Modifications to the Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
FederalAgency guidance
Ask Donna
How this section applies to your facts.
FDIC Financial Institution Letters › Modifications to the Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act
Text
Financial Institution Letter
FIL-3-2013
February 8, 2013
MODIFICATIONS TO THE STATEMENT OF POLICY FOR
SECTION 19 OF THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE ACT
Summary: Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDI) Act prohibits, without the prior written consent
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), a person convicted of a criminal offense involving
dishonesty, breach of trust, money laundering, or who has entered into a pretrial diversion program, from
participating in the affairs of an FDIC-insured institution. On December 11, 2012, the FDIC Board of Directors
modified the de minimis exceptions regarding the potential fine and the number of days of imprisonment.
Modifications of the criteria are expected to reduce the number of Section 19 applications and regulatory
burden. The updated Statement of Policy (SOP) for Section 19 of the FDI Act is available on the FDIC’s Web
site and was published in the Federal Register on December 18, 2012. Further, the FDIC reminds the industry
to become familiar with the requirements of Section 19 of the FDI Act and the related SOP, and to ensure that
its personnel policies and procedures comply. All FDIC-insured institutions, bank holding companies, and
savings and loan holding companies must comply with the requirements of Section 19 of the FDI Act (12
U.S.C. 1829).
Statement of Applicability to Institutions Under $1 Billion in Total Assets: This guidance applies to all
FDIC-insured depository institutions.
Distribution:
FDIC-Insured Institutions
Highlights:
The SOP de minimis exceptions under which the FDIC will
grant an automatic approval under Section 19 have been
modified to reflect the following: “[t]he offense was punishable
by imprisonment for a term of one year or less and/or a fine of
$2,500 or less, and the individual did not serve more than
three (3) days of actual jail time.”
Industry applications for employment, background check
programs, and hiring practices must comply with Section 19
t an automatic approval under Section 19 have been
modified to reflect the following: “[t]he offense was punishable
by imprisonment for a term of one year or less and/or a fine of
$2,500 or less, and the individual did not serve more than
three (3) days of actual jail time.”
Industry applications for employment, background check
programs, and hiring practices must comply with Section 19.
Offenses covered by Section 19 have no statute of limitations.
Therefore, institutions must consider a job applicant’s entire
legal history.
In matters related to Section 19, federal law pre-empts
applicable state law(s).
Individuals with convictions subject to Section 19 may apply
to the FDIC for permission to participate in the affairs of an
FDIC- insured institution and to the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System for permission to participate in the
affairs of a bank holding company or a savings and loan
holding company.
An individual cannot be affiliated with, or employed by, an
insured institution while a Section 19 application is pending
with the FDIC.
Suggested Routing:
Chief Executive Officer
Legal Counsel
Human Resources Department
Compliance Officer
Related Guidance:
Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the FDI Act:
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-
1300.html#fdic5000applicationsus
Attachment:
Modification to the Statement of Policy for Section
19 of the FDI Act
Application:
The Section 19 application form is available at
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/FORMS/section
19.html.
Contact:
For questions related to the SOP, please contact
Larisa Collado, Section Chief, at
ct:
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/rules/5000-
1300.html#fdic5000applicationsus
Attachment:
Modification to the Statement of Policy for Section
19 of the FDI Act
Application:
The Section 19 application form is available at
http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/laws/FORMS/section
19.html.
Contact:
For questions related to the SOP, please contact
Larisa Collado, Section Chief, at
(202) 898-8509 or lcollado@fdic.gov; or
Martin Thompson, Senior Review Examiner, at (202)
898-6767 or marthompson@fdic.gov.
Note:
FDIC Financial Institution Letters (FILs) may be
accessed from the FDIC's Web site at
www.fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2013/index.html.
To receive FILs electronically, please visit
http://www.fdic.gov/about/subscriptions/fil.html.
