Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
949 results
0.10s
Oral argument — Columbia Gas Transmission v. Lambert Boyce, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017
Yes, and the reality is that the temporary take, the construction period is actually only like two, three weeks. … Before I begin my more prepared comments, I would like to address Your Honor's questions to my opponent.
52 min of audioOral argument — William Lyons v. PNC Bank, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2024
For example until the 2009 rulemaking so for many decades the same regulations governed account opening and periodic statement disclosures for both credit cards accessing unsecured and home There are other … Are you going to comment on the RESPA claim? I'm happy to if you would like. I would like to hear your viewpoint. It sounds like you didn't have any qualms with the district courts decision on RESPA.
68 min of audioOral argument — Geri-Care Pharmaceuticals Corporation v. Stradis Healthcare, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025
Jerry Care identified itself as the labeler of the eyewash to the FDA when it registered it, pursuant to the Drug Listing Act of 1972. … They did some, they testified as to doing some periodic testing of product that they received.
47 min of audioOral argument — Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald Trump
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2020
And then lastly, it added, again, in commenting on Mandel, when it comes to collecting evidence and drawing emphasis on questions of national security, the lack of competence on the part of the courts … Period. Right. But under these circumstances. Nothing in condition. That is a component. That finding is a component for them later to apply the preliminary injunction standard.
38 min of audioOral argument — John Wood v. Bryan Stirling
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2021
They deliberated over a three-day period. They received an Allen charge from the mental health testimony. So Ms. … Wood acted during all of the offenses and all of the danger and the injury that he inflicted, all of that came in. And we see in the PCR court's order how he went back and looked at that.
42 min of audioOral argument — Felicia Dean v. Stephen McKinney
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2020
And Judge Kaine, in his oral, specifically said, and I will reference his comments, without an analysis of what the status of the law at the time, he said, the Fourth Circuit has not adjudicated the lawfulness … But that's why South Carolina has a Tort Claims Act. And that has been addressed under the South Carolina Tort Claims Act.
50 min of audioOral argument — Bayer CropScience LP v. Albemarle Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2017
While Alomar was increasing its price to Bayer from $1.85 to $4.09 to $11.04 over the course of 12 months, Chemtura, the sole producer, was selling to Bayer for less than $2.50 a pound the entire period … I think arguably there could be a circumstance where all the lies could be irrelevant in the circumstances potentially of what the UCC in comment three calls the normal case where what was happening, and
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Runyon
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2020
And those are statutory circumstances under the Federal Death Penalty Act. … of... acting in furtherance, does it?
66 min of audioOral argument — Nicholas Lennear v. Eric Wilson
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2019
You made the comment earlier on that the video would have shown that he didn't incite. And I'm not trying to quote you, but something to the effect that the video would have shown it. … Case Manager Lemos alleged that he screamed to other witnesses, that he acted aggressively, that other witnesses were demonstrating in return.
45 min of audioOral argument — James Bryant, III v. Michael Stephan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2021
Periodically through that trial, the judge is asking her, ma'am, are you catching everything? She's saying, yes, ma'am, I am. The judge followed up with the result. … It has those comments, but what is not spoken is there were numerous times where the judge and juror 342 communicated extensively.
67 min of audioOral argument — Sally Tarquinio v. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2025
She made a comment about it in her deposition, but no lawyer ever brought that point to the attention of the district court. Do you agree with that? I don't have an answer for you. … It also temporarily accommodated her for a period of time while it considered the request. Dr.
42 min of audioOral argument — Randy Richardson v. Prince George's County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2025
But what all I'm suggesting is I don't understand why the state courts, who have the same duty that Judge Wynn rightly alluded to, of making certain to, you know, acting in the interest of the public and … I just want to start, Judge Wilkinson, with a comment that you made. Everything being discussed here today, everything that Judge Wynn has raised is in the factual record in the complaint.
49 min of audioOral argument — Aldo De Leon Resendiz v. Exxon Mobil Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2022
During his period of time as a he was recruited by the defendant Exxon Mobil to apply for an internship, a limited term internship of about three months in duration. He did that. … and immigration first of all the whole notion of work authorization did not exist prior to irka prior to irka there was no such thing it is entirely tied to alienage and immigration reform and control act
48 min of audioOral argument — South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. Ellen Weaver
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026
That's a facial challenge, but when you go and look at affidavits and documents and depositions and conflicting affidavits, so long as it's not a merits act, the district court can resolve all those facts … Before I want to move on and mention a few other things and respond to a few other questions, but one final comment.
45 min of audioOral argument — Sage Blair v. Appomattox County School Board
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025
Over a two-week period, after which time the student ran away and obviously suffered very horrific events, but that's not the fault of the school board. … You talk about the counselor, and acted with deliberate indifference. Yes. There was severe . . . that's what you allege.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ralph Jackson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2013
Leidy, this court has said in order to be punished to a death sentence, the government needs to show that a defendant acted with intent. … I mean, you know, that would undermine every guilty plea, that same comment. Well, no, Your Honor. I think that making the decision to plead guilty has to be a counseled one.
51 min of audioOral argument — Maximino Ramos v. Todd Blanche
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2026
We haven't raised any argument related to a specific mens rea or materiality, but I think at a minimum, it requires an act of misrepresentation. … But deceit has an act or practice of deceiving with a falsification, a concealment, or cheating. And so either one of those suffices to me...
48 min of audioOral argument — Garfield Holley v. J. Combs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2025
Holley's case without prejudice under the three strikes rule of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, finding that Mr. … So we have a two-year period and this... Sorry, not the year, but before or after the district court ruled on the initial motion?
43 min of audioOral argument — United States ex rel Kurt Bunk v. Gosselin World Wide Moving, N.
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2013
You're adding a lot of editorial comment, which I'll let you do that in a little bit. You just told me it had to be zero. Now you're telling me there's an alternative. … In the Cartwright bid rigging case, which involved a portion of shipments in one country for a six-month period, some of the defendants here were fined $6 million.
66 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Hamza Kolsuz
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2017
all kinds of places and in all kinds of dangerous ways, we, at this time, are going to throw up obstacles to border searches and give people more advanced means of committing what are very dangerous acts … You know, I've heard this whole discussion has concerned your comments and that of your colleagues, have concerned the privacy interests at stake in this case.
80 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.