Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.38s
Federal Register · Rule · May 18, 2010
EPA has determined that these SIP revisions comply with the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations, are consistent with EPA policies, and will improve air quality. … This action is being taken under section 110 and parts C and D of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA). DATES: This final rule will be effective June 17, 2010.
75 FR 27644Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 4, 2018
Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990. … The redesignation request and maintenance plan satisfy all applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act. PART 81—DESIGNATION OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES 4.
83 FR 14373Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 3, 2008
Delegation of NESHAP Section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), authorizes EPA to delegate to state or local air pollution control agencies the authority to implement and enforce the … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: March 19, 2008.
73 FR 18169Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 10, 1995
The 1990 amendments of the Clean Air Act require reformulated gasoline in the nine cities with the highest levels of ozone. … Response to Comments A comment period was set for the period of June 14 through June 28, 1995. During that period two comments were received.
60 FR 35488Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 3, 1998
The intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) according to the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 63 FR 42784.
63 FR 66758Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 1, 1999
The intended effect of finalizing this action is to regulate emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act) … Response to Public Comments A 30-day public comment period was provided in 59 FR 15686; EPA did not receive any comments. IV.
64 FR 53210Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 25, 2005
Air Act. … The Connecticut DEP submitted the Plan to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. DATES: EPA must receive written comments on this proposed rule March 28, 2005.
70 FR 9265Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa: Regional Haze
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 26, 2012
Specifically, these revisions address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA's rules that required States to prevent any future and remedy any existing anthropogenic impairment of visibility … During the public comment period we received no written comments. III.
77 FR 38006Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 9, 1996
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in l977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the Monterey … On November 15, 1990, the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
61 FR 4890Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 18, 2008
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. … Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2008.
73 FR 14389Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 2, 2015
Background Under the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”), the EPA has promulgated national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS or “standards”) for certain pervasive air pollutants. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 53001Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 7, 2002
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on March 11, 2002. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 5729Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 28, 2004
This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 77647Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2008
Air Act (CAA). … The public comment period will end at the same time as the public comment period for this proposed rule.
73 FR 42731Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 9, 2001
and EPA's requirements under the Clean Air Act (the Act) • Make New Jersey's OMET Program federally-enforceable. … Air Act.
66 FR 1796Environmental Protection AgencyRequest for Nominations for the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC) Ozone Panel
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 10, 2024
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS and recommend to … Section 109(d)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that EPA carry out a periodic review and revision, as appropriate, of the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants,
89 FR 56749Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 16, 2004
The public comment period closed on May 24, 2004. No adverse comments were received in response to the proposed rule. Additionally, Kentucky has adequately addressed EPA's requested clarifications. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 55749Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Nevada
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 20, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) for the State of Nevada to satisfy requirements of section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … All public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 50764Environmental Protection AgencyInterim Approval of Section 112(l) Delegated Authority; Washington
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 26, 1996
Background and Purpose Section 112(l) of the federal Clean Air Act (CAA) enables the EPA to approve state air toxic programs or rules to operate in place of the Federal air toxic program or rules. … As of the close of the 30 day public comment period (March 17, 1996), EPA had received comments from two parties, both of which were supportive of the proposed delegation.
61 FR 43675Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 10, 2022
ozone NAAQS because the request meets the statutory requirements for redesignation under the Clean Air Act (CAA). … “State Implementation Plan (SIP) Actions Submitted in Response to Clean Air Act (CAA) Deadlines,” Memorandum from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality Management Division, October 28, 1992; 6.
87 FR 13668Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.