Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.42s
Petitioners Brief — United States v. Ramsey
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1977
Nazro, 107 U.S. 215 (1882) ............ 26 Ex parte Jackson, 96 U.S. 727 (1877) ........... 23,24,25 Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) ........... 27 United States v. … Mitchell, 170 U.S. App.
431 U.S. 606Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Official Committee of Tort v. Dow Corning Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1997
Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 oii ME Re 8 &n.J 9,12n2 Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 116 S. Ct. 494 ROE 5 Sol ed ee 9, 12 United States y. … Hermansdorfer, 423 U.S. 336 (1976), that identical language in 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) absolutely bars review -- by mandamus as well as on appeal -- of orders remanding cases on any of the grounds specified
522 U.S. 977Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
County of Los Angeles 482 U.S. 304 (1987) 1,6, 9, 15, 18-20 Florida Rock Indus., Inc. v. U.S. 791 F.2d 893 (Fed. Cir. 1986) 12, 17 - iii - Page Florida Rock Indus., Inc. v. U .S. 21 Cl. … California Coastal Commn., 483 U.S. 825 [1987]; Firs: English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 [1987]; MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v.
505 U.S. 1003IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Agency decision · Agency decision
Co., 423 U.S. 232 (1976) .................. 18 Gollust v. Mendell, 501 U.S. 115 (1991) ................................................................... 4 Gwozdzinsky v. … Co., 423 U.S. 232, 249-50 (1976) (Section 16(b) applies only to purchases made after a person becomes a ten percent beneficial owner).
Securities and Exchange CommissionProposed Information Collection; Comment Request; Comment Card for E-mail Taglines
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 2, 2008
Suzan.Winters@mail.doc.gov, Fax: (202) 482-2599. … Abstract The International Trade Administration's U.S.
73 FR 57322Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationCivil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee; Meeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 23, 2018
NW, Washington, DC 20230 (Phone: 202-482-1297; Fax: 202-482-5665; email: jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov ). … civil nuclear goods and services in accordance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations, including advice on how U.S. civil nuclear goods and services export policies, programs, and activities will affect
83 FR 8047Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationMeeting of the Civil Nuclear Trade Advisory Committee
Federal Register · Notice · May 3, 2019
(Phone: 202-482-0775; Fax: 202-482-5665; email: devin.horne@trade.gov ). … civil nuclear goods and services in accordance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations, including advice on how U.S. civil nuclear goods and services export policies, programs, and activities will affect
84 FR 19038Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationInternational Buyer Program: Application and Exhibitor Data
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 22, 2003
, Export Promotion Services, Room 2116, 14th & Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; Phone number: (202) 482-0146, and fax number: (202) 482-0115. … . exhibitors and the percentage of net exhibit space occupied by U.S. companies vis-a-vis non-U.S. exhibitors.
68 FR 60336Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Oct 11, 2016
FAX: 202-482-9237, Attn: Brandon Steele. … FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Steele at the U.S. Office of Government Ethics; telephone: 202-482-9209; TTY: 800-877-8339; FAX: 202-482-9237; Email: basteele@oge.gov .
81 FR 70113Government Ethics OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Jun 14, 2002
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelica Mendoza, John Drury or Abdelali Elouaradia at (202) 482-3019, (202) 482-0195 and (202) 482-1374, respectively; AD/CVD Enforcement, Office 8, Group III, Import … Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S.
67 FR 40911Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationEstablishment of an Import Limit for Certain Wool Products Produced or Manufactured in Hong Kong
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 24, 1995
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Novak, International Trade Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4212. … For information on embargoes and quota re-openings, call (202) 482-3715. For information on categories on which consultations have been requested, call (202) 482-3740.
60 FR 37880Committee for the Implementation of Textile AgreementsFederal Register · Notice · May 14, 2001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Craig Matney (Israel) or James Nunno (Russian Federation), Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. … Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1778 and (202) 482-0783, respectively.
66 FR 24324Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationOffice of Government Ethics Organization and Functions Regulation; Clarifying Amendment
Federal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 2003
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Horton, Attorney Advisor, Office of Government Ethics; telephone: 202-482-9300; TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf and Speech Impaired): 202-482-9293 … ; FAX: 202-482-9237.
68 FR 62213Government Ethics OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Aug 25, 1995
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Aldrich, International Trade Specialist, Office of Textiles and Apparel, U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-4212. … For information on embargoes and quota re-openings, call (202) 482-3715. For information on categories on which consultations have been requested, call (202) 482-3740.
60 FR 44316Committee for the Implementation of Textile AgreementsMotion to Dismiss or Affirm — Dunlap v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1983
Locke, 423 U.S. 48 (1975) ............ Thillens, Inc. v. Morey, 11 Ill. 2d 579, 144 N.E.2d 735 (1957), appeal dismissed, 355 U.S. 606 RE erry rey Py ere United States v. … Locke, 423 U.S. 48, 49-50 (1975), this Court stated: It is settled that the fair warning requirement em- bodied in the Due Process Clause prohibits the States from holding an individual ‘‘criminally
464 U.S. 802Reply Brief — Rhode Island v. Innis
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1980
Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) 2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) 1, 2, 3, 4, BeAr 5, 6, 7, 8 North Carolina v. Butler, _._ U.S. ____, 60 L. Ed. 2d 286 (1979) r 7 State v. Innis, _.. … Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 (1975). It is by default that the potentiality-for-compulsion rationale offers the Fifth Amend- ment link to Miranda.
446 U.S. 291Reply Brief — United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1988
United States, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 (1975) .------ In re Perlin, 589 F.2d 260 (7th Cir. 1978) ~------ In re Sealed Case, 827 F.2d 776 (D.C. … United States, 520 F.2d 372 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1033 (1975).
487 U.S. 72Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Xavier Jamaal Orange, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 8, 2022
Bah, 439 F.3d 423 (8th Cir. 2006) .............................................................. 9 United States v. Miller, 2022 WL 1920691 (D.C. Cir. … Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Pet. App. 6 (quoting 4 Molina-Martinez, 578 U.S. at 200).
Amicus Brief — Lewis v. BT Investment Managers, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980
Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. GIB (IDI) ccc ccescccccvccccncecccccccuscccces 12, 14 Lincoln National Life Ins. Co. v. … Cir.), cert. denied 423 U.S. 875 (1975) ; Commercial National Bank v. Board of Gov- ernors, 451 F. 2d 86, 89 (8th Cir. 1971); American Trust Co. vy.
447 U.S. 27Reply Briefmm — United Hospital Center v. Guida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Briefmm · 2002
Ohio, 360 U.S. 423 (1959) ............. 4 Secretary v. J.H. — Co., 467 U.S. 947 (BGG)... ....vesscenccsidcenesieeeubsaiainat aaa ae 6 Streich v. American Family Mut. Ins. … Ohio, 360 U.S. 423, 436-37 (1959). Because the federal claim was fairly presented and necessarily decided, this Court has jurisdiction to review the state court’s order. See id 2.
537 U.S. 1047
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.