period of time, particularly in relation

to the size of an institution, raises

supervisory concerns as to whether the

institution has implemented appropriate risk

management processes, controls, and

governance over its mortgage banking

business. The extent of the increased level of

activity will determine the nature and timing

of the supervisory follow-up. More generally,

for examiners, the off-site monitoring of the

Schedule RC–S data and related metrics and

trends provides key information for

examination scoping and helps determine the

allocation of mortgage-banking specialists’

time during on-site examinations.

A substantial volume of loans and other

assets held for sale in a market where the

assets may not be able to be readily sold can

cause significant liquidity strain because of

the institution’s need for funding to carry

these assets for a greater length of time than

had been anticipated. Thus, the agencies use

data from Schedule RC–P when assessing an

institution’s liquidity position by monitoring

and analyzing the extent of mortgages held

for sale or trading. If there is significant

growth in the amount of such mortgage

holdings, particularly when the Schedule

RC–P data reveal larger amounts of

originations and purchases compared to

sales, this would be an indicator that the

acquired loans are not selling and a basis for

supervisory follow-up

ion’s liquidity position by monitoring

and analyzing the extent of mortgages held

for sale or trading. If there is significant

growth in the amount of such mortgage

holdings, particularly when the Schedule

RC–P data reveal larger amounts of

originations and purchases compared to

sales, this would be an indicator that the

acquired loans are not selling and a basis for

supervisory follow-up.

From a consumer compliance perspective,

the agencies use Schedule RC–P data to

monitor mortgage-related metrics for

assessing potential risks to consumers, and

for the scheduling and scoping of

examinations. Additionally, the agencies rely

on Schedule RC–P data for assessing an

institution’s product lines for compliance

with the Community Reinvestment Act and

other fair lending regulations, particularly if

the institution engages in wholesale

originations of mortgage loans.

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00119

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51920

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

Schedule RC–Q—Assets and Liabilities

Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

[FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041 only]

FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value

Measurement, provides guidance on how to

measure fair value and establishes a three-

level hierarchy for measuring fair value. This

hierarchy prioritizes inputs used to measure

fair value based on observability, giving the

highest priority to quoted prices in active

markets for identical assets or liabilities

(Level 1) and the lowest priority to

unobservable inputs (Level 3).

Under ASC Subtopic 825–10, Financial

Instruments—Overall, ASC Subtopic 815–15,

Derivatives and Hedging—Embedded

Derivatives, and ASC Subtopic 860–50,

Transfers and Servicing—Servicing Assets

and Liabilities, an institution may elect to

report certain assets and liabilities at fair

value with changes in fair value recognized

in earnings

he lowest priority to

unobservable inputs (Level 3).

Under ASC Subtopic 825–10, Financial

Instruments—Overall, ASC Subtopic 815–15,

Derivatives and Hedging—Embedded

Derivatives, and ASC Subtopic 860–50,

Transfers and Servicing—Servicing Assets

and Liabilities, an institution may elect to

report certain assets and liabilities at fair

value with changes in fair value recognized

in earnings. This election is generally

referred to as the fair value option. Under

U.S. GAAP, certain other assets and

liabilities are required to be measured at fair

value on a recurring basis.

Institutions that have elected to apply the

fair value option or have reported $10

million or more in total trading assets in any

of the four preceding calendar quarters must

report in Schedule RC–Q the amount of

assets and liabilities, by major categories, that

are measured at fair value on a recurring

basis in the financial statements, along with

separate disclosure of the amount of such

assets and liabilities whose fair values were

estimated under each of the three levels of

the FASB’s fair value hierarchy.

