Documents

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Patti v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005

United States, 399 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2005) (sentence became final before this Court’s decision in Apprendi), Green v. … See, e.g., 24 United States v. Thomas, 274 F.3d 655 (2d Cir. 2001) (en banc).

Brief for Respondents in Opposition — NLRB v. Dant

Supreme Court brief · Brief for Respondents in Opposition · 1953

pany, 341 U.S. 399, 95 1@ ed. 969 has effectively settied the question sought to be raised by the Board's petition herein. _ Decisions of other Cirenit Courts of Appeal fully sa to this view. … Nina Dye Works, Inc., July 24, 1952, — F 24 —, 30 LRRM 2456. . In the Nina Dye case, the Court.of Appeals ea to enforce an NLRB order because the C, I.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Shelton v. Tennessee

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1972

State, 217 Tenn. 544, 399 S.W. 2d 507; Harris v. State, 217 Tenn. 582, 399 S.W. 2d 749; Brown v. State, Tenn. Crim. App., 441 S.W. 2d 485. … a 24 Q Now, did you and Mr. Munsey have any conver- sation concerning this car, but don’t tell what it was? A Yes, sir, we did. Q Asa result of the conversation you had with Mr.

Brief for the United States — United States v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1921

Opinion of District Court, R. 22 to 24; Circuit Court of Appeals, R. 26 to 31; 254 Fed. 266. ASSIGNMENT OF ERRORS. … United States, 240 U. 8. 399, 402. Nor is this a case where the United States sues for the benefit of « private party and is itself merely « formal party.

Opposition Brief — Kia P. v. City of New York

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2001

Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980) ........... 11 Evans v. Newton, 382 U.S. 296 (1966) .......... 7,11 F.D.1.C. v. Mallen, 486 U.S. 230 (1988) ......... 22 Flagg Bros. v. … Southern Maryland Health Systems Agency, 737 F.2d 399, 402 n.3 (4th Cir. 1984) (quoting Howerton v. Gabica, 708 F.2d 380, 383 (9th Cir. 1983)); see also Lugar v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Ayers v. Clark (No. 06-287)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Rptr. 399 (1990) (Clark) by extending the Bouie’ doctrine to special circumstance findings and the ex post facto prohibition to judicial] decisions. … Mendoza, 24 Cal. 4th 130, 6 P.3d 150, 99 Cal. Rptr. 2d 485 (2000); People v.

Opposition Brief — California Public Employees' Retirement System v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (No. 07-946)

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2007

The fact that the SEC has already taken such action serves only to undermine Petitioner’s argument further. 24 B. There Is No Conflict With Silver uv. … McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997). Pet. at 20-25.

Opposition Brief — Shekoyan v. Sibley International, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2006

(Compare Rec. 621-24 (1999 contract tasks/ work requirements) and 546-55 (1997 contract tasks/work requirements)) Accordingly, the staffing requirements under the new contract differed substantially … Supp. 2d at 399."

Reply Brief — DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Cuno

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2006

Id. at 50 n.24 (quoting Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664, 673 (1970). … Virginia, 6 Wheat. 264, 399-400 (1821)).

Slip Opinion — United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez

Supreme Court brief · Slip Opinion · 2006

Respondent. appealed, and the Eighth Circuit vacated the conviction. 399 F. 3d 924 (2005). … Treat, 172 U.S. 24 (1898). See generally W. Beaney, The Right to Counsel! in American Courts 18-24, 27-33 (1955). Cf. Powell, supra, at 53.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ........0...... 8 Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, err l Bolling v. … Martin, 375 U.S. 399, 402 (1964), invalidating a | state statute requiring designation of candidates’ race on electoral ballots; Shelley v.

Reply Brief — Thompson v. Western States Medical Center

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2002

No. 399, 105th Cong., Ist Sess. (1997) R. Merrill, The Architecture of Government Regula- tion of Medical Products, 82 Va. L. … No. 399, 105th Cong., Ist Sess. 94 (1997); accord S. Rep. No. 43, 105th Cong., Ist Sess. 67 (1997).

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Electric Power Service Co. Corp. v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, Washington (Nos. 06-1462, 06-1457)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

Texaco, Inc., 417 U.S. 380, 399 (1974). … Id. at 397-399. Ill. THE MOBILE AND SIERRA DECISIONS APPLY THE “JUST AND REASONABLE” STANDARD TO LIMIT THE PRICE- SETTING POWERS OF SELLERS, AND THUS TO PROTECT THE CONSUMING PUBLIC.

Opposition Brief — Jones v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1987

Hardin, 7 M.J. 399 (C.M.A. 1979) 13 United States v. Kennedy, 21 M.J. 879 (A.C.M.R. Ns tO SS ot els AS Ra ch ORS ILA heat 6 United States v. … Hardin, 7 M.J. 399, 404 (C.M.A. 1979); United States v. Yslava, 18 M.J. 670, 674 (A.C.M.R. 1984).

Petitioners Brief — Tennessee v. Street

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1985

Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) ............. 19 Delli Paoli v. United States, 352 U.S. 232 (1957) ....... 12 Douglas v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 415 (1965) ............. passim Dutton v. … (J.A. 22-24, 43-45.)

Petition — Avedisian v. Hubbard

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 399 F. ww ii CITATIONS (Cont'd) ee Se ee U.S. v. Hough, D.C. Cal 1957, Be Mar OMe dbase ccccvccces Katz v. United Spates. 389 ‘U. s. … These include making various kinds of noises--a veri- table Anvil Chorus if you will--designed 24 to coincide with my activities.

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Farrell v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969

Ct. 399, 73 L. Kd. ia (1929) ictus cease epeeoy se Farrell V.. Wyatt, 408 F. 2d 662 (2d Cir. 1969) . ey oer - Fidelity Union Trust of v. Field, 311 U. S. 169, 61 S.Ct. 176, 85 L. … S. 389, 399.

Jurisdictional Statementc — Edwards v. Healy

Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statementc · 1975

Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964) ; ee ee ets ee eS 3 (c) Palmetto Fire Insurance Company v. Connec- ticut, 272 U.S. 295 (1926). … oO RE COE | ee Se eee ES 24 V.

Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Jeremiah Stamler and Yolanda F. Hall v. Edwin E. Willis

Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1969

United States, 365 U.S. 399. ___ 14 Yellin v. United States, 374 U.S. 109_/____ 17 Young, Ex parte, 209 U.S. … The three-judge court has no. jurisdiction to grant mere declaratory relief,” ie Id., p, 24.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Proner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1969

This covered a 24 day trip to Japan: This covered a short trip to Yugoslavia, and it also covered trips within the United States to Boston, Massachusetts, to Houston, Texas. Q. Mr. … Mary- _land, Docket No. 201, this Court ordered reargument on March 24, 1969, on.the question, ‘‘ Does the concurrent sen- tence doctrine, enunciated in Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.