Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.81s
Oral argument — Toya Crain v. Denis McDonough
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2023
They cleaned the hospital, and in the acting chief position, she was a GS-12. … There's the improperly advised a candidate evidence, then there's evidence with regard to the profanity, the cleaning solutions, the failure to complete the probationary period, then the handling of the
20 min of audioOral argument — Sherif El Dabe v. Calavo Growers, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 6, 2017
The Diamonds district court stated, a clean audit opinion may possibly support the conclusion that defendants did not act with scienter, and that's where the district court stopped. … Well, number one, that you have three clean audits.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Banks
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 18, 2006
So our standard review here is plain air? In all probability, yeah. But, I mean, again, if it's a — If you don't object to a jury instruction, our law is clear. It's plain air. … We require that they read the statute or act in peril if they don't read it. That's all.
37 min of audioOral argument — Secof Labor v. Trinity
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 22, 2009
But as this court said in the Clean Ocean case, as long as that regulation is on the books, the Secretary of Labor is bound by it. … The fact that the Trinity failed to test, that's the reason we don't have air samples or monitoring data.
40 min of audioOral argument — Bread for the City v. US Department of Agriculture
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2017
A couple quick clean-up points to your question, Judge Rogers. I'd point you to pages 33 and 34 of the addendum. … What's the admissions threshold for getting a Clean Air Act permit? Is it 200 tons per year, 220 tons per year? How about spending on defense or education?
41 min of audioOral argument — Vicaulic Comp v. Tieman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009
The Act, the Pennsylvania Trade Secrets Act, does provide for the potential of injunctive relief. … But an injunction was entered in Air Products, right?
41 min of audioOral argument — E.T. v. Paxton
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2022
It does, but the finding is not supported and we believe would fall under either clear air review or as we noted in our brief, because the District Court's ADA and Rehabilitation Act analysis is so fundamentally … Actually, there was about a four-day period where that school lifted its mask mandate because a lot of students were vaccine eligible.
63 min of audioOral argument — Gino Velez Scott v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018
And perhaps that might that should be the test if there is more than a colorable claim although I believe all claims of prosecutorial misconduct should be aired. … 55 which Stuart and Tompkins said you can't do right and I understand all of that but my point is simply we're trying to decide yes there are two things we're trying to decide did the district court act
37 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Martinez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2024
My client did not participate, nor did my client act as an office manager over the medical staff and didn't write prescriptions. … And he's commenting on that previously discussed medical situation. It's an ongoing relationship he has with the hospital.
36 min of audioOral argument — Center for Community Action v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2021
It held 47-day public comment period. It held a public workshop. It held a public hearing. It issued a 223-page long environmental assessment with approximately 3,800 pages of appendices. … And during that period of time, the project was refined.
45 min of audioOral argument — Pekin Insurance Co. v. Centex Homes
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2016
Sounds to me this is the second fight in the air, but with CSR. Right. Well, I… How many fights do you want on this issue? I don't know. … Counsel, one parting comment I'd like to make. In your brief, you cited Pekin v. Hawk, which is a Rule 23. Yes, Your Honor.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ronald Norman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2015
Let me ask you this in respect of whether we should sous-spante, notice it, or plein air, or any of these other things that involve some element of discretion. … The fact of the gun being dirty or clean, the fact of who testified that they found the gun, which by the way, as I point out in my brief, there were no inconsistencies here. Mr.
30 min of audioOral argument — American Rivers v. American Petroleum Institute
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2022
Now, the case here involves EPA's 2020 Clean Water Act Section 401 rule. That rule was the product of a multi-year rulemaking process and was informed by more than 100,000 public comments. … The rule that was vacated, as I understand it, basically put some time limitations on the act, the Clean Water Act, so that if a tribe, for example, didn't respond within a year, then the response was
57 min of audioOral argument — Kathy Talley v. Michael Astrue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2010
She was able to do the cleaning, mopping, washing dishes, doing the laundry at these clients' homes. And she even worked at cleaning houses during the relevant time period. … And so any comments they made were done before they saw any ‑‑ without seeing any kind of testing.
18 min of audioOral argument — Bais Yaakov of Spring Valley v. Federal Communications Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2016
And recall that this act, this Jump Fax Prevention Act, actually expanded the rights of senders of faxes after the FCC had curtailed them. … It doesn't matter that the statute, the Clean Air Act, provides for the fact that you can sue for violation of the regulation created by the EPA. This Court said EPA has no authority to do that.
90 min of audioOral argument — People v. Nelson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2019
So you want us to address it under plain air? I'm playing it. That's correct. You want us to address it on plain air on the first bomb? Yes, thank you for clarifying. It's a first bomb. … So when you're looking at intent, you're looking at the apus reus, the criminal act. Did the person who did the criminal act have the intent?
29 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. Donald Trump
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 12, 2019
Act. … We have laws to enforce the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, which Congress has specifically said apply to federal construction projects, and through their series of actions, it's really one set
55 min of audioOral argument — Esteban Garcia v. Professional Contract Svc Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2019
Professional Contract Services Company for a period of 10 years before his termination. … King Solve Pharmaceuticals, this court applies the McDonnell-Douglas framework for False Claims Act anti-retaliation claims.
41 min of audioOral argument — David Kester v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017
The seller is able to use that document to transfer title, to clean title. So what is the injury to the seller if the buyer gets clean title? I'm just not understanding. … Is there a risk after the 1-year period has passed?
21 min of audioOral argument — Houston Specialty Insurance Co v. Meadows West Con
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2015
Like, for example, you have to clean out the duct work on an annual basis. Doesn't require any demolition whatsoever. … I don't know, because I don't think, it's not in the record, I don't think my insurance company insured them during those other time periods.
41 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.