Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.34s
Amicus Curiae Brief — McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Edwards, 482 U.S. at 613 (Scalia, J., dissenting). See, e.g., Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639, 649 (2002); Witters v. … Edwards, 482 U.S. at 586-87; see also Wallace, 472 U.S. at 14 74 (O’Connor, J., concurring).
545 U.S. 844Petitioners Brief — United States v. John Doe, Inc. I
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1987
. at 482)—did apply here (Pet. … See Sells, 463 U.S. at 423-425; Illinois v. Abbott & Associates, Inc., 460 U.S. 557, 566-567 n.11, 572-573 (1983); Douglas Oil Co. v.
481 U.S. 102Federal Register · Notice · Sep 17, 2010
mbhardwaj@ntia.doc.gov or by phone at (202) 482-4985. … A workshop will be held to discuss industry and U.S. Government perspectives.
75 FR 56994Commerce DepartmentNational Telecommunications and Information AdministrationAmicus Curiae Brief — Zant v. Corn
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1988
City of Cleveland, 478 U.S. , 92 L.Ed.2d 405 (1986) ana Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, 476 U.S. ——, 90 L.Ed.2d 260 (1986). … The U.S.
486 U.S. 1023Petition — DeCrane v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983
Merrill, 332 U.S. 380, 68 S. Ct. 1, 92 L. Ed. 10 (1947) 7 Jackson v. United States, 573 F.2d 1189 (Ct. Cl. 1978) 7 Novak v. Rumsfeld, 423 F. Supp. 971 (U.S. D.C. N.D. … Supp. 1374 (U.S. D.C. Puerto Rico 1981); Novak v. Rumsfeld, 423 F. Supp. 971 (U.S. D.C, N.D. Cal. 1976); Peavy v. Warner, 493 F.2d 748 (5th Cir. 1974).
459 U.S. 1147Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 3, 2023
Ct. 423 (2021) ......................................... 2, 12 Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U.S. … U.S. Philips Corp., 510 U.S. 27, 30–33 (1993).
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 5, 2007
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov at (202) 482-0665 (Republic of Korea), Blanche Ziv at (202) 482-4207 or Hallie Zink at (202) 482-6907 (People's Republic of China), Victoria Cho at … (202) 482-5075 or Christopher Hargett at (202) 482-4161 (Germany), Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
72 FR 62430Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Sparing v. Village of Olympia Fields
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2002
United States, 451 U.S. 204 (1981) 0.0... 6 Tavery v. United States, 32 F.3d 1423 (10th Cir. 1994) .... 14 - Trejo v. Perez, 693 F.2d 482 (Sth Cir. 1982) ....... eee 10 United States v. … Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 417-24 (1976).
536 U.S. 958Conformed to Federal Register Version
Agency decision · Agency decision
See U.S. … This approach is also consistent with Rule 156(b)(4), which 423 See Item 7(e) of Form N-4. 424 See Rule 482(j); proposed Rule 482(k)(3)(ii). 425 See Item 4 of Form N-4.
Securities and Exchange CommissionPetition — Pellitieri v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
New Hampshire, supra, 403 U.S. at 468-71. … Ill. 1974) (check), aff'd, 518 F.2d 646 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 995 (1975). In United States v. Anderson, 359 F. Supp. 61 (E.D.
439 U.S. 828Amicus Brief — Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1984
Williams, 423 U.S. 876 (1977) ou... 11 United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976) 15, 16 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES—Continued Pages United States v. Bosch, 584 F. 24 1113 (1st Cir. … Williams, 423 U.S. 876 (1977).
466 U.S. 668Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Raul Mejia, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 24, 2020
Kow, 58 F.3d 423, 426-28 (9th Cir. 1995). … Kow, 58 F.3d 423; Cassady v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Code 173-423-010 (2006). … Hoffman, 423 F. Supp. 450, 453 (D.
549 U.S. 497Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Timothy Alexander, Petitioner v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 18, 2025
State of Illinois, 372 U.S. 528(1963) 12 Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 81 S.Ct. 1684(1961) 3., Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96(1975) 8 Michigan v. … Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 103-04(1975).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 233 (1987). … McMahon, 482 U.S. at 226 (emphasis added).
525 U.S. 70Congressional research report · CRS Report · May 8, 2006
As a separate procedural matter, the U.S. … The U.S.
RL33410Congressional Research ServicePetition — Hayes v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979
U.S. v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87 (1975). While § 841 does forbid a specific act it provides no notice of any standard by which a pharmacist may adequately guard against. … U.S. v. Powell, 423 U.S. 87 (1975); U.S. v. Cohen Grocery, 255 U.S. 81 (1921).
444 U.S. 866Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Caruso v. Bazzetta (No. 08-1213)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Garland Independent School Dist 189 U.S. 782, 792-793 (1989) 13 Hewitt v. Hlelms, 482 U.S. 755, 760 (1987) 1 Sole v. Wyner, 551 U.S. 74: 127 S. … Garland, 489 U.S. at 792 (citing Hewrtt v. Helms, 482 ot lw U.S. 755, 760-61 (1987)).
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 13, 2009
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Thomas Schauer or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Department of Commerce, 14 th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0410 or (202) 482-1690.
74 FR 7218Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPolyester Staple Fiber From Taiwan: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 4, 2015
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Hansen at 202-482-3683 or Minoo Hatten at 202-482-1690, AD/CVD Operations Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Assessment The Department will instruct U.S.
80 FR 46245Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade Administration
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.