Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
1,016 results
0.29s
Oral argument — Nuveen Municipal Trustv.Withumsmith Brown
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2012
We'd like to reserve 4 minutes for rebuttal, but of course permission to give comments and preparation and expertise to divide that amount of time to each of us. … I think in proving fraud, it would necessarily imputate the idea that the two firms didn't act as they should have acted because when you have a fraud claim, you obviously are always making that argument
76 min of audioOral argument — Martinez v. UPMC Susquehanna
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020
This isn't a case where somebody just sort of says, I was discriminated against, period, full stop. It's stating, here were the comparators, and they are significantly younger. … Human Relations Act.
47 min of audioOral argument — Gerald Carroll v. E One Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2018
At heart, and the way you act. But it is unique. And, Your Honor, once again, I would remind the court that we chose not to put evidence on, correctly or incorrectly, from this thing. … Miller's comment. All right. Well, if it's not in the record, I would advise you not to argue, assuming that it is in the record. What I would say that is in the record is that Mr.
35 min of audioOral argument — Veterans Guardian v. Platkin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2024
I mean, I'm not commenting either way on what I think about Upsolve, but I think a huge difference between Upsolve and this case. … But it's not okay with that in the same time period if it's given by private speakers who are receiving their compensation not through payment by the government, but through payment by the claimant.
98 min of audioOral argument — Funk v. CIGNACorp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2011
However, there was no information, no notes to support the diagnosis during the relevant time period. There was no information regarding the extent of the symptoms provided by Dr. Pinchot. … Cheney and the discussion in there about the difference between a court acting and a court not acting. So why don't you address that point?
80 min of audioOral argument — Bellon v. Superintendent Benner Twp SCI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2023
So I thought in reading the Superior Court opinion, you commented that the Superior Court was incorrect because he did have a new sentence. … I mean, keep in mind, we have like now the experience with the Fair Sentencing Act, the First Step Act, where as federal courts, we don't require there to be a plenary sentencing proceeding.
66 min of audioOral argument — MacDonald v. President NJ State Board Medical
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2026
So going back to comment made by Judge Hardeman, you kind of hope he's out of the woods. It never comes back for his sake. … And here there's an unbroken record, um, except for a brief period, I think during the Jackson administration of medical licensure.
48 min of audioOral argument — Garlick v. Trans Tech
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2015
If you look at the two day period where Mr. Garlick traveled at the sign-in sheets, there were over 250 truck deliveries on that two days, just two days. Mr. … Larson, finish up your last comment. Mr. Larson testified and this is in the record of 1468.
36 min of audioOral argument — Plavin v. Group Health
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 15, 2019
There was no well-planned allegation that this was a common act that affected many other universities. … I want to, at the outset, tell the court, it's John Gleeson for the athlete, at the outset say it's our position and it's strongly felt that there are no misrepresentations here and no misleading comments
55 min of audioOral argument — Renfro v. Unisys Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2011
Now, I just want to comment very briefly. There could not be a sufficiently alleged complaint under Twombly and Iqbal if somebody claims that you could have negotiated, you know, what is it? … That's different from the selection of investment options where the fiduciaries have acted before any participant has acted.
48 min of audioOral argument — Carr v. Jefferson Defined Benefit Plan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025
That is in the state of flux now in light of the Montanil statements and comments as to whether or not the dicta in Amara should be at least adhered to. … Carr for more hours than they gave her credit under this last payroll period accounting method. They actually paid her for more than 1,000 hours in 1997.
50 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Genentech Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016
The Medicare contractor denied the claim after a certain period and said those services could have been provided on an outpatient basis. It was no longer reasonable and necessary. … And basically Jimentech's position is that whether or not Jimentech did anything wrong or they're not commenting on that, but that at best they cause a submission of true claims because CMS and the FDA
57 min of audioOral argument — 20_2078_BC v. Atty Gen USA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2021
Because if you recall, the executive order indicated a 120 day period. But beyond that, and you saw, we sort of threw at the court additional appendix. … Most things that are binding go through comment rulemaking.
84 min of audioOral argument — Santomenno v. John Hancock Life Ins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014
Before I get into the specific subsections of the definition of functional fiduciary upon which we're relying, I would just like to briefly make two preliminary comments. … Now, counsel also argued with this fund check, which was a periodic publication that John Hancock made available to trustees and participants.
41 min of audioOral argument — Belles v. Wilkes Barre Area School District
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2020
Bells couldn't identify the students, and as to the third student, he admitted that students' comments weren't harassing or creating a hostile environment. … Added with the fact that the ADA does not set a predefined time period which to institute the accommodation. Most importantly, as Your Honor pointed out, this happened, his election was in May.
43 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Rivera
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026
Wynn's comment was they look the same. They are the same. And I think that that's highly relevant. And then the four year delay. … In fact, he was he was tasked with being outside acting as a lookout, whereas even Special Agent Baber testified that Mr. Rivera, if he was there, would have been inside the garage with a mask on.
37 min of audioOral argument — Jester v. Hutt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2019
Bradshaw, on the concordance between the monthly boarding fee and the number of months beyond the invoice period that the horse has remained at your client's. … Before I get to the punitive damages, just a couple of comments on some of the other issues in response to Mr. Bradshaw. In terms of Mr. Hutt's experience and background as an insurance person, Mr.
46 min of audioOral argument — Falcone v. Dickstein
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 27, 2023
I will confine my comments to the Falcone case. I represent Officer Miroslav Alfeldi and the Freehold Police Department. I'll address the questions raised in reverse order. … Falcone's point of view, but that does not make the act itself symbolic.
89 min of audioOral argument — Pristine Pools LL C v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2026
Because it's not just surrounding property period, right? Paragraph 141C talks about damaging, raking, and or fracturing the pool and surrounding property as a result of the negligent construction. … Now, Your Honor, and that's the Massey case from Friday, I'm not going to comment on why the court decided not to send that to the New Jersey Supreme Court for decision.
47 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2011
Works for him for a period of time, then what she does, her rule infraction is to associate with another pimp, in this case Franklin Robinson. … That was the point of the presiding judge making that comment. Exactly. And you gave me a little bit of chance to prepare.
55 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.