Documents

Oral argument — Precision Pine & Timber v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2009

And Section 205 of the restatement, which this court cites in Sentex and has cited in other decisions, describes, it says in one of the comments to that section, the complete catalog of types of bad faith … The second is that the 135-day consultation period is not required or a correct ruling given that the findings will judge damage in the trial report that the breach occurred within 60 days.

Oral argument — Mars v. Coin Acceptors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2006

The patentee can act as its own lexicographer. That is exactly what happened here when the patentee chose to define the term higher frequency. … Marshall, you're well into your rebuttal period, but we chewed up the clock at the beginning of your argument. And we'll restore your rebuttal time.

Oral argument — JBLU, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

I mean, I understand that marks, you know, under the Lanham Act can apply to both registered and unregistered, claimed or unclaimed. … Under the Lanham Act, yes. And in every dictionary.

Oral argument — Bright Data Ltd. v. Code200, UAB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

They act as a client and they act as a server. Those were only server hardware. Client devices never did both of those things. … I'm having trouble understanding the analogy, period.

Oral argument — Mitchell v. McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016

It identifies the issue as the veteran contends the eligibility for VA benefits should be based upon his honorable period of service to a service-related injury. That was not the issue. … All that the veteran's law judge was to acknowledge that apparently he interpreted from the comments made by the representative that he was introducing a new issue of insanity.

Oral argument — Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2025

Do you want to just any comment on the counting away formulation? Yes. … It was approved by the 505B2 pathway in the Hatch-Waxman Act. So it's not that the world is precluded from using this drug for many years.

Oral argument — Healthport Corp v. Tanita Corp

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2009

The website was in use for a limited period of time. The records establish by Dr. … Before you move to the Lanham Act, though, can I ask you, so the district court actually says when granting summary judgment, the magistrate, I should say, because the district court did this without comment

Oral argument — Bengis v. Moss

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2009

It's the date of the bad act that starts the statute of money. Your Honor, it's not a question of discovery. … We'll let you have the final comments. Let's preserve and we'll hear from Mr. Gibbs. Good morning, Your Honor. Good morning.

Oral argument — US Synthetic Corp. v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2024

Like, for example, a composition of matter that cures dementia, period. Would that claim be directed to an abstract idea? … Well, I think the section one-on-one inquiry addresses problems that are not addressed by other provisions in the Patent Act. And those concerns go to preemption.

Oral argument — Univ S Carolina v. Univ So Cal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2009

And in fact, for off and on periods of time, for the last hundred years, this record is devoid of a single instance of actual confusion. … First, Your Honor, they have not – I want to comment on the record because the record does not actually reflect that fact.

Oral argument — In Re Aqua Products, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2016

The institution phase is not the period of the proceeding in which the motion to amend comes in. But it does come in during the course of the IPR. … With respect to—there was a comment that—several comments that this is good for patent owners.

Oral argument — National Institute v. Ford Motor

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

includes The right to enforce So NISTAC is asking this court In the context of a litigation Induced rewrite To expressly redefine the term That has already been defined In the contract It strikes me You can comment … are covered By for instance A release You have By negative Implication Omitted Any causes of action You don't express The state That's why you Take an all Stop there Any and all Claims Can't be brought Period

Oral argument — R.K. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2019

You just made a comment, and I'm just interested, so I don't want to put you on the spot, but you said the rare... You discussed the rarity of the Supreme Court asking for a response. … Because petitioners were not awarded compensation in this Vaccine Act case. They were not entitled to attorney's fees and costs as a matter of right.

Oral argument — FastShip, LLC v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2018

I certainly don't see anything wrong with that, but what we have here is a patent expiration date case, and we ought to be giving the full force and effect of the patent extent period for that. … So you have the 1910 Act, which did not include the word manufacture. And then there was the William Cramp case, which basically held this is a strict waiver of sovereign immunity.

Oral argument — Carter v. OPM

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2006

When the court, the court said the attorney signed, I was talking about the pre-hearing comments. Okay, well just tell me what you think Mr. Carter needs that he has not received. At this point Mr. … On what basis do you say his attorney didn't have authority to act on it? I mean, he signed the designation of record. And the designation of record specifically requested hearing.

Oral argument — ROMALA STONE v. HOME DEPOT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2010

And these bad acts, as alleged, give life to the unfair competition claim as well. So the three claims that are before the Court, the three issues, are really inextricably intertwined. … What's your comment to that?

Oral argument — Hewlett-Packard v. Acceleron

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2009

But what I'd like to hear your comments on is the extent, we know that MedImmune changed the rules. … Obviously, the holding of metamine is licensees automatically have standing, period. For everybody who isn't a licensee, what's the new test?

Oral argument — BOUCHARD v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2012

What I'm trying to say to you, and I want to say it, is that I think the board's current practice of picking up all these cases and making a few comments, not modifying in the way we know modify to mean … He could have said, well, he could have presented a correlation between the staff-patient ratio and favorable and unfavorable outcomes over a period of time.

Oral argument — Branson v. McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

Well, I really couldn't comment on that, Your Honor. I did not prepare that case. … So it's a seven-year period of time between 1982 and 1989 at 50% rating for PTSD. And just to briefly address two other issues that came up, to the extent Mr.

Oral argument — Russell v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

Occupational and social impairment with an occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks. … It's the comments of the denial of the petition review, and basically says there's no evidence, and it's pre-separation med records that documents either symptoms or diagnosis of PTSD.