Agency staff use the information on assets

reported at fair value in Schedule RC–Q to

calibrate and estimate the impact of

regulatory capital policy, as well as evaluate

contemplated capital policy changes. The

agencies also use the Schedule RC–Q data

(particularly the volume of fair value option

assets and liabilities in relation to total assets

and total capital, whether the volume has

significantly increased, and whether the

option has begun to be applied to new

categories of assets or liabilities) to assist

with planning the proper scoping and

staffing of risk management safety and

soundness examinations given the critical

importance of robust risk management and

control processes around fair value

measurement

to total assets

and total capital, whether the volume has

significantly increased, and whether the

option has begun to be applied to new

categories of assets or liabilities) to assist

with planning the proper scoping and

staffing of risk management safety and

soundness examinations given the critical

importance of robust risk management and

control processes around fair value

measurement. For available-for-sale

securities and fair value option loans, agency

staff can also compare the fair values

reported in Schedule RC–Q with the

amortized cost and unpaid principal balance,

respectively, reported for these assets in the

Call Report to understand the extent and

direction of these measurement differences

and their potential effect on regulatory

capital should a substantial portion of these

assets need to be sold. The agencies also use

this information to evaluate the extent of

Level 3 fair value measurements of certain

assets and liabilities because of the extensive

use of unobservable inputs to estimate these

fair values, as well as to monitor trading asset

valuations and shifts in the fair value

hierarchy valuation levels among trading

assets over time and across capital markets.

Information in Schedule RC–Q is also used

by agency examination staff to analyze

capital, asset quality, earnings, and liquidity

components of CAMELS. The agencies also

use data reported in Schedule RC–Q in credit

risk management tools. Obtaining these data

on a quarterly basis allows for closer

monitoring of credit risk changes affecting

assets measured at fair value. The data are

also used to monitor bank performance,

emerging trends, and certain mortgage

servicing assets.

Schedule RC–S (Servicing, Securitization,

and Asset Sale Activities) [FFIEC 031 and

FFIEC 041]

Schedule RC–S collects data on servicing,

securitization, and asset sale activities. The

majority of these data represents off-balance

sheet activities

ing

assets measured at fair value. The data are

also used to monitor bank performance,

emerging trends, and certain mortgage

servicing assets.

Schedule RC–S (Servicing, Securitization,

and Asset Sale Activities) [FFIEC 031 and

FFIEC 041]

Schedule RC–S collects data on servicing,

securitization, and asset sale activities. The

majority of these data represents off-balance

sheet activities. The agencies use the data

provided in this schedule primarily for risk

identification and examination scoping

purposes.

Exposures reported in Schedule RC–S can

affect an institution’s liquidity outlook. For

example, if an institution has a commitment

to provide liquidity to its own or other

institutions’ securitization structures or has

provided credit enhancements in the form of

recourse or standby letters of credit for assets

it has sold or securitized, the agencies need

to consider such funding commitments to

properly monitor and assess the full scope of

an institution’s liquidity position. This

schedule also captures past due amounts for

loans the reporting institution has sold and

securitized on which it has retained servicing

or has provided recourse or other credit

enhancements. This past due information,

and trends in the past due amounts, are

critical to the agencies’ ability to evaluate the

credit quality of the underlying assets in

securitization structures on an off-site basis

and timely identify any credit quality

deterioration for supervisory follow-up,

including, if applicable, the effect of

increased servicing costs on current and

forecasted earnings. Defaulting assets

underlying securitization structures played a

major role during the recent financial crisis,

so it is imperative the agencies have the

information necessary to continuously

monitor the performance of these assets

ny credit quality

deterioration for supervisory follow-up,

including, if applicable, the effect of

increased servicing costs on current and

forecasted earnings. Defaulting assets

underlying securitization structures played a

major role during the recent financial crisis,

so it is imperative the agencies have the

information necessary to continuously

monitor the performance of these assets.

The agencies also use Schedule RC–S data

to analyze whether an institution has

adequate capital to cover losses arising from

liquidity commitments or recourse

obligations if the underlying assets in

securitizations begin to default, especially in

the event of an economic downturn. In

addition, on an industry-wide basis, changes

in the level of activity reported in the various

items of this schedule enables the agencies to

identify emerging trends within the

securitization sector, which supports the

development, as needed, of supervisory

policies and related guidance for institutions

and examiners.

Schedule RC–S is also used by the agencies

to prepare for on-site examinations.

Specifically, the level of activity reported in

Schedule RC–S helps the agencies make

examination resource decisions, such as

whether capital markets or consumer

compliance specialists are needed on-site.

(Consumer compliance regulations apply to

loans an institution continues to service after

sale or securitization.) For example, in the

event there are increasing amounts of past

due loans that an institution has sold and

securitized, additional resources can be

allocated to examining the institution’s

lending policies and practices and internal

controls.

