Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.33s
Opposition — J. B. K., Inc. v. Caron
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Ct. 1975) 344 A.2d 260, aff’d., 373 A.2d 205 (Del.Sup.Ct. 1977) ............02. 15, 22, 24 Brown v. Brannon (M.D. N.C, 1975) 399 F. … Supp. 399 ....15, 22, 26, 28 Caesar’s Health Club v, St, Louis County (Mo.
444 U.S. 1016Petition — California v. Dalton
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Ma- roney, 399 U.S. 42, 47-49 (1970) ; Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 153 (1925). … Maroney (1970) 399 U.S. 42, 48-49. This argument misses the point.
445 U.S. 946Reply Brief — Wes Allen, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Appellants v. Bobby Singleton, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 4, 2025
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 434 (2006); see also De Grandy, 512 U.S. at 1030 (Kennedy, J., concurring); Shaw, 509 U.S. at 657. … Callais, No. 24-109 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2025). A. Race-based redistricting lacks an exact connection between means and ends.
Reply Brief — Wyoming, Petitioner v. Phillip Sam
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 19, 2018
State, 399 P.3d 625 (Wyo. 2017) ..............7 Henry v. State, 175 So. 3d 675 (Fla. 2015) ...................5 Ira v. Janecka, No. S-1-SC-35657, 2018 N.M. LEXIS 24 (N.M. … LEXIS 24, at *2 (N.M. Mar. 9, 2018) (sexual penetration, intimidation of a witness); Willbanks v.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Robertson v. Sanyo Maru
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1970
“J +. one; it was negligently executed. s . . : an nee ee 24 ears gence of the plaintiff and another ‘winch operator in failing properly to.correlate the operation of the two winches. … US. , 24 L.Ed. 2d 531 11970), decided subsequent to the trial below is adverse to appellant on this jemi, The court found thai the two winch operators failed to coordinate their efforts but that they
400 U.S. 854Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Monte Barry, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 26, 2025
Id. at 24. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970).
Jurisdictional Statement — Robinson v. Georgia
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1978
In Miller, the Supreme Court noted that “state statutes designed to regulate obscene material must be carefully limited.” 413 U.S. 15, at 23-24. … Slate, 24 Ga. 586, 487, 216 S.4.2d 838 (1975); Baliew v. State, 138 GaApp. S880, 53K6), 227 SA (1976). This cnumeration is without merit.
435 U.S. 991Reply Brief — James Erin McKinney, Petitioner v. Arizona
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 25, 2019
Br. 21-24. The Court need not address that question. … Br. 24 n.7.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lynch v. Alworth-Stephens Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1925
Lynch as Collector of Internal Revenue for the District of Minnesota to recover back the sum of $21,045.91, Federal income and excess-profits taxes paid for the 82583—24 “yy 2 year 1917, assessed … Howbert, 231 U. 5. 399; Stanton v. Baltic Mining Company, 240 U. S$. 103; Von Baumbach v. Sargent Land Company, 242 U.S. 503; United States v.
267 U.S. 364Opposition Brief — Rivera v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1989
JURISDICTION The judgment of the court of appeals was entered on October 24, 1988. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 161-162, 165, 167 n.16 (1970).
490 U.S. 1020Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1972
Maroney, 308 F. 24 806 (CA3 1968): DeToro. _ ¥o Peperenck, 882: F: 2d 341: (CA4 1984); Walker v: Wainwright, — 400 F; 2d 1812 (CAS 1960); Woddy v: Heer, 383 F. 2d 789 (CAG _ “3967); ' Butler -v. … Indeed, in Coleman we — remanded. for a determination of whether the failure to ‘appoint counsel had been harmless error. 399°U. 8., at 11.
405 U.S. 278Respondents Brief in Opposition — Plum v. Tampax, Inc. (No. 177)
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief in Opposition · 1961
-—< a. ed LIBRARY i JUL 24 196] OT. 1, Se a Tats Seok COU. AMES ® PRIWNING. Clerk IN THE Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 1961. No. 177. DAGNY PLUM, Petitioner, Vv. … Tampax, Inc., 399 Pa. 553, 562-63, 160 A. 2d 549, 554 (1960).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher Alan Mitchell, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 3, 2022
Ct. 399, 404 (2018) (Stitt II); Pet. App. at 3. However, Mr. … Ct. 399 (2018) (“Stitt II”).
Petition — Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Scott
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982
No. 96-839, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. (1980) .. 24, 25 H. Rpt. No. 96-583, 96th Cong., Ist Sess. (1979). 14-15, 23 H. Rpt. … E.g., New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392, 461 (1970) ; Palmer v. Massachusetts, 308 U.S. 79, 87- 88 (1939).
456 U.S. 998Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Mitchell v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1954
A. 8) 174 F. 2d 397, 399. In other words, no proof was made that the increases were income. … I. e. 399. In Leeby v. U.
347 U.S. 1012Petition for Writ of Certiorari — John Vaughn, Petitioner v. Nebraska
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 2, 2023
Kizzee, 877 F.3d 650 (5 Cir. 2017) ceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee 24 United States v. Maher, 454 F.3d 13 (1st Cir. 2006) cc eeeeeeeeeeeeeeees 24 United States v. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970)).
Respondents Brief — United States v. Navajo Nation
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2003
Br. at 24, is unfounded. … See 25 U.S.C. § 399, para. 1.
537 U.S. 488Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2020
United States, 282 U.S. 399 (1931) .................................................24 Joslin v. … Gerlach, 399 U.S. at 751-754.
Respondents Brief — At&t Corp. v. Iowa Utilities Board
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2002
JA 398-399, 400-401 (4] 705, 707). … JA 398- 399 (4705).
537 U.S. 807Petition for A Writ of Certiorari — United States v. Nobles
Supreme Court brief · Petition for A Writ of Certiorari · 1975
United States, 360 U.S. 343-.------------- 24 People v. Damon, 24 N.Y. 2d 256; 247 N.E. 2d 651, Oe OO, go oko on p+ --- ee eceee- 15, 17 People v. Sanders, 110 Ill. … -- 2-3, .12, 23, 24 18 U.S.C.
422 U.S. 225
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.