Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp. v. Commissioner (No. 928)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1960

A. 2, 1957), 248 Fed. 2d 399, 402; 1. S. v. South Georgia Railroad Company (C. A. 5, 1939), 107 Fed, 2d 3, at page 5; Washmont Corporation v. Hendrick: ‘sen (C. … eral to file the government’s petition for certiorari to and itticluding March 24, 1961; however, this petitioner had .no knowledge of this. action until receipt of a letter of January 24, 1961, from

Opposition Brief — Seldrick Carpenter, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 9, 2024

United States, No. 24-5679 (filed Sept. 27, 2024); Stradford v. United States, No. 24-5943 (filed Nov. 6, 2024); Reyes v. … Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970). “In other words, the two provisions mean substantially the same thing.” Patton, 281 U.S. at 298; see United States v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Schools, Health & Libraries Broadband Coalition, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 11, 2024

Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940). … Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940)).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — M/V Litsa v. Southeastern Maritime Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989

Welles, 289 F.2d 188 (5th Cir. 1961) 22, Page 15, 26, 18, 23 33: 20 27 17 33 33 25 25 24 vi Table of Authorities CASES The NIKITA, 62 F. 936 (5th Cir. 1894) OWYHEE, 66 F.2d 399 (2d … Since 24 that time, the United States Courts, as set forth above, have enunciated a stan- dard of extraordinary or high degree of diligence.

Jurisdictional Statement — Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Rosener

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981

Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966). … Penn- sylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402 (1966).

Respondents Brief — Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Pottorff

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1934

Achoreans, 24 L. R. … S. 399; 57 L.

Respondents Brief — Moore v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1972

Moore, 35 TH. 2d 399, 406, 220 N.E. 2d ! 443 (1966), cert. hanes 389 U.S. 861. ie 7 7. … ridge, 70 @al. 2d 824, 452° P. 2d 637 ( 1969); People v. - Stanworth, 7] Cal. 24° 820, 457. P. 2d 889 (1969). Paren-.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McCarthy v. Supreme Court of California, (2006) (No. 724)

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006

State Bar (1935) 4 Cal.2d 399, 49 P.2d 837. “7. … State Bar (1935), 4 Cal.2d 399, 49 P2d 837. 7.

Opinion — McKeiver v. Pennsylvania

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1971

We noted probable jurisdiction. 399 U. S. 925 (1970). … Florida, 399 U. S. 78, 118-119 (1970). aaa SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 322 anp 128.

Brief for the Petitioner — Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Kepner

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1941

Ed. 399, 19S. Ct. 119, and Prout v. Starr, 188 U.S. 537, 47 L. Ed. 584, 23 S. … Ct. 79, 24 A. L.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Ching En Lee, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 8, 2021

Special Agent Scott 7 testified that in February 2014 and April 2014 he requested further documentation about 8 defendant’s queries and TECS history from Customs and Border Protection. 9 399:2-25 … Tr. 399:17-22. 4 Defendant states that the first time he learned of the allegation regarding the TECS print­ out was upon hearing Special Agent Scott’s testimony at trial. Mot. at 10.

Final Passenger Motor Vehicle Theft Data; Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard

Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Mar 16, 1994

Chevrolet Camaro.................................... 288 759 33,200 97,290 8.0236 24 Mitsubishi.................... … SIL Spirit/Spur/Mulsa/Eight......................... 0 0 399 505 0.0000 223 Nissan.......................

Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous

Agency decision · Agency decision

For taxable years beginning in 2005, the value used in § 24(d)(1)(B)(i) in determining the amount of credit under § 24 that may be refundable is $11,000. .05 Hope and Lifetime Learning Credits. (1) For … of Household) $31,030 $35,263 $11,750 Threshold Phaseout Amount (Married Filing Jointly) $16,370 $16,370 $ 8,530 Completed Phaseout Amount (Married Filing Jointly) $33,030 $37,263 $13,750 399

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Barden v. Junior College District No. 520

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972

Strassheim, Sheriff, 242 Tl. 399, 366; 90 N.E. 118. See Hyslop v. … JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT NO. 520 - [271 NE. 24 680] Scorr, Justice.

Opposition — Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. Rowley

Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1982

United States, 187 U.S. 118, 23 S.Ct. 42, 47 L.Ed. 100 (1902) 24 Chernack v. Radlo, 331 F.2d 170 (First Circuit, 1964) 6 =e v. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399-403, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 534-535, 45 S.Ct. 571, 69 L.Ed. 1070 (1925); Olmstead v.

Record and brief — Michigan v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1981

(Tr. 2120-24.) … LeBlanc, 399 Mich. “3 308 WLW 1 N.W. 99 (1976) . . . . passim Puvallup Tribe v. Department of Game (Puyallup I), 391 U.S. 392 (1968). * . . . ° * . * . . s — 24 Seufert Brothers Co. v.

Petitioners Brief — Federal Communications Commission, et al., Petitioners v. Consumers' Research, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 8, 2025

Id. at 399. … Id. at 399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mario A. Manborde, Petitioner v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 4, 2024

Rosenbaum on 08/07/2024, USAP 11 No. 24-10843. … USCA11 Case: 24-10843 Document: 17-1 Date Filed: 08/07/2024 Page. 1 of 4 3n : aUntiEb States Clnnrf nf Appeals Inr ify 1kvcnth (Hxrrint No. 24-10843 MARIO A.

Motion to affirm — Linda H. Lamone, et al., Appellants v. O. John Benisek, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Motion to affirm · Dec 11, 2018

Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 461 (2006) (LULAC) (Stevens, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). The State has never expressly disagreed with these basic principles. … JS 19, 24.

Amicus Curiae Brief — O. John Benisek, et al., Appellants v. Linda H. Lamone, Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 29, 2018

No. 186-1, at 24, 37-38 (filed June 30, 2017) (D. Md.) … Mar. 24, 2017); Rucho, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5191, at *87-88; Benisek, 2017 U.S. Dist.