Schedule RC–T (Fiduciary and Related

Services)

Schedule RC–T collects data on fiduciary

assets and accounts, income generated from

those accounts and other fiduciary services,

and related fiduciary activities

t

due loans that an institution has sold and

securitized, additional resources can be

allocated to examining the institution’s

lending policies and practices and internal

controls.

Schedule RC–T (Fiduciary and Related

Services)

Schedule RC–T collects data on fiduciary

assets and accounts, income generated from

those accounts and other fiduciary services,

and related fiduciary activities. The amount

of data reported in Schedule RC–T and the

frequency of reporting varies depending on

an institution’s total fiduciary assets and its

fiduciary income. The most detail, including

income information, is provided quarterly by

institutions that have more than $250 million

in fiduciary assets or meet a fiduciary income

test; other trust institutions report less

information in Schedule RC–T annually as of

December 31.

Trust services are an integral part of the

banking business for more than 20 percent of

all institutions. The granularity of the data in

Schedule RC–T, especially for the types of

managed assets held in fiduciary accounts,

aids the agencies in determining the

complexity of an institution’s fiduciary

services risk profile. Furthermore, the

agencies use Schedule RC–T data to monitor

changes in the volume and character of

discretionary trust activity and the volume of

nondiscretionary trust activity at a trust

institution, which facilitates their assessment

of the nature and risks of the institution’s

fiduciary activities. The institution’s risk

profile in these areas is considered during

pre-examination planning to determine the

appropriate scoping and staffing for trust

examinations.

The Schedule RC–T data also are used

when examiners consider the ratings to be

assigned to trust institutions under the

Uniform Interagency Trust Rating System

(UITRS). The UITRS considers certain

managerial, operational, financial, and

compliance factors that are common to all

institutions with fiduciary activities

o determine the

appropriate scoping and staffing for trust

examinations.

The Schedule RC–T data also are used

when examiners consider the ratings to be

assigned to trust institutions under the

Uniform Interagency Trust Rating System

(UITRS). The UITRS considers certain

managerial, operational, financial, and

compliance factors that are common to all

institutions with fiduciary activities. Under

this system, the supervisory agencies

endeavor to ensure that all institutions with

fiduciary activities are evaluated in a

comprehensive and uniform manner, and

that supervisory attention is appropriately

focused on those institutions exhibiting

weaknesses in their fiduciary operations.

Schedule RC–T provides a breakdown of

the amount and number of managed and non-

managed accounts by the types of different

trust accounts. Personal trusts, employee

benefit trusts, and corporate trusts are

reported separately because of their

substantive differences in nature and risk.

Having a detailed breakdown between

managed and non-managed accounts is

critical because managed accounts have

greater levels of investment, legal,

reputational, and compliance risks compared

to non-managed accounts, and require more

supervisory oversight. This account

information supports examination scoping

and staffing because the evaluation of

different types of trust accounts requires

differences in expertise.

Data reported by larger trust institutions on

fiduciary and related services income and on

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00120

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

nformation supports examination scoping

and staffing because the evaluation of

different types of trust accounts requires

differences in expertise.

Data reported by larger trust institutions on

fiduciary and related services income and on

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00120

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51921

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

fiduciary settlements, surcharges, and other

losses provide information on the overall

profitability of the institution’s fiduciary

activities and supports the assessment of the

Earnings component of the UITRS rating.

These assessments consider such factors as

the profitability of fiduciary activities in

relation to the size and scope of the

institution’s trust product lines and its

overall trust business. In addition, fiduciary

settlements, surcharges, and other losses

signal mishandling, operational failure, or

fraud, which pose higher than normal risk

exposure to the institution and raise

questions for supervisory follow-up about the

effectiveness of the institution’s controls over

its fiduciary activities. These data also are

monitored off-site and used to make interim

rating changes in the UITRS Earnings rating

between scheduled examinations.

Data in the Schedule RC–T Memorandum

items include the market values of managed

assets held in fiduciary accounts by type of

account and asset class and the number of

collective investment funds and common

trust funds and the market value of fund

assets by type of fund. The exercise of

investment discretion adds a significant

element of risk to the administration of

managed fiduciary accounts

in the Schedule RC–T Memorandum

items include the market values of managed

assets held in fiduciary accounts by type of

account and asset class and the number of

collective investment funds and common

trust funds and the market value of fund

assets by type of fund. The exercise of

investment discretion adds a significant

element of risk to the administration of

managed fiduciary accounts. The

breakdowns by asset class and type of fund

enable the agencies to monitor trends, both

on a trust industry-wide basis and an

individual trust institution basis, in how

institutions with investment discretion are

investing the assets of managed accounts and

investment funds. The market value

breakdowns of managed assets by asset class

provide an indicator of complexity by

separating more complex and hard-to-value

assets that carry higher levels of risk from

those assets that pose less risk. These data

also contribute to effective examination

scoping and staffing so that trust examiners

can be assigned, and their time allocated, to

examining those more complex and higher

risk activities in which they have expertise.

