Documents

Oral argument — In re Marriage of McDonald

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2019

Judge Rosenbaum mentioned the spill tea, taking the train lift off of the bike, being silly in a drive-thru, lack of air conditioning. … As parents, you're not supposed to comment on dad's behavior. You're supposed to have somebody independent do that. Who other than Dr. Osgood is supposed to do that? She's an independent expert.

Oral argument — Kramer v. Village of Round Lake Beach

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

Both of those are non-Tort Immunity Act cases that involve the common law definition. You can find plenty of cases out there from that period of time earlier that use the word reckless. … Obviously, the court gets to consider some facts, but the comments to it say you can't try. There's a disputed question.

Oral argument — United National Insurance. v. Faure Brothers Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2011

The warehouse worker, as air products charged, was careless and negligent in making this mistake here. And the underlying complaint never alleged that this was intentional or non- or intentional. … The courts have looked to the consequences, not the mental state of the act.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Marks

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010

Then there were air tickets for Bill and Todd. So the majority of that is tuition as tuition, which was his obligation. I'm not saying it's not his obligation. … In addition, you'll note in Judge Marthein's opinion that she chooses to comment on his testimony about his lack of income from his corporation.

Oral argument — People v. Fiveash

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 25, 2014

in the Juvenile Court Act. … And the trial court did not air in granting defendant's motion to dismiss the charges since the state was unwilling to accept the transfer of the charges to juvenile court.

Oral argument — Nunez v. Diaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

And what we have here is no clearly delineated acts. There is no pattern of repairs showing control in the landlord. … And I would like to comment on Goula briefly. In that case, it makes perfect sense why the landlord was held to retain control of enough of the stairway to be actionable.

Oral argument — People v. Gutierrez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2010

And so it wasn't like this lady was dead or came in as a cadaver and they're cleaning up the body as funeral homes do to prepare the body for a funeral. He had sex with a dead body. … This all occurred within a short period of time in the defendant's apartment. There's no doubt here that it was one continuous act. With respect to the issue of Batson, there are three steps.

Oral argument — People v. Carson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

But at this stage, it's just the cleaning stages. The question is whether or not he made a substantial showing. I think based on those allegations and based on Mr. … I think based on that, this issue would demand a second stage remand act for a new second stage post-conviction.

Oral argument — Heritage Square Development, LLC v. ZUZU, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 22, 2011

If that was the only reason that he was going to base the duress decision on was that that lockout was the wrongful act. But, in fact, he looked at several factors. … What is there is what Zia Madnot says, which he says, his attorney, he threw the papers in the air, he said, I don't want to sign this, and that his attorney said, you've got to sign it to get the doors

Oral argument — Dunham v. Howd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

What is it about those two acts that make you feel or believe that this conduct fell within those two acts? … And in each motion to dismiss, was this air reporting privilege raised? I know it was for the last. I would assume that it was on the others, but I'm not.

Oral argument — McClanahan v. McClanahan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

And, in fact, he made several comments on June 23, 2017, and he also commented on the motion for reconsideration that he reads this statute differently than other judges do. … Illinois Domestic Violence Act.

Oral argument — 1-19-0784

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 18, 2020

So what the trial court did was take alphabet, I'm sorry, mathematical soup, throw it up in the air, and come to a figure that provides Mr. … I would like to tell you, I'm going to keep my comments to 4% of the allocated time. Accordingly, I don't think I can do that because I'd have to stop like right now.

Oral argument — People v. Reed

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2014

As far as the argument that it was kind of up in the air whether or not a bench death penalty eligibility, the Bailey court said, no, that was never up in the air. … there was a strong probability that he was committing acts that would lead to death or great bodily harm.

Oral argument — Stiegman v. Stiegman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019

At the time she married him, he was based in England at an Air Force base. Shortly thereafter, he had been based in the Crestview, Florida area. … So they were, they hadn't spent a lot of time together over the three years period of time.

Oral argument — City of West Frankfort v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2020

Well, your honor, again, that was the what the circuit court did, and they would have been in an air of doing that, I believe. … I would comment, Mr. Sheehan, that your opponent suffers from the same difficulty because your opponent thinks this is appealable under 301 and 303.

Oral argument — People v. Wallace

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Charles Wallace has always had those rights, and when he invoked them during the Miranda Act, they should have been respected. … But in questioning whether or not the file was suppressed in the first place, no, because that question mark is in the air and it could have been dispositive of this case.

Oral argument — People v. Armstrong

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 25, 2025

It's very possible that Armstrong was there at another time and that is how his blood ended up on the scene and that it didn't get cleaned up. … A defendant's criminal acts are the proximate cause of death when the acts contribute to that person's death, and the death is not caused by an intervening act unrelated to the defendant's acts.

Oral argument — Pontiac Flying Services v. Schiffer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010

They cleaned up some allegations in the complaint. … You are reposing your trust and confidence in them to act on your behalf and here acting on their behalf was putting our trust in you to make this bid to get the contract which we can perform in the same

Oral argument — City of Metropolis v. Burr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2025

And the motive procedure statute in the Mortgage Foreclosure Act, in that article, it says it applies to any action filed under the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Act. … So giving them the benefit of the doubt, where the Blatches defense really fails, is the short period of time.

Oral argument — Sharbono v. Hilborn

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2013

This was a very clean two and a half week trial that Mr. Rickley and I participated in. Spent three days picking jurors, four a day. … So we basically fell into that gap period of time where there wasn't a clear direction on whether or not the IPI was going to be reasonably well-qualified or reasonably careful.