Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc. (No. 736)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1960
Wiiltschek, 2 Cir., 1953, 209 F. 24°493 . . Al, 25 _ George v. Burdusis, 1949, 21 C. 2d 1353, 130 P. 2d 399. 15 Harris Mfg. Co. v. W ‘illiams, D.. C. Ark., 1957, F. … Burdusis, 1949, 21 Cal. 2d 153, 130 P. 2d 399, is to the same effect.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 12, 2019
Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006)................................ 34 League of Women Voters of Mich. v. Johnson, No. 2:17cv14148 (E.D. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 420 (2006). See also Gill, 138 S. Ct. at 1928. See also Schuck, The Thickest Thicket: Partisan Gerrymandering and Judicial Regulation of Politics, 87 COLUM. L.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 20, 2019
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .........................................................27 Gonzaga University v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273 (2002) ..............................................24 Hall v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986).” Id.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Jesus C. Hernández, et al., Petitioners v. Jesus Mesa, Jr.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 9, 2019
Robbins, 551 U.S. 537 (2007) ........................... 24, 25, 26 Wilson v. McKenzie, 7 Hill 95 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1845) .................... 22 Wise v. … Rev. 396, 399 (1987) (“The predominant method of suing officers in the early nineteenth century was an allegation of common law harm, particularly a physical trespass.
Opposition Brief — Bussell v. United States (No. 07-1262)
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008
Ss (8 o aN i j ad 73 . he . q owe” OF Faw - eee] No. 07-1262 399 GE OF Fine Oe + i LETANTIA BUSSELL, PETITIONER Vv. … Farias, 469 F.3d 393, 399 & n.17 (5th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1502 (2007); United States v. High Elk, 442 F.3d 622, 626 (8th Cir. 2006); United States v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 7, 2020
Ct. 1936 (2020) ............... 15,18, 24 v Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc., 516 U.S. 479 (1996) ............................................ .18 Nken v. … Warner Holding Co., 328 U.S. 395, 399 (1946), held that courts should interpret a statutory grant of injunctive power as carrying with it this traditional “adjunct,” unless Congress made a contrary intent
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2022
Medrano, 416 U.S. 802 (1974) ................................. 24 Americans for Prosperity Found. v. Bonta, 141 S. … The court identified no 24 authority for that interpretation of Section 1983.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 17, 2021
App. 20, 24, 34-35. … Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 396, 399 (2000); Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690 (1984).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2026
Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) ................. 6, 8, 11, 12, 13, 25 Christopher v. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 415 (2012).
Brief for the United States — United States v. Marion
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1971
119_-- 22. - 24 19 Stat. 32...---- 2. 24 68 Stat. 1145, 18 US.C. 3283 po eeeeteeee oe 24 IV Constitution, statutes and rule—Continued — The Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, ‘31 Charles, Oo Be see deme … Sisson, 399 U.S. 267 (1970) .....6.... ‘8 United States v. Sweet, 399 U.S. 517 (1970) .......... . 8 United States v. Thaiupson, 2)1 U.S. 407 (1920) ..... « 16 United States v.
404 U.S. 307Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 11, 2024
Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940). … Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 399 (1940)).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — M/V Litsa v. Southeastern Maritime Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1989
Welles, 289 F.2d 188 (5th Cir. 1961) 22, Page 15, 26, 18, 23 33: 20 27 17 33 33 25 25 24 vi Table of Authorities CASES The NIKITA, 62 F. 936 (5th Cir. 1894) OWYHEE, 66 F.2d 399 (2d … Since 24 that time, the United States Courts, as set forth above, have enunciated a stan- dard of extraordinary or high degree of diligence.
492 U.S. 939Jurisdictional Statement — Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Rosener
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1981
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966). … Penn- sylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402 (1966).
450 U.S. 1051Respondents Brief — Texas & Pacific R. Co. v. Pottorff
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1934
Achoreans, 24 L. R. … S. 399; 57 L.
291 U.S. 245Respondents Brief — Moore v. Illinois
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1972
Moore, 35 TH. 2d 399, 406, 220 N.E. 2d ! 443 (1966), cert. hanes 389 U.S. 861. ie 7 7. … ridge, 70 @al. 2d 824, 452° P. 2d 637 ( 1969); People v. - Stanworth, 7] Cal. 24° 820, 457. P. 2d 889 (1969). Paren-.
408 U.S. 786Petition for Writ of Certiorari — McCarthy v. Supreme Court of California, (2006) (No. 724)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2006
State Bar (1935) 4 Cal.2d 399, 49 P.2d 837. “7. … State Bar (1935), 4 Cal.2d 399, 49 P2d 837. 7.
Opinion — McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1971
We noted probable jurisdiction. 399 U. S. 925 (1970). … Florida, 399 U. S. 78, 118-119 (1970). aaa SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Nos. 322 anp 128.
403 U.S. 528Brief for the Petitioner — Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. Kepner
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Petitioner · 1941
Ed. 399, 19S. Ct. 119, and Prout v. Starr, 188 U.S. 537, 47 L. Ed. 584, 23 S. … Ct. 79, 24 A. L.
314 U.S. 44Appellees Brief — Dunn v. Blumstein
Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1972
Kolodziejski, 399. U.S. 204 (1970). … Pearce, 395 U.S. 711, 723-24 (1969).
405 U.S. 330Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alaska Airlines, Inc., Petitioner v. Judy Schurke, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 30, 2018
Id. at 62a; see infra at 24-25. … Livadas, 512 U.S. at 123–24, 114 S.Ct. 2068.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.