For example, the separately reported

managed asset classes of real estate mortgages

and real estate are distinctly different asset

classes with different risk and return profiles,

cash flows, and liquidity characteristics.

Thus, concentrations in either of these asset

classes may inform the supervisory strategy

for managed fiduciary accounts, including

the level of specialized expertise that may be

required when there are concentrations in

these asset classes.

Trust institutions also report the number of

corporate and municipal debt issues for

which the institution serves as trustee that

are in substantive default and the

outstanding principal amount of these debt

issues. A substantive default occurs when the

issuer fails to make a required payment of

interest or principal, defaults on a required

payment into a sinking fund, or is declared

bankrupt or insolvent

s also report the number of

corporate and municipal debt issues for

which the institution serves as trustee that

are in substantive default and the

outstanding principal amount of these debt

issues. A substantive default occurs when the

issuer fails to make a required payment of

interest or principal, defaults on a required

payment into a sinking fund, or is declared

bankrupt or insolvent. The occurrence of a

substantive default significantly raises the

risk profile for the institution serving as an

indenture trustee of a defaulted issue and can

result in the incurrence of significant

expenses and the distraction of managerial

time and attention from other areas of trust

administration. Thus, by monitoring the

corporate trust data reported in Schedule

RC–T between examinations, the agencies are

able to identify changes in the risk profile of

institutions acting as indenture trustees for

timely supervisory follow-up and appropriate

examination scoping and staffing.

The existence of fiduciary activities

reported in Schedule RC–T may result in

scoping certain areas of review into a

consumer compliance examination, such as

privacy and incentive-based cross-selling.

The schedule also contains essential

information for statistical and analytical

purposes, including calculating the OCC

assessments for independent trust banks.

Schedule RC–V (Variable Interest Entities)

[FFIEC 031 and FFIEC 041 only]

Schedule RC–V collects information on an

institution’s consolidated variable interest

entities (VIEs) as defined by FASB ASC

Topic 810, Consolidation. The data are used

in determining the extent to which an

institution’s VIEs have been created as

securitization vehicles to pool and repackage

mortgages, other assets, or other credit

exposures into securities that have been or

can be transferred to investors or for other

purposes

institution’s consolidated variable interest

entities (VIEs) as defined by FASB ASC

Topic 810, Consolidation. The data are used

in determining the extent to which an

institution’s VIEs have been created as

securitization vehicles to pool and repackage

mortgages, other assets, or other credit

exposures into securities that have been or

can be transferred to investors or for other

purposes. Examiners and reviewers can

quantify the level of cash and noninterest-

bearing balances, securities, loans, and other

assets as well as liabilities tied to VIEs that

are reflected in the amounts reported in the

corresponding asset and liability categories

on the parent institution’s consolidated

balance sheet. While securitization activities

present many risks, the data on VIEs are

particularly useful for monitoring and

examining credit risk or the risk to earnings

performance from the VIEs’ activities.

Depending on the volume of an institution’s

VIEs, VIE assets that can be used only to

settle obligations of the consolidated VIEs

can also impact off-site assessments of the

parent institution’s liquidity position given

the restrictions on the use of the VIEs’ assets

for borrowing purposes. Thus, the analysis of

amounts reported in Schedule RC–V assists

with planning the proper scoping and

staffing of examinations of institutions with

activities conducted through VIEs.

Appendix B

FFIEC 051: To Be Completed by Banks With

Domestic Offices Only and Total Assets Less

Than $1 Billion

Data Items Removed, Other Impacts to Data

Items, or New or Increased Reporting

Threshold

Data Items Removed

SCHEDULE RC–A, CASH AND BALANCES DUE FROM DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, REMOVED

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–B ..............

4.a.(1) ............

