Documents

Oral argument — Guadalupe v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2021

So I need you guys to both listen up for judges' comments, okay? A lot of the time in these telephonic hearings, a judge will start asking a question and counsel won't hear it. … And section 3.6, that regulation speaks to when there can be a qualifying disability from inactive duty for training or in act dutra.

Oral argument — Sud-Chemie v. Multisorb Tech

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2008

As you I think commented. But this is the prior arc that doesn't work as well because it seals at 2.77 as opposed to 10.21. … A person of ordinary skill in the art here would be able to tell very easily the softening points of the materials, and he could pick materials that would act in a predictable way.

Oral argument — Osenbach v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2025

This case involves an injury that occurred under the National Vaccine Compensation Act. And this act was enacted by Congress to award damages that can occur from vaccines. … The special master did not comment on this evidence in the least bit, and failed to address it.

Oral argument — MOTIVA v. ITC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2013

We would be willing to receive the comments of all involved on the applicability of that case. If it can lay this to rest, it will simplify things. … If we expand that, it's a little scary to think how confusing it might be to the public to understand and appreciate what time period is irrelevant, right?

Oral argument — U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2020

And I think that's correct, that for a period of time, that the dissolved corporation can both sue and be sued. … It's capacity to sue, capacity to continue to act. And under state law, dogs does have the capacity to sue and be sued. For a period of time, it can still be sued by creditors. That is the state law.

Oral argument — Freight Tracking Technologies v. Virginia International

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2016

And, of course, in claim construction, that can be proper if you have a case where the patentee acted as his or her own lexicographer. But no one claims that's the case here. … There was perhaps some comment from the bench, some skepticism as to how this works, and we point out that page 43 of our opening brief, we quote the now folks, the IT folks, when describing their product

Oral argument — Conocophillips v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

I mean, we can't just have an illegality in the air with no impact on the contract. I think the standard LaBarge announces, is there a causal effect? Has it somehow diminished the contract price? … I principally want to comment about the state of the record on the PNM. Much of what the government talked about is the distinctions between plaques and PNM.

Oral argument — Mondis Technology Ltd. v. LG Electronics Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2021

If there were a conflict, you would have a problem under the Rules Enabling Act, and the statute would have to supersede the rule, but we don't have to get there. … So we submit that on the timeliness point that the appeal is not timely, that 1292C2 states the beginning of the appeal period, that the 30-day rule of 2107 states the end of the appeal period, and that

Oral argument — Valeo North America, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2025

For example, parties never had any comment to make comment on the particular issue, because it's information that is not expressly incorporated into the determination itself. … There was a period when that was very, very prevalent.

Oral argument — Solis v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2017

Congress mandated in the Anti-Border Protection Act that all applicants for law enforcement positions with the Customs and Border Patrol Agency be polygraphed as part of their background investigation. … Yes, a couple of thoughts in answer to your comments, Judge. One, we don't – we can't challenge the regulation. We don't have the authority.

Oral argument — CP Kelco US, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2019

And all throughout our comments on the briefing and all the remand comments, we have whole headings devoted to begging commerce to do the right thing and either translate it itself or let us do so. … And so, with the bacterial strain that we have here, it's a strain that the right to And that was prior to the period of review.

Oral argument — Anderson v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2018

And that period of approximately January 28th would be about five weeks after the immunization. … However, his expert testimony was contradicted, virtually inconsistent with his published articles, which the special master did not comment upon.

Oral argument — Capital Machine Company v. Miller Veneers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2014

The flitch is the workpiece on which the apparatus acts. By definition, a workpiece is not a part of the apparatus, which acts on the workpiece. But without the flitch, the apparatus has no purpose. … During that period of time, there was an interference that had been provoked by Capital Machine with one of their applications in our issue patent. At the PTAB, we won that interference.

Oral argument — Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2016

, but having release of the drug for an extended period? … This is exactly the evidence that Judge Stein considered, carefully commented on. This was a ruling, a judgment that the rulings went both ways in the case.

Oral argument — Rothe Development v. Defense

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2010

Well, except right at the end where he made the comment that they didn't fight this and by cert was that it was going to go away in six months. … They keep just pushing ahead in a case that was unreasonably prosecuted for a period of 10 years. Mr. Barton, what would your answer be to Judge Bryson's earlier question?

Oral argument — Shaw v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2010

It just says decision period. … I may just comment one quickly in terms of 12B— or excuse me, 13B, Rule 13B, which was discussed earlier.

Oral argument — In Re Tam

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2015

I think when the government yes when the government issues the registration that act is a governmental act and is an expressive act saying that this is a mark that's eligible under the criteria Congress … Period. That's what Section 2A does. That is what Section 2A is meant to do by its very terms.

Oral argument — CHARLES CHASTAIN v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2013

Of the period of 1970, there were four pieces of medical evidence in the record. … Well, with all that evidence that wasn't in the record in 1970 and isn't considered under the Pew test, how could it be that the Board of Veterans' Court was wrong in saying that this was not an act of

Oral argument — Depena v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2018

I appreciated your comment and your question, Judge Hughes, because the legal question here is whether or not the special master erred. … I just want to touch on a couple of comments.

Oral argument — In Re Giacomini

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010

I don't have any comments this morning in particular for you, but I'd be happy to address any questions that you might have. … Stoll, at the end of the 12-month period, you can file a patent application in one of the four. But what if the balance of the provisional application is published?