Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
2,676 results
0.07s
Oral argument — McDonald v. State of Illinois Department of Human Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2010
What about the 60-month look-back period? Apparently that's been changed. Can a state still have a shorter look-back period? Well, the state still uses 36 months. There are no rules in place. … Let's fix them and let's do them in accordance with the Administrative Review Act.
37 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lindsey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2012
But didn't in those other cases, even the states, there was, the, the state then even commented on the evidence at some point later. … But within the, in the air of other evidence, I mean, a witness said they saw, I believe it was the defendant with the gun in his hand leaving the store.
16 min of audioOral argument — Village of Villa Park v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2013
Deputy chief testified that he had noticed him limping for a period of time from January all the way through, I believe, April. Okay. … Butig testified on numerous occasions during the period from January 13th, 2007, to April 5th, 2007. He observed a claimant walking with a limp.
20 min of audioOral argument — Link Company Group v. Chicago Title Land Trust Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 30, 2018
There's been many instances of Mechanics liens stemming from oral contracts And the law certainly provides for it In fact In the Apollo case You knew what was going to go We're going to pay for this air … As an agent of Link Company Group He says on no fewer than nine specifications That he had a deal With his father-in-law That his father-in-law Would buy a house They would live in it Rent-free for a period
36 min of audioOral argument — Griggs v. Griggs
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2012
The parties were divorced in 1975, at which time the husband was on active duty in the United States Air Force making approximately $2,700 a month. … Smith was timely appealed after the divorce, and it was also within the timeframe of consideration of the passage of the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act, which did create a time period
30 min of audioOral argument — In re Estate of Hoogerwerf
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012
We know from the record he's had a consulting arrangement and an agreement in place since 1997 that allows him to act as an agent for the company. … So now, if they go away, both of them go away, one has, one's hanging in the air. What are you going to do? Again, Rule 206 requires us to have a corporate representative.
46 min of audioOral argument — CEAI Elmhurst Terrace, LLC v. Sanders
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023
As you can see from his authorities, he cites federal housing acts, the Illinois Whistleblower Act, solicitation of murder or criminal statute. … Look no further again than his final comments when he filed his motion to vacate in the hearing on April 11th. I want to leave the promises. In Mr.
18 min of audioOral argument — In Matter of Z.J.F.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2013
And he would be incarcerated for a period in excess of two years after the filing of the petition. … Yeah, he's going to clean up in prison. But, you know, a drug problem just doesn't go away.
38 min of audioOral argument — Brazeau v. Maus
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 13, 2018
And the act of actually seizing that property in the initial writ was the act of getting jurisdiction. There's cases that I, the case that I cite to that point is Universal Credit v. … Now, procedurally, we need to clean up a few things here.
38 min of audioOral argument — U.S. Bank v. Moran
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2019
And so I believe it was air for the Court to deny the motion for a directed verdict at the close of all evidence. … It wasn't an emotional comment, as Judge Shenasol found.
36 min of audioOral argument — In re Guardianship of Kusmanoff
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2017
Jurisdiction is based on the Adult or the Uniform Adult Proceeding and Protection Act. I'm just going to refer to it as the Act. The Uniform Act? What? The Uniform Act. … And under 735 ILCS 5-2-110, if the defendant presented evidence after his motion for direct defiance, he waived that claim that the trial court aired. So, either Mr.
69 min of audioOral argument — Druse v. Schurman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2019
But he was given credit for the amount he paid as child support for the period of time after we filed the motion to modify. But not credit for any overpayment. … And the very first issue is whether the court ordered when it... aired when it ordered the respondent to pay the Petitioner's attorney fee. My question to you is, was this a sanction?
45 min of audioOral argument — Klimek v. Froman
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 19, 2010
As a matter of law, it only lasts for a limited duration, the period of time that the developer owns the properties. … Do you wish to make any comments on the sanctions? I do not wish to make any comments on the sanctions that did not involve my clients. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Vasconcellos. Good morning.
41 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Leifke
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2025
I do clean out my coffee pot. I was talking about vinegar. I think we're talking about holiday recipes. I just sent a chat. He was awesome. Yeah, it's. Yeah, they turned off. Okay, okay. … And in the Shen versus Shen case, there's a nice comment, and this is referring to the maintenance payor in that case, who sought a modification of maintenance because his income had been reduced at his
42 min of audioOral argument — City of Wheaton v. Morningside Wheaton, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2018
Once you take out the words, paid by the developer, and there's no argument here that the city attorney struck those as an act beyond his legal authority. … The comment was made that the city still doesn't know what's in this contract and still doesn't have the contract. Let's be clear on this also.
42 min of audioOral argument — Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 15, 2014
But there are these impingement syndrome diagnoses, and he goes in and cleans the shoulder. So that's why, whenever I depose Dr. Wright, I ask the questions in both fashions. … I would submit that's not exactly an aggravation under the Act. And even then, he gets better after July 27, 2009. How would you define an aggravation under the Act?
28 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of Marks
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2010
Then there were air tickets for Bill and Todd. So the majority of that is tuition as tuition, which was his obligation. I'm not saying it's not his obligation. … In addition, you'll note in Judge Marthein's opinion that she chooses to comment on his testimony about his lack of income from his corporation.
61 min of audioOral argument — People v. Zeas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2020
She's not acting seductively. She's not disrobing. She's not acting in any other sexual manner. … sex act, as long as it's a lewd act itself.
31 min of audioOral argument — In re Marriage of McDonald
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2019
Judge Rosenbaum mentioned the spill tea, taking the train lift off of the bike, being silly in a drive-thru, lack of air conditioning. … As parents, you're not supposed to comment on dad's behavior. You're supposed to have somebody independent do that. Who other than Dr. Osgood is supposed to do that? She's an independent expert.
32 min of audioOral argument — United National Insurance. v. Faure Brothers Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2011
The warehouse worker, as air products charged, was careless and negligent in making this mistake here. And the underlying complaint never alleged that this was intentional or non- or intentional. … The courts have looked to the consequences, not the mental state of the act.
22 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.