Documents

Oral argument — 74277) SUAREZ-SIMICH v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2004

I would like to go back to, we made this comment about the, he was having problems because of his whistleblowing activity. … the Air Force.

Oral argument — Fermin Valenzuela v. City of Anaheim

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2021

And the other thing I would say, Judge Lee, we have air chokes here. You have to assume air chokes, not carotid restraints. That is equivalent to deadly force. … The other thing on the Bain Act, there's plenty of evidence to support the finding on the Bain Act. As Reese v.

Oral argument — PEDROZA v. BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

With all due respect, Your Honor, I think there's two points that are appropriate in regard to your comments. Number one, in this case, Mr. … We're not writing on a clean slate here. Yes, it's a matter of construction, a very general statutory phrase.

Oral argument — Pedroza v. BRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2008

With all due respect, Your Honor, I think there are two points that are appropriate in regard to your comments. Okay. Number one, in this case, Mr. … We're not writing on a clean slate here. Yes, it's a matter of construction, but a very general statutory phrase.

Oral argument — Smith v. Ball

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2008

Fish and Wildlife Service as violations of the Endangered Species Act that resulted in extirpation of bull trout. … Finding a cherry picker that'll get up 50, 60 feet in the air in the Bitterroot Forest is one thing.

Oral argument — Adams v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2007

Your Honors, on the lying in wait issue, I have a few comments. First of all, I don't think it's clear that that was, in fact, the theory of first degree murder that the jury used to convict. … Chips' testimony is the only thing that establishes any period of watching and waiting for any opportunity time to act.

Oral argument — Michael Jayne v. Steve Blunk

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2012

Central to the evaluation of the illegal search that took place in this case is the Stored Communications Act. Despite the centrality of the act, the lower court essentially ignored it. … I go back to my beginning comments, which would be it would be wonderful to provide an answer to that.

Oral argument — Fong LLC v. The Hartford Fire Insurance Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2004

And I believe those, although they are Miller Act cases, are analogous to the bond at issue here. … If, in fact, Hartford wanted to comment on the duration of the work rather than the scope, they had the power to do that.

Oral argument — United States v. Claudia Bastidas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 6, 2016

I would, I believe these are not means, but two entirely separate acts with mental, different mental states. She goes from X to Y under certain circumstances. She goes from Y to X under others. … As long as at some point in the process the defendant came clean. I disagree with that characterization of the case law.

Oral argument — Kutylo v. Vaughan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2010

There's no way to really know that unless he's caught in the act. Right. But there was no record of that. So either he was not caught in the act or he was clean for 22 years. Correct, Your Honor. … And how hard is it or difficult is it in prison to be caught in the act? I mean, isn't it...

Oral argument — Indirect Purchaser v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

It's plausible that these comments, restrictions on supply, discipline, it's possible that these are code words for we have an agreement. … So the two time periods, you had excess supply in the pre-period. You had excess demand in the conspiracy period. They weren't at all comparable. What else do the plaintiffs plead?

Oral argument — World Nutrition Incorporated v. Advanced Supplementary Technologies Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2025

You're still talking about a Lanham Act case. You're still talking about building of a brand. … And that's based on that comment at the end of Jarrow? That's based primarily on Jarrow, yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Citizens Legal Enforcement and v. Robert Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

There was a period of time, I believe at least two instances in the last 25 years. … This was before the inception of NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, where we would have had innumerable agencies and state reviews and public hearings and testimony and federal register notices

Oral argument — Huynh v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. … That case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — Huynh / Nguyen v. Mukasey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2008

The Smith case basically says that petitioner's petition, which was filed June 10, 2005, was within the 30-day period of filing post Real ID Act of 2005. Right. … At that case, the BIA had made its decision in late 2005, outside of the 30-day period post real ID.

Oral argument — United States v. Limon-Robles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2006

He commented on the evidence in a very sort of clean and obvious way without having heard all the evidence. After he'd heard all the evidence, he changed his mind. … And so he, even in that comment, left the door open to saying, well, this is where we are at this point, but after I hear from the government's evidence, the outcome may be different.

Oral argument — United States v. Bryan Rusnak

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 11, 2020

There was a period of time, a fairly lengthy period of time, that the documents appeared on the computer to begin with. … So there would have to be somebody who was accessing all three computers and putting this clean-up app on it and doing it over a four-year period of time. I mean, is that basically accurate?

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

Air fresheners. Air fresheners. … But the government acted as if it was my responsibility to do it.

Oral argument — Dean Carter v. Kevin Chappell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2019

They would ask permission first, but they would say, Your Honor, may I make a comment? … had acted rationally for so many years.

Oral argument — in re: UPS "Air-In-Ground" Mktg & SPL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2013

Okay, so two comments in response to that. … As I said at the beginning, any issue that this might be misleading or deceptive, this is not a Consumer Protection Act claim.