Documents

Oral argument — Dreher v. Attorney General NJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2010

The decision by Judge Del Boise was reached in 2001, by which time we were already past the five-year period of time when state post-conviction could have been commenced. … And I do think, as the trial court recognized, and you have to be recognized, all her comments have to be viewed in the prism of how she viewed herself.

Oral argument — Figueroa v. Attorney General USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2020

When the Immigration and Nationality Act was amended with the Illegal Immigration Responsibility Act and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, the INA was amended to include the language, quote, life or … How did those acts of violence carry your burden? I mean, the 18th gang commits acts of violence in this country.

Oral argument — TRI3 Enterprises, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2013

And as they say in Paragraph 20, unfairly accusing them of violating the False Claims Act. … I wouldn't make any comment on the merits of the fraud issue one way or the other.

Oral argument — LW v. Jersey City Board Education

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025

I also just want to emphasize another point too about the comment about even if she received these documents. I'm sorry, you're talking about Mr. LoCicero's statements? … GL discussed that the congressional intent in including a statute of limitation provisions in the act was to promote trust between school districts and families because the act contemplates collaboration

Oral argument — Lincoln T. Griswold v. Coventry First LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

And the reason that the Supreme Court has had to act so vigorously is because state courts and some federal courts, but predominantly state courts have acted with hostility to arbitration, and because … And if you look at comment G and read it, it just couldn't be clear.

Oral argument — Stanley L.Holmes v. Christopher Holmes,etal.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 23, 2016

Holmes remained in the car for some period of time, then got out and ultimately was apprehended by the police officer. That testimony was identical in both of these trials. … But I wanted your comment on that. Well, the State acknowledged that the defendant was never in the house.

Oral argument — United States v. Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2020

In Fiorelli, the habeas petitioner who was acting pro se titled his motion as a Rule 60 motion. This court, in accordance with liberally construing pro se pleadings, it didn't look to the title. … However, from your prior comments, I believe we have reached a point of agreement that there is no jurisdiction in here unless, in this case, unless there is some unusual exception.

Oral argument — Sheet Metal Workers Int Assoc v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2013

I understand the comments. … We had the ADA, the EPA, Voting Rights Act, Civil Rights Act. They were really making decision stuff. They were doing all of it.

Oral argument — Penske Logistics LLC v. Fright Drivers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

As to the second question about the timing, we have a statute, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and the Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act, which deals with, if you will, very draconian … I didn't understand that comment. I'm sorry, can you... You believe what, sir? There had been... We really believed that there had been another determination. That's to say... Another determination?

Oral argument — BS v. Somerset Countyetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2012

I have several comments on that, if I can. Number one, there was no dependency proceedings. So you'd have to say... … But that statute is separate from the Juvenile Act.

Oral argument — In Re Energy Future Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 3, 2020

One point that you did raise was, well, isn't the time period, to think about it, day one where you approve the transaction, day two, reconsideration time period, and then moving forward. … Ghilardi made a comment. I really want to emphasize this.

Oral argument — United States v. Metro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2017

And the court seemed to think that clearly determined the case, but it made no factual findings, period, even though the pre-sentence report specifically says the court will have to make findings on this … In Kluger, we said at page 561, quote, Bauer, he's the broker, is explicitly an individual, quote, to whom the defendant provided inside information, unquote, citing 2B1.4 comment.

Oral argument — Lima v. Newark Police Dept

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2011

It puts plaintiffs in a very precarious position, having to decide in a ten day period whether to accept or reject the offer and then proceed to trial under some serious disabilities that the offer presents … I took that from your earlier comment, Judge.

Oral argument — Etc Combs v. Homer Center School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

DICTA is when you're commenting on some new rule of law that is not part of it. They're explaining how these rules are still valid. … Because your argument seems to be any level of discretion, period, any level of discretion constitutes a substantial burden by virtue of previous Supreme Court authority which compels you to recognize

Oral argument — Vitalis v. Sun Constructors Incetal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

Let me just read to you a couple of your comments in closing. We've proved that the excuse for the way that Mr. Vitalis was treated was simply a pretext at 845. Tools is a pretext. … They initially looked at the dates and simply determined that the EBU contract was the contract that was in effect at that time period.

Oral argument — In Re Lower Bucks Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2014

The period for filing went by. And who were these holders who gave up that pretty good claim? Looks like a pretty good claim. … The bondholder simply acts pursuant to contractual duties, and it has absolutely no obligation to do – You don't mean the bondholder. You mean the indentured trustee. I'm sorry. Yes, I misspoke.

Oral argument — Hess VDentsply International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2010

Dubs so let's start with the injunction in the Hess case that's under section 16 of the Clayton Act that act requires that the plaintiff show threatened loss or damage and in this court's opinion in Warfarin … is dental supplies conduct today they didn't do any of that they just made these arguments and so when the court went to supplement the record with evidence of injury during the period when criterion 6

Oral argument — Haviland v. Specter

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2014

You made a comment somewhat earlier. I thought that you said that you thought that the statute had passed in 06. … It's not the stipulation, it's the writ of summons that was filed within the four-year period of time. What happened on November 13, 2008, then?

Oral argument — Belmont v. MB Investment Partners,Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012

What, in fact, they have shown is over a period of three and a half years, there were a few faxes sent. … Bloom allegedly made any comments. There's no evidence that, in fact, he was on a cell phone.

Oral argument — Borden v. School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

If someone is within the confines of official duties and acting pursuant to those duties, under Garcetti, you don't need to balance anything because there's no First Amendment protection in that context … I still hang back for the last period. Who knows? Go ahead. This wasn't a tentative lead to your Honor's questions of Mr.