Residential mortgage pass-through securities: Guaranteed by GNMA (Col-

umns A through D).

RCONG300, RCONG301,

RCONG302, RCONG303.

RC–B ..............

4.a.(2) ...........

Data

Items, or New or Increased Reporting

Threshold

Data Items Removed

SCHEDULE RC–A, CASH AND BALANCES DUE FROM DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS, REMOVED

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–B ..............

4.a.(1) ............

Residential mortgage pass-through securities: Guaranteed by GNMA (Col-

umns A through D).

RCONG300, RCONG301,

RCONG302, RCONG303.

RC–B ..............

4.a.(2) ............

Residential mortgage pass-through securities: Issued by FNMA and FHLMC

(Columns A through D).

RCONG304, RCONG305,

RCONG306, RCONG307.

Note: Items 4.a.(1) and 4.a.(2) of Schedule RC–B will be combined into one

data item (new item 4.a).

RC–F ..............

3.a ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on mortgage

loans.

RCONA519.

RC–F ..............

3.b ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on other financial

assets.

RCONA520.

Note: Items 3.a and 3.b of Schedule RC–F will be combined into one data

item (new item 3).

RC–F ..............

6.d ..................

Retained interests in accrued interest receivable related to securitized credit

cards.

RCONC436.

SU ..................

8.e ..................

Outstanding credit card fees and finance charges included in retail credit

card receivables sold and securitized with servicing retained or with re-

course or other seller-provided credit enhancements.

RCONC407.

Other Impacts to Data Items

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00121

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

.

Outstanding credit card fees and finance charges included in retail credit

card receivables sold and securitized with servicing retained or with re-

course or other seller-provided credit enhancements.

RCONC407.

Other Impacts to Data Items

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00121

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51922

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–B ..............

4.a.(1) (New) ..

Residential mortgage pass-through securities: Issued or guaranteed by

FNMA, FHLMC, or GNMA (Columns A through D).

To be determined (TBD)—4

MDRM Numbers.

Note: Items 4.a.(1) and 4.a.(2) of Schedule RC–B will be combined into this

data item.

RC–F ..............

3 (New) ..........

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) ............................

TBD.

Note: Items 3.a and 3.b of Schedule RC–F removed above will be combined

into this data item.

Data Items With a New or Increased

Reporting Threshold

Schedule RC–T: Increase the threshold for

the exemption from reporting Schedule RC–

T items 14 through 26 institutions with

fiduciary assets of $100 million or less to

institutions with fiduciary assets of $250

million or less (that do not meet the fiduciary

income test for quarterly reporting).

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–T ..............

14 ...................

Income from personal trust and agency accounts .............................................

RIADB904.

RC–T ..............

15.a ................

Income from employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency ac-

counts: Employee benefit—defined contribution.

RIADB905.

RC–T ..............

15.b ................

Income from employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency ac-

counts: Employee benefit—defined benefit.

RIADB906.

RC–T ..............

15.c ...............

.......

RIADB904.

RC–T ..............

15.a ................

Income from employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency ac-

counts: Employee benefit—defined contribution.

RIADB905.

RC–T ..............

15.b ................

Income from employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency ac-

counts: Employee benefit—defined benefit.

RIADB906.

RC–T ..............

15.c ................

Income from employee benefit and retirement-related trust and agency ac-

counts: Other employee benefit and retirement-related accounts.

RIADB907.

RC–T ..............

16 ...................

Income from corporate trust and agency accounts ...........................................

RIADA479.

RC–T ..............

17 ...................

Income from investment management and investment advisory agency ac-

counts.

RIADJ315.

RC–T ..............

18 ...................

Income from foundation and endowment trust and agency accounts ...............

RIADJ316.

RC–T ..............

19 ...................

Income from other fiduciary accounts ................................................................

RIADA480.

RC–T ..............

20 ...................

Income from custody and safekeeping accounts ..............................................

RIADB909.

RC–T ..............

21 ...................

Other fiduciary and related services income .....................................................

RIADB910.

RC–T ..............

22 ...................

Total gross fiduciary and related services income ............................................

RIAD4070.

RC–T ..............

23 ...................

Less: Expenses ..................................................................................................

RIADC058.

RC–T ..............

24 ...................

Less: Net losses from fiduciary and related services ........................................

RIADA488.

