Documents

Oral argument — D'Angiolini v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2016

The Special Master specifically forgot the imperative dictative often, that is, the purpose of the Vaccines Act's preponderance standard is to allow the finding of causation in a field bereft of complete … DeAngelini was chronically fatigued, period. Nothing to do with the ancillary criteria. It would have been better if the government lawyer examining Dr.

Oral argument — TEVA PHARMA v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2011

They say you've got to appreciate which part of the compound acts as a stabilizer. Right. That's the issue here. It's not inherency. Well, inherency doesn't seem to me to get you anywhere. … We've stuck with it, and it's been all this period of time. As to Heitzman, there is a discussion in Heitzman about HERD and whether or not there is accidental anticipation.

Oral argument — Allergan, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

I also want to comment that it is the case consistently that the authorities from the other circuits do say that Rule 60B relief is sort of the exception. … Filing an amendment to an ANDA is not an act of contempt. That was the Abbott v. Torfarm case. The new ANDA isn't an act of contempt.

Oral argument — Star Scientific v. RJ Reynolds

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2008

Then it goes on to talk about what the lawyers did not do after the May-June 2002 period. … He makes a comment. He talks about the incentives.

Oral argument — NEXTEC APPLICATIONS v. BROOKWOOD CO

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2013

They are very high-level comments that go specifically to whether he saw the development effort. … We acted like our own lexicographer, and we ought to be able to get that issue vacated and remanded.

Oral argument — Michael Stapleton Associates, Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2024

You can ask any question you like, and I would love to comment on the OCI, but I have nothing to say in rebuttal on that point, the only point that we briefed. Please. … Franklin in 2021 and then acted upon in a very responsible, very thorough way by at least four Postal Service.

Oral argument — Capella Sales & Services Ltd. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017

I don't really understand your comment that Congress didn't say whether it's all entries or not. I mean, Congress separated the classifications of entries. How could it be anything less than all? … arguing here to not be subject to such a high rate in this case these are unique circumstances because this is a CVD investigation it involves a rate that has been judicially invalidated the two year period

Oral argument — SEMICONDUCTOR v. NAGATA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2012

He attempted to extort money from SEL by demanding that he be paid for a period of four years, demanding that he be paid additional compensation for his inventorship many years earlier. … I suggest that the declaratory judgment act does not extend that far to permit such a claim to be made.

Oral argument — Jadue v. DHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2026

And there's a law that says that you have to take it, do it in a certain period of time. Correct. … The claim arises, your claim arises out of the law that says that the EEO has to act in a certain period of time. Yes, but it is the mixed case authority in the statute.

Oral argument — Abbott Labs v. Sandoz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2007

The C-minimum, a person of ordinary skill in the art wants to keep the effect of the antibiotic across the entire 24-hour period. … Nothing in the Supreme Court decision indicates that that should be changed, and in fact the Supreme Court itself admonished this Court to act in accordance with other areas of law.

Oral argument — +Paice v. Toyota Motor

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2007

Well, Your Honor, I was going to say four minutes and I want to just comment briefly on part of the cross appeal if that's all right. … And so, why does the act, the law, have to expressly authorize something in between? Are they just permissible extremes but nothing in between?

Oral argument — RANDALL MFG. v. REA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2013

Why isn't that sufficient motivation to take, if you were starting with Aquino, to take what I understand to be a system in which the—well, I guess period. … So you would just give your reasoning as to why you thought the board's rejection was an error and send it back to the Patent Office, and we would act accordingly. So there's no further questions.

Oral argument — Realtime Data, LLC v. CME Group, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015

Issued separately from other act motions do not analyze issues of infringement or validity. And that's referring to this early claim construction that Judge Feltzer was referring back to. … She did, you know, for example, if you look at her order, and again, we've just got the one page, but on 134, she comments each time she talks about the different factors that we put forward.

Oral argument — Two-Way Media LLC v. AT&T, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

Suppose it's in an envelope that says, Act now and you can improve your credit score. And the return address says Experian or one of the other credit companies. … It wasn't receipt of that order during the 30-day period. It was after the 30-day period. And there was nothing misleading. Let's not get away from this issue about the label.

Oral argument — Easter v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2009

in this case, but there are other cases where there's something called field work where someone is assigned to work at a field location in the same general area, not talking about 10 hours away, for a period … They were subject to notice and comment, and they were based upon the Labor Department's view. Well, I think, sir, that's a sufficient answer to the question, and our time has expired.

Oral argument — HAGE v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 3, 2012

What is your comment about the Court of Federal Claims conclusion that the fact that he did not request permits after 1986 was excusable because it was just a matter of futility? … But as Judge Smith noticed, this is a mining act of 1866 ditch. It was Mr. Hage's, or at least the property of Mr.

Oral argument — Flores v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2014

And as Judge Sweeney commented, the special master's decision reveals a thorough review of all of the... That's a bit questionable that it wasn't a close case, right? … They had prolonged periods of arterial hypotension.

Oral argument — Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Shower Enclosures America, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2020

In fact, the Board also commented on the idea that the stops were attached to the rails, and they had a problem with that with Claim 6 also, that the stops were on the rails and that we had not explained … And under the Administrative Procedure Act, they're required to articulate their findings and apply those findings reasonably to the issues of law.

Oral argument — JBLU, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2016

I mean, I understand that marks, you know, under the Lanham Act can apply to both registered and unregistered, claimed or unclaimed. … Under the Lanham Act, yes. And in every dictionary.

Oral argument — Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2025

Do you want to just any comment on the counting away formulation? Yes. … It was approved by the 505B2 pathway in the Hatch-Waxman Act. So it's not that the world is precluded from using this drug for many years.