Documents

Oral argument — 21-204421-2174United States of America v. Donnie SmithAbid StevensMaurice Quinn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

And that's why the trial judge gave me the justification in defense of others because of the fact that my client's wife was in the store for a brief period of time. … Of course, the Third Circuit was in the position of evaluating the judge's comments, looks to the legislative history.

Oral argument — Smith&Wesson Brands v. Atty Gen State of N J

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2021

I want to just sort of touch on this wrongful act idea that we've heard a lot about. … That's not a wrongful act. But I thought Ms. Kai's argument was that these are grave matters.

Oral argument — Pllumiv.Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2011

Under the amendment added by the Real ID Act of 2005. In this case, there are legal questions that that are raised by the board's decision. … You're saying humanitarian parole is for a limited period of time, whereas asylum is asylum.

Oral argument — Singerv.Milgram

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2009

The TRO was an extended TRO, and it was purposely, as Judge Debevoise commented at the close of the preliminary injunction hearing, it was specifically addressed to run through the entire show at the Hilton … Yes, the State Attorney General was required to stand down and the Hilton Hotel was given what was called a safe harbor period to go back to its former advertising.

Oral argument — In Re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation No VI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2016

But I want to go through some of those comments. First, the language that he's talking about in Exhibit Q is just this plain. … That was in a time period where the MDL was being created. These events were happening in 1990 and 1991.

Oral argument — United States v. Kulick

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2010

Smith can comment, the government doesn't dispute that. I don't think so. I don't think so. I think we both agree that one should look at an A2 analysis. … There was no continuity of possession and there was no similarity between the acts and no pattern of such acts.

Oral argument — Yuspov v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Rudnick a hard time in light of his brief, which stated, I want you to comment on this. He said, I want you to comment on that. Your Honor, I disagree that that is the standard. … We did some amendments under the Refugee Act of 80, and then it was amended again in 1996. There's a balancing act.

Oral argument — United States v. Turner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2013

In other words, the assertion of the government seems to be, look, the mandatory act is the one that applies and so what if the judge said the wrong act, since the mandatory act applies, just apply it. … The defendant was in India for, I think, a 14-year period. So there were difficulties in terms of this was the best evidence that was available. I see that my time has expired.

Oral argument — Susinno v. Work Out World Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2017

Sassino in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. … And it said that for a violation of the do-not-call regulations, you have to show that you received two or more of these calls within a 12-month period.

Oral argument — Lambertv.Beard Rehearing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2013

Unlike the homicide detectives who acted upon that statement. … Because the comments here were well short of the comments in Caldwell, Your Honor. The judge did not go out of his way to try to diminish the jury's sense of responsibility.

Oral argument — Bulato v. v. Attorney General USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 23, 2013

And yet during that period of time, as Judge Ambrose, you explicated here, he went back and forth any number of times. … And it said that that is a new provision found in the REAL ID Act.

Oral argument — Wang v. University of Pittsburgh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2026

Could one infer that his comments about from his point of view the troubling requirements of the accreditor is a about any entity including his employer who had to subscribe to them? … My name is Mike Barry and I represent Wiley periodicals. I would like to start with the point you raised first off. This is an academic dispute that centers on scholarship and scientific validity.

Oral argument — United States v. Henderson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2023

Or where it's an omission to act by a person with a duty to act. … act, being the parent.

Oral argument — Brooks v. Admin New Jersey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2018

So if we start with the first reference, which is in the opening statement, the assistant prosecutor's comment, that Wimbush was questioned and he gave a statement, then he died and the case went cold. … So what happened during that period of time? Assume you can say something, okay? Assume you can say something, Ms. Rapine.

Oral argument — In Re JARBarge Lines LP,etal

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 16, 2010

The Longshoremen and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act and the Jones Act are expressly mutually exclusive because the Longshore Act excludes in its definition of uncovered employees the members of the crew … You say, and in response to Judge Berry's comment, if I understood you correctly, you're saying, well, people don't know how to act.

Oral argument — Doe v. University Of The Sciences

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2020

wants to act, and act consistent with the preferences for outcomes that the university might have. … And the first sentence says a complainant is an individual who is eligible to file a complaint to report a violation of the policy period.

Oral argument — United States v. Tidwell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2007

But, again, we're now in the post-Booker period. The sentencing court would have much more discretion. This person, in the government's view, deserves a life sentence. … We're talking about the Anti-Drug Abuse Act that was all passed in its various parts in the space of a few years, and it's very clear what Congress's intent was throughout.

Oral argument — Goldenstein v. Repossessors,Inc,et.al

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 21, 2015

Congress defined collect in a related context very broadly, and when we have made comments in passing, if not a holding, as to the collection of cash not being strictly necessary for collection, we were … He had made absolutely no payment for that time period. He had paid only $400. At that point, he was in default.

Oral argument — Devon Drive v. Parke Bancorp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2019

During that 15-month period, Park Bank and Mr. … But they have not pled any action by the FDIC in reliance upon these alleged predicate acts.

Oral argument — United States v. Grier,III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

Well, the Commission talks about this emergency amendment, continues the Commission's work in the area of departures in Section 401M of the Prosecutorial Remedies and Other Tools and so forth, Protect Act … And my position is she did, but even if she didn't, there's nothing to suggest that the sentence would be any different, would this matter be sent back to Judge Kane, because all of her comments and her