RC–T ..............

25 ...................

Plus: Intracompany income credits for fiduciary and related services ..............

RIADB911.

RC–T .............

....................................................................................

RIADC058.

RC–T ..............

24 ...................

Less: Net losses from fiduciary and related services ........................................

RIADA488.

RC–T ..............

25 ...................

Plus: Intracompany income credits for fiduciary and related services ..............

RIADB911.

RC–T ..............

26 ...................

Net fiduciary and related services income .........................................................

RIADA491.

To be completed by banks with collective

investment funds and common trust funds

with a total market value of $1 billion or

more as of the preceding December 31.

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–T ..............

M3.a ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Domestic equity (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB931, RCONB932.

RC–T ..............

M3.b ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: International/Global eq-

uity (Columns A and B).

RCONB933, RCONB934.

RC–T ..............

M3.c ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Stock/Bond blend (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB935, RCONB936.

RC–T ..............

M3.d ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Taxable bond (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB937, RCONB938.

RC–T ..............

M3.e ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Municipal bond (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB939, RCONB940.

RC–T ..............

M3.f ................

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Short-term investments/

Money market (Columns A and B).

RCONB941, RCONB942.

RC–T ..............

M3.g ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Specialty/Other (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB943, RCONB944

nd common trust funds: Municipal bond (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB939, RCONB940.

RC–T ..............

M3.f ................

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Short-term investments/

Money market (Columns A and B).

RCONB941, RCONB942.

RC–T ..............

M3.g ...............

Collective investment funds and common trust funds: Specialty/Other (Col-

umns A and B).

RCONB943, RCONB944.

Appendix C

FFIEC 041: To Be Completed by Banks With

Domestic Offices Only and Consolidated

Total Assets Less Than $100 Billion, Except

Those Banks That File the FFIEC 051

Data Items Removed, Other Impacts to Data

Items, or New or Increased Reporting

Threshold

Data Items Removed

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00122

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51923

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–A ..............

2.a ..................

Balances due from U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks ...................

RCON0083.

RC–A ..............

2.b ..................

Balances due from other commercial banks in the U.S. and other depository

institutions in the U.S.

RCON0085.

Note: Items 2.a and 2.b of Schedule RC–A will be combined into one data

item (new item 2).

RC–A ..............

3.a ..................

Balances due from foreign branches of other U.S. banks ................................

RCON0073.

RC–A ..............

3.b ..................

Balances due from other banks in foreign countries and foreign central banks

RCON0074.

Note: Items 3.a and 3.b of Schedule RC–A will be combined into one data

item (new item 3).

RC–F ..............

3.a ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on mortgage

loans.

RCONA519.

RC–F ..............

3.b ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on other financial

assets.

RCONA520

central banks

RCON0074.

Note: Items 3.a and 3.b of Schedule RC–A will be combined into one data

item (new item 3).

RC–F ..............

3.a ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on mortgage

loans.

RCONA519.

RC–F ..............

3.b ..................

Interest-only strips receivable (not in the form of a security) on other financial

assets.

RCONA520.

Note: Items 3.a and 3.b of Schedule RC–F will be combined into one data

item (new item 3).

RC–F ..............

6.d ..................

Retained interests in accrued interest receivable related to securitized credit

cards.

RCONC436.

RC–N .............

M5.b.(1) .........

Loans measured at fair value: Fair value (Columns A through C) ....................

RCONF664, RCONF665,

RCONF666.

RC–N .............

M5.b.(2) .........

Loans measured at fair value: Unpaid principal balance (Columns A through

C).

RCONF667, RCONF668,

RCONF669.

RC–P ..............

1.a ..................

Retail originations during the quarter of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

for sale: Closed-end first liens.

RCONF066.

RC–P ..............

1.b ..................

Retail originations during the quarter of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

for sale: Closed-end junior liens.

RCONF067.

RC–P ..............

1.c.(1) .............

Retail originations during the quarter of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

for sale: Open-end loans extended under lines of credit: Total commitment

under the lines of credit.

RCONF670.

Note: Items 1.a, 1.b, and 1.c.(1) of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one

data item (new item 1).

RC–P ..............

1.c.(2) .............

Retail originations during the quarter of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

for sale: Open-end loans extended under lines of credit: Principal amount

funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF671.

RC–P ..............

2.a ..................