Paper copies may be obtained through the FDIC's
Public Information Center, 3501 Fairfax Drive, E-
1002, Arlington, Virginia 22226.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
550 17th Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20429-9990
Modifications to the Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the Federal
Deposit Insurance Act
Section 19 of the Federal Deposit Insurance (FDI) Act (12 U.S.C. 1829) prohibits,
without the prior written consent of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), a person convicted of certain criminal offenses (covered offenses), or
who has agreed to a pretrial diversion or similar program in connection with a
prosecution for such offense, from participating in the affairs of an FDIC-insured
institution (insured institution), a bank holding company, or a savings and loan
holding company. In matters related to Section 19, federal law pre-empts
applicable state law(s). The FDIC has jurisdiction over Section 19 matters for
insured institutions, while the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has jurisdiction over Section 19 matters for bank holding companies and savings
and loan holding companies
ution), a bank holding company, or a savings and loan
holding company. In matters related to Section 19, federal law pre-empts
applicable state law(s). The FDIC has jurisdiction over Section 19 matters for
insured institutions, while the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
has jurisdiction over Section 19 matters for bank holding companies and savings
and loan holding companies.
Since it was enacted in 1950, Section 19 has been revised primarily to consider
money laundering and other statutory regulatory changes such as the Financial
Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 and the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. In implementing Section 19,
the FDIC is guided by the Statement of Policy for Section 19 of the FDI Act
(SOP), and de minimis factors discussed therein to determine the need for a
Section 19 application.
An individual subject to Section 19 cannot be affiliated with, or employed by, an
insured institution while a Section 19 application is pending. Two methods are
available for obtaining regulatory approval for Section 19 applications: an
institution can sponsor the application or an individual can seek a waiver of the
sponsorship requirements. The FDIC must consider an individual's lifetime legal
record and rehabilitation when processing a Section 19 application.
Historically, the FDIC has received a number of applications for Section 19
individual waivers for minor infractions that did not meet the de minimis factors
regarding the maximum potential fine or the jail time served. Experience has
shown that, under most state potential sentencing guidelines, fines for minor
infractions can be up to $2,500. Additionally, there have been numerous cases
where minimal actual jail time was included as part of the sentence; however,
such minimal jail time has not been a significant factor in the FDIC’s
consideration of the Section 19 application
fine or the jail time served. Experience has
shown that, under most state potential sentencing guidelines, fines for minor
infractions can be up to $2,500. Additionally, there have been numerous cases
where minimal actual jail time was included as part of the sentence; however,
such minimal jail time has not been a significant factor in the FDIC’s
consideration of the Section 19 application. Adjusting the de minimis exceptions
to increase the potential fine to $2,500 and allow a limited number days of actual
jail time served for minor infractions appears just and reasonable.
Therefore, the FDIC Board of Directors has modified the de minimis language of
the SOP regarding the potential fine and imprisonment to reflect the following:
“The offense was punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or
less and/or a fine of $2,500 or less, and the individual did not serve more
than three (3) days of actual jail time.”
Insured institutions should become familiar with the SOP and refer to it when
reviewing the applicability of Section 19 to current and potential institution-
affiliated parties (IAP). An IAP includes, but is not limited to employees, board
members, and consultants. An individual with a covered offense or program
entry cannot participate in the affairs of an insured institution without prior
regulatory approval.
Industry applications for employment, background check programs, and hiring
practices must comply with Section 19. Offenses covered by Section 19 have no
statute of limitations. Therefore, institutions must consider a job applicant’s entire
legal history. Further, the industry should ensure that its employment due
diligence, including Section 19 compliance, is completed prior to an employee’s
start date.
Insured institutions that knowingly employ an individual with a covered offense or
program entry contrary to Section 19 can be subject to criminal penalties
ns. Therefore, institutions must consider a job applicant’s entire
legal history. Further, the industry should ensure that its employment due
diligence, including Section 19 compliance, is completed prior to an employee’s
start date.
Insured institutions that knowingly employ an individual with a covered offense or
program entry contrary to Section 19 can be subject to criminal penalties.
Whoever knowingly violates Section 19 can be fined not more than $1,000,000
for each day such prohibition is violated or imprisoned for not more than five (5)
years, or both.
This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.