Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.61s
Oral argument — David Kester v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017
The seller is able to use that document to transfer title, to clean title. So what is the injury to the seller if the buyer gets clean title? I'm just not understanding. … Is there a risk after the 1-year period has passed?
21 min of audioOral argument — Houston Specialty Insurance Co v. Meadows West Con
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015
Like, for example, you have to clean out the duct work on an annual basis. Doesn't require any demolition whatsoever. … I don't know, because I don't think, it's not in the record, I don't think my insurance company insured them during those other time periods.
41 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Venjohn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024
It's plain air. It's plain air. So let's go through it briefly for a moment. Well, let me just ask you this. If Soltre were Colorado Supreme Court, you'd lose, right? Absolutely. Yes. … But it's plain air, right? So it has to be air and it has to be clear and obvious. And there was no objection. Let me ask you this.
22 min of audioOral argument — Jones v. Thorne
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2005
Jones, by design, was not a party to the enforcement consent decree, and only an action brought by the United States can implicate the Clean Water Act issues that he is concerned about. … That's a Clean Water Act claim. There was no underlying Clean Water Act claim. The question was, does this language in the consent decree allow the port to do the repair?
30 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lim
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2013
It was a clean blows. I made my closing in much greater detail th today. Then the air occur a question. … Well, I to Mr Olof's comments. He his client missus sitting the government concedes he is different.
66 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Morris
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2021
His driver's license came back clean. They searched his car with the flashlights and saw nothing there. I think at that point, they can no longer have a reason to continue to detain him. … It's the central issue in this case the district court did not air and denying that motion to suppress because Mr.
39 min of audioOral argument — Parker Wideman v. Innovative Fibers LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024
And the court explained that jurisdictional in the federal court means the power to act. And here, our power to act is conferred by section 1332. And so we have the power to act. … There was a cleaning, but each time there were these cleanings, there's no contract to do cleaning on a monthly or quarterly basis or any kind of periodic basis.
64 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2024
So that's where we get acts like the Homeland Security Act of 2002, where they're taking agencies from, you know, scattered across the government and consolidating them in, for example, under the umbrella … Air Act would have swept in many, many, many smaller sources, smaller emitters that hadn't previously been covered by the interpretation of the act, and the court didn't pause to ask whether UARG itself
24 min of audioOral argument — Air Transport Association v. AGRI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 17, 2022
But the FACT Act is enacted in 1990, and it's not until 1996 that this Treasury account is set up. And at that time, it's set up for this temporary six-year period. … Right next to that number, it says commercial air cargo only, right? And so commenters rightly wanted to figure out what does commercial air cargo only mean, okay?
49 min of audioOral argument — American Fuel & Petrochemical v. Jane O'Keeffe
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018
So this case is about the Oregon Clean Fuel Program, and it's a program that's designed to restructure the interstate market for transportation fuels in Oregon. … May it please the Court, Elaine Meckenstock for Intervenor California Air Resources Board.
46 min of audioOral argument — Illinois Council of Police v. Illinois Labor Relations Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2025
employees, certain employees designated by the governor who are excluded from the act, by the logic of the union's position, all of those would be wiped clean from the act. … The board has an obligation to administer and enforce the act, period.
28 min of audioOral argument — Borodkin v. Omni Air Int'l
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 27, 2008
In the Pilot Record Information Act, there's a preemption of state claims for defamation. That's, that's there. … I mean, it seems to me like Omni is now willing to give him a clean bill of health so he can get another job. Right?
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lloyd Kenney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2017
Second, the Affordable Care Act enhancement has a much bigger impact on Mr. Kenney's sentence. … You have a guy who's been clean, if I can use the vernacular, for 15 years. He lived a period, and maybe there would have been more than just how he was clean for 15 years.
34 min of audioOral argument — Med Center at Elizabeth Pl v. Atrium health System
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 25, 2018
They viewed that as because the defendants, the record shows, had between 56 and 58 percent of the market during this time period. Each of these payers viewed them as a must-have. … You can say you have to show clear air before you change your mind at the same level of a case. You obviously can't reverse someone above you.
31 min of audioOral argument — Aldelphia, Inc v. Heritage Crystal Clean, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2019
You made the comment that we should put additional costs. It's not true. I know your honors have seen it. … The previous period. So we assess what fuel costs were for us in period one, and when invoices go out for period two, it's based on that. It's the previous period.
49 min of audioOral argument — ONRC Action v. US Bureau of Reclamation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2014
And it was asked during commenting period to be put in the definition section. Seems to be a much more reasonable spot for it because they're defining the word addition differently. … The final issue, I may add, is that the Bureau itself in 1975 suggested that they were going to be getting a Clean Water Act permit as the law stood in 1975.
48 min of audioOral argument — Ellis v. City of Chicago
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2016
In addition to that, they clean them every other spring, and the last time that they were cleaned was in May of 2005. There was no regular cleaning. … And it seems to be acting up. And that's what the jury had the right to look at here. As for these other issues, they are approximate cause issues. They are multiple cause issues.
44 min of audioOral argument — Kristin Simmons v. UM Capital Region Health, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025
Simmons, two supervisors in this case, Yojin Lee and Ingrid Connerney, were brought in to the hospital to ameliorate that issue and to clean up infection prevention and to clean up safety within the hospital … Simmons engaged in protected activity under the Federal False Claims Act and the Maryland False Claims Act.
44 min of audioOral argument — Cosmos Jewelry, Ltd. v. Po Sun Hon Co.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2008
So I would certainly agree with your comments, Your Honor. … I also wanted to address the comment that it doesn't replicate nature.
50 min of audioOral argument — Darryl Nedds v. John Marshall
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2011
He was relatively locked down free for a six-month period. … So why just taking Evans isn't this a good period to be told?
25 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.