Wholesale originations and purchases during the quarter of 1–4 family resi-

dential mortgage loans for sale: Closed-end first liens.

RCONF068

.............

Retail originations during the quarter of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

for sale: Open-end loans extended under lines of credit: Principal amount

funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF671.

RC–P ..............

2.a ..................

Wholesale originations and purchases during the quarter of 1–4 family resi-

dential mortgage loans for sale: Closed-end first liens.

RCONF068.

RC–P ..............

2.b ..................

Wholesale originations and purchases during the quarter of 1–4 family resi-

dential mortgage loans for sale: Closed-end junior liens.

RCONF069.

RC–P ..............

2.c.(1) .............

Wholesale originations and purchases during the quarter of 1–4 family resi-

dential mortgage loans for sale: Open-end loans extended under lines of

credit: Total commitment under the lines of credit.

RCONF672.

Note: Items 2.a, 2.b, and 2.c.(1) of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one

data item (new item 2).

RC–P ..............

2.c.(2) .............

Wholesale originations and purchases during the quarter of 1–4 family resi-

dential mortgage loans for sale: Open-end loans extended under lines of

credit: Principal amount funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF673.

RC–P ..............

3.a ..................

1–4 family residential mortgage loans sold during the quarter: Closed-end

first liens.

RCONF070.

RC–P ..............

3.b ..................

1–4 family residential mortgage loans sold during the quarter: Closed-end

junior liens.

RCONF071.

RC–P ..............

3.c.(1) .............

1–4 family residential mortgage loans sold during the quarter: Total commit-

ment under the lines of credit.

RCONF674.

Note: Items 3.a, 3.b, and 3.c.(1) of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one

data item (new item 3).

RC–P ..............

3.c.(2) .............

1–4 family residential mortgage loans sold during the quarter: Principal

amount funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF675.

RC–P ..............

4.a .................

loans sold during the quarter: Total commit-

ment under the lines of credit.

RCONF674.

Note: Items 3.a, 3.b, and 3.c.(1) of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one

data item (new item 3).

RC–P ..............

3.c.(2) .............

1–4 family residential mortgage loans sold during the quarter: Principal

amount funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF675.

RC–P ..............

4.a ..................

1–4 family residential mortgage loans held for sale or trading at quarter-end:

Closed-end first liens.

RCONF072.

RC–P ..............

4.b ..................

1–4 family residential mortgage loans held for sale or trading at quarter-end:

Closed-end junior liens.

RCONF073.

RC–P ..............

4.c.(1) .............

1–4 family residential mortgage loans held for sale or trading at quarter-end:

Total commitment under the lines of credit.

RCONF676.

Note: Items 4.a, 4.b, and 4.c.(1) of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one

data item (new item 4).

RC–P ..............

4.c.(2) .............

1–4 family residential mortgage loans held for sale or trading at quarter-end:

Principal amount funded under the lines of credit.

RCONF677.

RC–P ..............

5.a ..................

Noninterest income for the quarter from the sale, securitization, and servicing

of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans: Closed-end 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans.

RIADF184.

RC–P ..............

5.b ..................

Noninterest income for the quarter from the sale, securitization, and servicing

of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans: Open-end 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans extended under lines of credit.

RIADF560.

Note: Items 5.a and 5.b of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one data

item (new item 5).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00123

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

ion, and servicing

of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans: Open-end 1–4 family residential

mortgage loans extended under lines of credit.

RIADF560.

Note: Items 5.a and 5.b of Schedule RC–P will be combined into one data

item (new item 5).

VerDate Sep<11>2014

17:26 Nov 07, 2017

Jkt 244001

PO 00000

Frm 00123

Fmt 4703

Sfmt 4703

E:\FR\FM\08NON1.SGM

08NON1

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

51924

Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 215 / Wednesday, November 8, 2017 / Notices

Schedule

Item

Item name

MDRM No.

RC–P ..............

6.a ..................

Repurchases and indemnifications of 1–4 family residential mortgage loans

during the quarter: Closed-end first liens.

RCONF678.

RC–P ..............

6.b .......

This text is long and has been trimmed here. Open the source document for the complete record.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.

Proposed Revisions to the Consolidated Reports of Condition and Income (Call Report) for June 2018 · FDIC FIL-58-2017 | Frix