Documents

Oral argument — Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2014

The flitch is the workpiece on which the apparatus acts. By definition, a workpiece is not a part of the apparatus, which acts on the workpiece. But without the flitch, the apparatus has no purpose. … During that period of time, there was an interference that had been provoked by Capital Machine with one of their applications in our issue patent. At the PTAB, we won that interference.

Oral argument — +RFR Industries v. Century Steps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2007

And I believe there's an argument that, given the length of the period of time, you would have contractual remedies for breaching the contract. … And in addition, you would have remedies for infringement, the infringement that occurred during that period of time. So you get what?

Oral argument — Funai Electric v. Daewood Electronics

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2009

That the patentee is in effect simply acting as the manufacturer and nothing more and that the product is the OEM's product and whether it's labeled or not is up to the OEM? … In fact, for a period of time they were wearing two hats.

Oral argument — AMS ASSOCIATES, INC. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 10, 2013

Upon which to determine whether Zeebo Afudi is eligible for a separate rate for this review period. … Denning's comment that you're asking them to use your public information to come up with that rate and yet all of that public information is unreliable? No, no.

Oral argument — Proveris Scientific v. Innovasystems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2008

They did that in connection with also enacting section 201 in Hatch-Waxman Act. 201, 202 are 156 and 271E1. … And then ultimately, just that issue with regard to Judge Young and the comments that we made on the record, even the quote that Ms.

Oral argument — BORMES v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 2, 2010

It's almost, there's a skepticism in the comment, isn't there? Oh, I didn't think so. I thought it was for dramatic effect. … Reporting Act.

Oral argument — CHARLES CHASTAIN v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2013

Of the period of 1970, there were four pieces of medical evidence in the record. … Well, with all that evidence that wasn't in the record in 1970 and isn't considered under the Pew test, how could it be that the Board of Veterans' Court was wrong in saying that this was not an act of

Oral argument — Shaw v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

It just says decision period. … I may just comment one quickly in terms of 12B— or excuse me, 13B, Rule 13B, which was discussed earlier.

Oral argument — Commonwealth Scientific v. Toshiba

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 3, 2008

ABA model rule 1.7, comment 5. We know that the Fifth Circuit does look to the ABA code. We cited the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska versus BASF in the client case. … A three-year period measured from what, the joint defense agreement?

Oral argument — SYDNOR v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2012

And I thought the response to that in that time period was that this regulation that was in place took away your 7521 rights because it was a suitability case. … Was that regulation promulgated by notice and comment rulemaking? It would have been, yes. And what was the rationale given for exempting 7521 rights when the issue of suitability?

Oral argument — Omaha Steaks International v. Greater Omaha Packing Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

One of our statutes on the Lanham Act says after a certain amount of time you acquire it. Omaha and Steaks commissioned a survey that showed we'd earned it. … But you have one other final comment and let's bring this to a close. Thank you. Thank you. We thank both sides and the case is submitted. That concludes our proceeding.

Oral argument — In Re Giacomini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

I don't have any comments this morning in particular for you, but I'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. … Stoll, at the end of the 12-month period, you can file a patent application in one of the four. But what if the balance of the provisional application is published?

Oral argument — Stupp Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2025

And they run this multiple times as they look through, whether it's regions, purchasers, time periods. … And again, a lot of those comments come from places in the academic literature where they're, again, talking about these statistical results.

Oral argument — SAS Institute, Inc. v. Complementsoft, LLC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016

I do have some comments on their appeal. I'd be happy to make, however you prefer. … When you have the limited time period for an IPR to get done, it has to be done a little bit differently.

Oral argument — CONVOLVE v. COMPAQ COMPUTER

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2013

Dunner's comment that he claims that your expert actually said that it was enabled? … The question was, did the expert key his comments on the various slides to specific trade secrets?

Oral argument — Michaels Stores, Inc v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2014

You've got to go have notice and comment rulemaking to amend the regulation. That's right. Right. But it's a total non‑starter, dog won't hunt argument if we agree with the government. … Those were both published in the Federal Register and under the Federal Register Act. And is there a statement in there that says if you don't have an individual rate, you get the countrywide rate?

Oral argument — NOVA v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2020

that, but you are right to the extent that 5104CB is unconditional in that sense in that it just says at any time, you know, in any case more than one year has passed, you may file a supplemental claim, period … No, because what it is is it's balancing act. It's a balancing act between decreasing inefficiencies and balance, making sure, you know, checking on the rights of the individual claimants.

Oral argument — Mansfield v. . DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2015

You can't even see if there's something else that I can do or another position when they've obviously put him in that position for a significant period of time. … Just briefly, Your Honor, a few things I want to comment on counsel said. Getting back to the Griffin-Liles, it's not an issue of whether an agency is compelled to put somebody in another spot.

Oral argument — ULRICH v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2013

Once there's an allegation made and it's a non-frivolous allegation, then the agency can come forward with the bona fide reasons to act. … We certainly agree with the comments of the board.

Oral argument — Scott Timber Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2007

As I understand the comments now, that's in direct contradiction to an argument that was presented in this Court in the first appeal of this instance. … There was a period of time when our client did not have timber to run through its mills. That's where the problem is, Your Honor.