Documents

Oral argument — Inestroza-Tosta v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2023

reinstatement cases, the first and only time someone will be able to raise those claims of fear of persecution, torture, or even death will be after they've come back to the United States because the acts … What is your comment on that? So I believe that is a correct statement, but as Judge Ambrose has stated, the courts aren't really clear on this.

Oral argument — Leyse v. Bank of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

That's what motivated the telephone consumer protection act. No, I'm not trying to understand the question, the scope of it. No, the robocalls. I personally get them all the time. Okay. … Bank's comment that the plain text of the statute says that any person or entity can sue, any person can sue. The called party phrase appears as an affirmative defense.

Oral argument — 22-2207_Stadford v. Sec PA Dept Corrections

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 29, 2022

I suspect it's very comparable to non-sex offenders period. So it's really the SVPs that are experiencing the greatest delays here. I see I've got the red light. … And so I also would like to clarify the comment that we had successfully placed sex offenders.

Oral argument — Mayerv.Belichick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2010

The Commissioner makes it clear this was a wrongful act by his own comments and by the own internal discipline they impose on the Patriots and Coach Belichick. … So under the Consumer Fraud Act, I think the case ought to proceed to discovery to determine the sole question under the Consumer Fraud Act.

Oral argument — Benjamin v. DPW of PA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2012

And so we are here in a situation where an action was brought under the Americans with Disabilities Act by five individuals who wish, under the ADA, to be moved out of the state centers to another facility … Yeah, well, it would ultimately be less expensive, but one of the arguments that the department made in the district court in response or at summary judgment was that there is a transition period when,

Oral argument — Bracey v. Superintendent Rockview SC I

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2025

Well, it involves representation and we just wanted to bring to the attention of the court that at the conclusion of the argument without any comment on the merits of the case, we were proposing planning … Is that how does that affect the jury's assessment of whether or not he acted in self-defense?

Oral argument — Ctyof Gloucester v. Princeton Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

So you make that kind of comment. But you wait for the complaint. … There was this inaction period. I'm from the old school. If there's nothing to do, you don't make do something. So they notified them. They put a lawyer on retainer.

Oral argument — United States v. Flores-Mejia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 19, 2014

Well, it wasn't worth very much in terms of the government actually acting on it and bringing a Well, earning a 5K1 departure motion, it's still worth something in terms of the fact that the defendant … And the judge's entire response to that was a guideline sentence is appropriate and outside the guidelines would be inappropriate, period.

Oral argument — Quintez Talley v. Pushkalai Pillai

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2024

So I have two comments on that, Your Honor. First, the certificate of merit is something that is necessary to supplement a complaint if an individual wants to state a plausible malpractice claim. … Subject matter jurisdiction, that's determined by the Constitution and by acts of Congress.

Oral argument — Keating v. Pittston City

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2015

That's enough in that hypothetical to forego the parole officer from acting based on having taken the test? Or given the test, I should say? … Could you comment on the strip search, the basis for conducting it, and the standard and under the circumstances, was it reasonable? Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Chavez v. Dole Food Company Incetal_En Banc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2016

The plaintiffs ordinarily are allowed to choose a state with a longer limitations period. If it's not longer in your hypothetical, then you would be right. … I understand the limitations we have in our Act of Daimler in terms of what is sufficient contract with a firm to give rise to one's presence there.

Oral argument — &19-3203_USA v. Seighman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 28, 2020

I mean, I think that might tie into the substantial rights piece of the case, the judge's comments at the sentencing hearing. … And it is an important point that K is a much later addition to 3583, more than 20 years after the Sensing Reform Act, than G is. All right, let's move on to Parts 2 and 3.

Oral argument — Perez Jr. v. Borough Johnsonburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2023

Within the narrow scope of the time period that we're talking about, which is from the initial interactions through the time when he... Let's go to the next two. … Putting that aside, I think we get to the crux of the issue with that last comment from the district court's opinion here, and that is the district court's belief.

Oral argument — In Re Lipitor Antitrust Litigation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2025

They have to attest that they purchased Lipitor within the period, and then they have to provide the records that show that. … Okay, so I'll change my comment to general products to products that are subject to insurance plans.

Oral argument — United States v. Wahington

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2017

One is the Hobbs Act robbery, and the second is the drug distribution counts. He gets 20 years in the drug distribution counts. He gets two years in the Hobbs Act robbery. … Yes, maybe the evidence is overwhelming with respect to the Hobbs Act robbery.

Oral argument — Corecivic Inc v. Governor of New Jersey;Attorney General New Jersey

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2025

And then there have been the regulations, the CFRs that have been adopted, which expressly state that contracts can be entered into for a 15-year period. … It obviously would have to be put into more clean language, but the point is, it seems like there's total discretion at the DHS-ICE level, and the statute doesn't really fully answer what you must do other

Oral argument — Suarez v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2015

And don't you need to look at the person's record during that interim period of time? … In an as-applied challenge, the court is looking at a more narrow range, but the court is still evaluating- Maybe I just missed something from the comment we were having with Judge Hartman.

Oral argument — Johnson v. City of Philadelphia

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2020

An act of commission would be an affirmative act. An act of omission, it appears from our cases, would not be deemed an affirmative act. … And if I could just make a couple of comments on that, on some things Mr. Valari said along those lines.

Oral argument — In Re Boy Scouts of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2024

The other point I would make is there was a comment about, well, only abuse claims are in the trust. But that's not true either. … There was a comment about adequate protection.

Oral argument — United States v. Apple Macpro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2019

Because the statutory phrase, no period of confinement shall exceed the life of the court proceeding, has no meaning. … That's a limitation on that language in the All Writs Act. Well, Section 1826 plainly is a lot more closer, narrower statute in that regard than the All Writs Act.