Documents

Oral argument — Edwards v. Guardian Life Ins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 1, 2025

Second, Your Honor, in order to dismiss this case, she had to find also that the insurance policy had been validly canceled, and I'd like to comment on what the law is on cancellation. … And as our brief sets out, the process by which we would cancel one-life policies is we would wait until the renewal period, three months before the renewal period.

Oral argument — Richard Winfrey, Jr. v. San Jacinto County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2017

Well, it would go beyond that period, because in Manuel v. … I would just point out, too, I mean, this is a friendly comment to you and one that Ms.

Oral argument — David Melasky v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

I may be missing something here, but you, of course, are addressing, it seems so far all you've done is address the personal payment plan in your comments. Am I missing something? … And it certainly didn't happen within the time period that was prescribed.

Oral argument — ID 100218776 v. BP Exploration & Prodn, I

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2017

You were not required, it says, any time during this two-year period. So the point was, if you were a new business during – and started up 10 months into the period, you still satisfied it. … Would you comment on counsel's example where he says that Section 1.2.3 would be a vessel under one of the other sections? It's not, Your Honor. And here's why.

Oral argument — Gibson Brands v. Armadillo Distr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2024

The fact that something is generic for a long period of time, a preceding period of time, is at least suggestive that it continues to be generic, absent some dramatic change. … There's also this comment about knockoffs and that's a denigration of so many different guitar companies just because they use a similar shape. That's not how this works.

Oral argument — Owner-Operator Indep Drivers v. U.S. Dept o

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2017

When a petition for reconsideration is filed, then the 60-day period for appealing the original order is told, and it is the original order denying the protest that is Let me — let's move on to the merits … That was done through notice and comment, and then the petition for review of that final setup that was published in the Federal Register, they petitioned for review of that.

Oral argument — Calvin Cannady v. Clay County Mississippi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2019

Calvin Canady's 14th Amendment due process right to not be held for an extended period without further process was clearly established in 2013 by the United States Supreme Court's decision of Anderson … Clyde and indicates you know him as his attorney uh throughout and so he was represented throughout not commenting on how well represented but he was represented and had an opportunity. Mr.

Oral argument — In re: Naoise Ryan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 25, 2023

May it please the Court, Jeff Hilberg here on behalf of Lott Polish Air. … But they did talk a lot about the Speedy Trial Act. And think about what's different between the Speedy Trial Act and the CDRA.

Oral argument — Donald Mitchell v. Weyerhaeuser Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2014

The FMLA, the Equal Pay Act case that they cite, those are different statutes. It's not a Title 7 based statute. … They did for a period of time. But they made improvements in it, especially after Mr. Story spoke to them. Did the record show when this problem with that crew started?

Oral argument — Ashraf Mahmoud v. De Moss Owners Assn, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2017

, Property Code, as amended by this Act. … The delay ensuing after a limitations period heightens the probability that the debtor will no longer have personal records.

Oral argument — Carmon Zaunbrecher v. Jeffrey Wiley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2015

It has to be a culpable conduct which rises to the level of a purposeful, deliberate act. And we simply do not have that here. … And there was a comment on . . . they actually said the dissent . . . this is . . . they basically commented on the evidence.

Oral argument — Dondero v. Highland Captl Mgmt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2023

Ellington throughout the period leading up to the TRO about the matters covered by the shared services agreement. … Dondero to communicate with a debtor in possessions in-house counsel to act against the debtor? I say that that's just outrageous, to be honest with you.

Oral argument — Heather Trautman v. Time Warner Cable Texas, L.L.C

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

190 other hours, and this is during a three-month period. 21 were full-day absences. Ms. Troutman missed the entire month of February, at least almost entirely. This case, at least in Ms. … There's also no evidence of derogatory comments, no changing reasons. Given that context, in addition to the 190 other hours, we believe this Court can properly affirm the district court decision.

Oral argument — Avalon Place Trinity v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2019

And she said, made comments, as did the board when the case went to them, that Dr. … The respondent respectfully requests that this Court affirm the Secretary's decision, which determined, in pertinent part, that the facility did not act in substantial compliance with federal regulations

Oral argument — Afshani v. Spirit SPE Portfolio 2006-1

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2021

In fact, I think their time period was even broader than is alleged in our complaint. … He says that they took active steps to conceal that information, and beyond that contractual provision, I did not see any single affirmative act that Mr.

Oral argument — Sanchez v. Smart Fabricators of TX

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2021

Act. … Sanchez working on a number of vessels over an extended period of time.

Oral argument — United States v. Pavel Burgos-Coronado

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2020

Roberts, say that the officers ought to have the authority to act on a hunch if it falls short of reasonable suspicion. … Davis for not commenting on what's behind you. I don't see anything behind you. Thank you. We are. We are adjourned under the usual order, whatever that is.

Oral argument — SGIC Strategic Global Invst v. Burger King

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 1, 2016

I think there's a question that the district court aired when it denied our motion for leave to amend under this court's precedent amendment must be freely given we asked to amend not only to further refine … There's no evidence that we didn't act as soon as we could there's no evidence of delay there's no evidence as they argued in the district court the amendment would be futile and we didn't know when the

Oral argument — Poincon v. Offshr Mrne Contractors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2021

And just with classic symptoms of radicular pain going into her arm, she told her neurologist the same thing that she was hurting over this entire period. … The district court also commented about the distinction between an aggravation and an injury.

Oral argument — Acdmy of Allergy v. LA Health Service

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2025

And the second thing is that Highmark, after a period of blocking all refusal to deal, then adopted the kind of 60 approach that Texas did. … But this is a classic example of a failed business model coming to the court under the rubric of the Sherman Act. And with that, I will yield to my colleagues. Thank you. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Drew.