Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.57s
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 17, 2014
Quality Standard (NAAQS or “standard”) because the request meets the statutory requirements for redesignation under the Clean Air Act. … Responses to Comments on the Proposed Rule EPA's March 26, 2014 proposed rule provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received two comment letters.
79 FR 55645Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 16, 2009
“State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (ACT) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; 6. … Clean Air Interstate Rule in Surrounding States. State Control Measures Clean Air Bill. NO X SIP Call/Clean Air Interstate Rule. Clean Smokestacks Act.
74 FR 53198Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Apr 30, 2004
Air Act (CAA). … Abstract: This information collection is a voluntary application from S/L/Ts for delegation of regulations developed under section 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
69 FR 23739Environmental Protection AgencyNational Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; National Priorities List
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 27, 1996
Upon completion of the thirty (30) day public comment period, EPA will evaluate all comments received before issuing the final decision on the partial deletion. … EPA will prepare a Responsiveness Summary for comments received during the public comment period and will address concerns presented in the comments.
61 FR 50788Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 13, 2006
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7413. … The United States' complaint alleges that at some or all of the twelve plants subject to the proposed consent decree, one of the Defendants violated Clean Air Act requirements related to: Part C of Title
71 FR 66196Justice DepartmentFederal Register · Rule · Sep 13, 2007
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed action. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 52286Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 17, 2014
a public comment period; and (3) EPA taking action on the MVEB. … This comment period is concurrent with the comment period on this proposed action and comments should be submitted to the docket for this rulemaking.
79 FR 62389Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 6, 2005
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Air Act.
70 FR 38840Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 12, 2013
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a State Plan submittal that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 21846Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Availability; Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Orlando Gasification Project
Federal Register · Notice · Aug 24, 2006
DATES: DOE invites the public to comment on the Draft EIS during the public comment period, which ends October 10, 2006. … DOE will consider all comments postmarked or received during the public comment period in preparing the Final EIS, and will consider late comments to the extent practicable.
71 FR 50051Energy DepartmentFederal Register · Rule · Dec 3, 2019
to a full approval; and approve the states' submissions addressing the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) provision (prong 4) that prohibit emissions activity in one state from … The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are met because the Regional Haze plan submitted by Iowa on March 25, 2008 and supplemented on May 14, 2019, includes fully approvable measures for
84 FR 66075Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Rule · May 18, 2000
This Plan is intended to fulfill the requirements of section 182(b)(1)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). DATES: This rule is effective on June 19, 2000. … for any growth in emissions after the year in which the Clean Air Act Amendments are enacted.”
65 FR 31485Environmental Protection AgencyTemporary Closure of the Dockets Unit
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 25, 1996
In an effort to improve the indoor air quality in the Nassif Building, the U.S. Department of Transportation and the building's owner have initiated a major cleaning project. … It will provide public access to those rulemakings dockets in which the comment period will be open during, and those in which the comment will have closed just prior to, the closure of the Dockets Unit
61 FR 38798Transportation DepartmentApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Florida
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 1, 1996
In order to extend the Federal enforceability of Florida's FESOP program to hazardous air pollutants (HAP), EPA is also approving Florida's FESOP program pursuant to section 112 of the Clean Air Act as … Through submission of this state implementation plan or plan revision, the State has elected to adopt the program provided for under Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act.
61 FR 3572Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 8, 1998
Background Under section 107(d)(4)(B) of the Clean Air Act (Act), as amended on November 15, 1990 (amended Act), certain areas (``initial areas'') were designated nonattainment for PM. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. EPA., 427 U.S. 246, 256-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). E. Unfunded Mandates.
63 FR 47431Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 18, 1997
Michigan's emissions trading credit and averaging rules are not a required SIP submission under the Clean Air Act (the Act). … Air Act.
62 FR 48972Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 27, 2010
This action is being taken in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 59084Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 3, 2008
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the 1990 Clean Air Act, EPA granted delegation of specific national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) to the Nevada Division of Environmental … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: March 19, 2008.
73 FR 18229Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 26, 2009
The negative declaration certifies that other solid waste incinerator units, which are subject to the requirements of sections 111(d) and 129 of the Clean Air Act, do not exist within the agency's air … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses a Clean Air Act section 111(d)/129 negative declaration submitted by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality certifying that other solid
74 FR 13170Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 11, 2002
As of May 31, 2004, Kentucky's plan will also provide reductions at units currently required to make reductions under the EPA's Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 126 rulemaking. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 17624Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.