Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2003

10,000+ results

0.25s

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Christopher William Kuehner, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 16, 2025

    J.A. 123–24. “Nechris” gave a “thumbs up” reaction to a crude comment by Larson about MV3’s body. … Daniels, 653 F.3d 399, 412 (6th Cir. 2011). Not a single circuit has interpreted the child exploitation enterprises statute in the manner urged by Kuehner.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Derek Capozzi, Petitioner v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2025

    Supp. 3d 399, 407 (D. Mass. 2021) ("Capozzi II"). … Supp. 3d 399, 405 (D. Mass. 2021). He does not pursue this issue on appeal.

  • Appellees Brief — Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. Walters

    Supreme Court brief · Appellees Brief · 1935

    Co., 128 Tenn., 399.... 12 Chicago & A. R. Co. v. Tranbarger, 238 U. S., 67.. 25 Chicago B. & Q. R. Co. v. IIL, 200 U. S., 561 ... .25, 27, 28 Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. McGuire. 219 U. … S., 24, 73 L. ed., 161, this Court sustained an order requiring a railroad to eliminate two grade crossings at a cost of $324,000.00.

    294 U.S. 405
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993

    Member banks are also interested in the sale of other insurance-related products permitted under Section 24 (Seventh) of the NBA, 12 U.S.C. § 24 (Seventh) (“Section 24 (Seventh)”). … (OCC Peti- tion at 12-15; Chase Petition at 23-24).

    508 U.S. 971
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974

    Camp, 897 U.S. 150 ...0-..0............. 24 Bakery Sales Drivers Union v. Wagshal, 333 U.S. 487, 422 (1948) 6, 21 Barlow v. Collins, 397 U.S. 159 24 Boggess V. … Martin, 202 F. 2d 398, 399 (CA 5, 1953).

    416 U.S. 115
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Jimcy McGirt, Petitioner v. Oklahoma

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 11, 2020

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ...................................................2 Herrera v. Wyoming, 139 S. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411 (1994)).

  • Record and brief — Torres v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982

    Ohio, supra, 392 U.S. at 23-24, 30. … Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 52 (1970) ; Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).

    456 U.S. 973
  • Adoption of Statement

    Federal Register · Notice · Oct 7, 2015

    Vilsach , 707 F.3d 394, 399 (D.C. … • The issue was addressed by the agency on its own initiative in the rulemaking. 24 24   Id.

    80 FR 60611Administrative Conference of the United States
  • Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Price Improvement XL Pricing

    Federal Register · Notice · Jul 28, 2016

    Initiating Order Fee for Professional, Firm, Broker-Dealer, Specialist and Market Maker orders that are contra to a Customer PIXL Order will be reduced to $0.00 if the Customer PIXL Order is greater than 399 … Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act. 24 24  15

    81 FR 49709Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Ohio Edison Company, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

    Federal Register · Notice · Nov 22, 2000

    ER01-399-000] Take notice that on November 9, 2000, Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Metropolitan Edison Company and Pennsylvania Electric Company (individually doing business as GPU Energy), tendered … Comment date: November 30, 2000, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 24.

    65 FR 70340Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
  • Initial Decision Release No. 1349

    Agency decision · Agency decision

    White, 408 F.3d 399, 402–03 (8th Cir. 2005) (finding that a defendant’s guilty plea did not constitute an admission to facts that the defendant disavowed during his plea hearing); Valansi v. … Ex. 1 at 1–2 23 Id. at 2. 24 Id. 25 Id. OIP at 2; Div. Ex. 1 at 1–2; see 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b); 18 U.S.C. §§ 1014, 1341; 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5. 26 27 Div.

    Securities and Exchange Commission
  • Amicus Brief — United States v. Mitchell

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1980

    Act of Mar. 3, 1887, ch. 359, 24 Stat. 505 (1887). … Testan, supra 424 U.S. at 399, quoting Sherwood. The determination of what causes of action fall within those limits can be a more detailed inquiry.

    445 U.S. 535
  • Appellants Reply Brief — Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. Finance Administration

    Supreme Court brief · Appellants Reply Brief · 1982

    Times, Apr. 24, 1981, §1, at 1, col. 2. … First, in 1969, the Legislature amended New York Real Property Tax Law §720(3), Act of April 27, 1969, ch. 302, McKinney’s 1969 New York Session Laws 399, and permitted exclusive reliance upon the State

    459 U.S. 983
  • Rule 4-202.02. Records Classification.

    Court rules · Court rule

    Records Classification. 4 5 6 To classify court records as public or non-public. 7 8 9 This rule applies to the judicial branch. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 … facility; CJA 4-202.02 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Juan Thomas, Petitioner v. Steven Johnson, Administrator, New Jersey State Prison, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Nov 28, 2018

    May 11, 2018) New Jersey Statutes and Rules N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2a N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2b N.J.S.A. 20:14-2c N.J.S.A. 2C:24-4a N.J. … Mahanoy, 654 F.3d 385, 399 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting Holland, supra 130 S.Ct. at 2563). There are "no bright lines in determining whether equitable tolling is warranted in a given case." Id.

  • Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Bowker v. Hunter

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1947

    S. 19, 24, 59 S. Ct. 442, i Tn Mth. cekeabkaeeesenenanaschaceeeses . Bowker v. Hunter, 158 F. 2d. 854................. 6 Bozza v. … ‘‘transport or cause to be transported’’ under Section 2 (398) and ‘‘induced to go in interstate commerce’’ under Section 3 (399). ) Circuit Judge Kenyon dissented.

    331 U.S. 861
  • petition for a writ of certiorari — Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina Ex Rel. Daniel

    Supreme Court brief · petition for a writ of certiorari · 1930

    S., 113, 126; 24 L. Bé., TT, BAL cc cee se a a a ne Ne recn: cjhakeea tet eee ‘ eau s a © Savcnds eta linay saccg ites cenaseeuseusces® | Oo; +. … Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, 126, 24 L. ed., 77, 84.

    282 U.S. 187
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Veneklase v. City of Fargo

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996

    The Petitioners’ motion for rehearing was denied by the Eighth Circuit on April 24, 1996. Jurisdiction is conferred on this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1254(1). … Mason, 412 U.S. 391, 399-400, (1973). This is consistent with this Court’s statement in Mazs- lin Industries, U.S. v.

    519 U.S. 867
  • Brief for the Respondents in Opposition — Sheridan v. Rothensies

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondents in Opposition · 1942

    The (1) Ber 2 petition for a writ of certiorari was filed on Jan- uary 24, 1942. … Mitchell, 303 U.S. 391, 399-405, 44542142» Dive i A PERK Tal 2 ee | Boo A ae gem ganreermaseriaiss SEN INT EOI IS NAN IR BE pe Re isiienie _ ¥ » lias 8 And there is nothing in the history of Article

    315 U.S. 815
  • Opposition Brief — C & D Charter Power Systems, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1996

    Id. at 400 (footnote omitted); see also id. at 399 & n.4. … 1075 (42 U.S.C. 2000e-2(m), 2000e-5(g)(2)(B)), applies to mixed-motive cases aris- ing under the National Labor Relations Act and limits the Board’s remedial authority in such cases. 10 Pet. 21-24

    519 U.S. 1006

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.