Documents

Oral argument — Restricted Category v. Sturgell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

I am representing Robert Sturgill, who is currently the acting administrator of the FAA. … But more importantly, in the comments, the commenters had an opportunity to explain what the costs of the parts were. And they were.

Oral argument — Comp Store v. Compaq

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2005

He told Barron's that he needed to get involved personally in this operation, clean up the management, get things cleaned up, and get ready for a rapid move forward, start hiring people. … The – I've got two minutes left, just a couple of brief comments on the prejudgment interest.

Oral argument — James Swinnie v. Pete Geren

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2010

Over that time period, I don't believe that chart shows that some individuals received fewer hours. … Sweeney made lewd comments and engaged in sexual banter or something to that effect. That petition was signed by five or six people.

Oral argument — Lacey Sivak v. John Hardison

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2010

These are not just the occasional stray comment from the street. We haven't even talked about them. … We don't really, in court, act based on knowledge or even upon facts. We act upon evidence.

Oral argument — Protect Our Communities Fo v. AGRI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2012

, responses to their comments submitted. … No, you're actually over, but we'll give you a short period for rebuttal. Thank you. Okay. Do you have a time agreement? Yes, Your Honor, we do.

Oral argument — United States v. Juan Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Then we give him Miranda and, you know, that's a cleaning act. We can do whatever we want. But on one level, of course, they did that because he wouldn't have been there. Right. … I think there was probable cause, frankly, in the morning from the 8.30 to 9.30 period when defendant is acting as a lookout. Even at that point, there would have been probable cause. Sorry.

Oral argument — GALLAGHER v. CITY OF WEST COVINA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2005

It was 18 trial days over a two-month period, but it's still a long trial. … The trial was 18 court days and two months ongoing without any other significant comments being made or suggestion of improper evidence or comment by counsel.

Oral argument — 74277) SUAREZ-SIMICH v. ASHCROFT

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2004

I would like to go back to, we made this comment about the, he was having problems because of his whistleblowing activity. … the Air Force.

Oral argument — West Virginia Invest v. Adecco S.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2007

The problem is that, as I said, that, you know, when you get your act together, come back to us. … So here you allege it was a problem during the class period.

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Wright

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2011

Air fresheners. Air fresheners. … But the government acted as if it was my responsibility to do it.

Oral argument — Navarro-Soqui v. Holder

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2008

But the one for which your client was convicted as a 10-year period. That is correct. So that's bigger, so we can't say that that's a difference. … An act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or failed the act through ignorance, mistake, or accident.

Oral argument — Kahea v. NMFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

If it's large enough that they are discharging, discharge is large enough over 100,000 pounds of product, then they would have to get a permit, a Clean Water Act permit from EPA. … You know, the Magnuson Act doesn't – If it got big enough. If it got big enough, they would have to get a clean water permit, not from this particular defendant, but from the EPA.

Oral argument — American News and Information v. William Gore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2018

Playford videotaped a prostitution ring in McGonigal Canyon back around that time that the county and the city maintained had been cleaned up and didn't exist anymore. … I don't know if there's anything else you want me to comment on. The various other claims, I think, are addressed thoroughly in the brief.

Oral argument — Eric Shine v. USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2014

He was charged, as I understood it, with incompetence, period. Yes. I just read to you the broad definition of incompetence. … Well, first of all, there is no clean slate. I handled the case Klatt v. United States 20 years ago, again with Mr.

Oral argument — Adams v. Castro

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2007

Your Honors, on the lying in wait issue, I have a few comments. First of all, I don't think it's clear that that was, in fact, the theory of first degree murder that the jury used to convict. … Chips' testimony is the only thing that establishes any period of watching and waiting for any opportunity time to act.

Oral argument — Citizens Legal Enforcement and v. Robert Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2013

There was a period of time, I believe at least two instances in the last 25 years. … This was before the inception of NEPA, Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act, where we would have had innumerable agencies and state reviews and public hearings and testimony and federal register notices

Oral argument — Elena Mois v. Wynn Las Vegas LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2017

This Court has repeatedly said that a full airing of cases, especially indiscrimination cases, a full airing is necessary because they're so factually intense, and a full airing of it in front of the entire … That was, you're right, that was a few weeks later, but it was during the period of time that she was on her leave. On Monday morning.

Oral argument — John Kwesele v. King County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2020

He's like an air traffic controller on the ground, and there seemed to be a lot of difficulties in his ability to navigate those situations. Now, Mr. … Queselli's probationary period would have ended in February of 2014 had it not been extended.

Oral argument — Shannon Adamson v. Port of Bellingham

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2018

Well, if you're the landlord and you have an air conditioning system, you might tell the tenant, don't screw up my air conditioning system in the apartment, and here's the operating manual. … And I will close finally, if I may, with one comment. Judge Gould, you asked about how much would it have cost to fix this. I know we have a bad fact.

Oral argument — Indirect Purchaser v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2021

It's plausible that these comments, restrictions on supply, discipline, it's possible that these are code words for we have an agreement. … So the two time periods, you had excess supply in the pre-period. You had excess demand in the conspiracy period. They weren't at all comparable. What else do the plaintiffs plead?