Documents

Oral argument — International Custom Products v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2016

We appealed the other main issue in the case, which was the legal question as to whether the statute required customs to follow the notice and comment procedures, whether this was in fact a revocation … Well, in this case, the government acted as if the only thing that matters is the use of the import.

Oral argument — Nilssen v. Osram Sylvania

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2007

So one thing I want to go back to was your comment that I was trimming my sails. I think that there's at least four basic- I said pulling in your horns. Whatever. They're a metaphor, I'm sure. … And he acted in accordance with that for a period of five years. And there's absolutely no evidence in the record to suggest that that wasn't what happened. You're under rebuttal.

Oral argument — Burden v. USPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2006

almost perfect attendance record, several letters of appreciation concerning his performance during that stint, and also accreditation for not having any accident as a high-low driver within a five-year period … I think her response to, or her comment that the desk was in good condition was in response to the question was, was it pristine condition? She said it was in good condition.

Oral argument — Hanley Industries, Inc. v. Army

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 6, 2016

It did come up with certain comments about the foundries your Honor recognizes, but that was only in the final decision. … Some people think that if you get a ruptured tube, you've got to stop production for a long period of time in order to determine exactly what's going on, and that's true to a point.

Oral argument — Hampton v. McDonough

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

with the claim, which was pending at the beginning of the appeal period. … The re-raised comment was raised in connection with the bifurcation point? Well, I believe it goes to both points. You believe? That's not good enough. Okay, I understand.

Oral argument — BYWATERS v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2011

Only 20% of the fees were incurred during that period of time when the parties were jointly supervising. We can absolutely agree that that took too long. … URA cases, and particularly the Tucker Act cases and the Federalist cases, are highly complex. They call for very specialized skills.

Oral argument — RES-CARE, INC. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013

No, because it is purely statistical information over a period of time from 2002 to 2010, which doesn't even include the time period we're looking at now. … This comment about not having business as usual certainly doesn't imply that small businesses can't have a competition purely among themselves. I'm sorry. I do have one last question.

Oral argument — TeleSign Corporation v. Twilio, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2020

It's difficult for me to comment as to whether that would be an abstract idea as much as what would be done with that. What would be a next step? … You're actually integrating those reports, and that was a specific comment about integrating the reports into a hierarchical monitor.

Oral argument — +Kaiyuan Group v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2006

It was communicated pursuant to customs instructions at the end of the verification period. And then this was, Commerce, excuse me, missed the fact that the correction had been made. … I'll limit my comments to the wax issue, which, as we heard, came up. The argument seemed to wax and wane. I want to erase that from the record.

Oral argument — A G Design v. Trainman Lantern

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2008

I don't believe that we will have any problem on that issue because we're far past the 90-day period. Under anyone's view? Under anyone's view, even under a plaintiff's view. We're past that period. … And I've read your comments concerning the view of that being very narrow. I've also read Judge Post's recent decision that speaks directly to that issue.

Oral argument — Torres v. Justice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 5, 2009

So you're saying that there's a problem because he was charged with an illegal act, but he didn't have the intent. Correct, correct. … And during this period of time, he received a performance evaluation, which can be found on page 185 and 186 of the appendix.

Oral argument — Apotex v. Sanofi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2006

And also, as we pointed out in our reply brief, Your Honor, this is, we are the first filer under the Hatch-Waxman Act. … They said the FDA position should be one period of priority for every drug, not one for every patent. And they lost that issue. So in fact, they have two 180-day bases for priority in this case.

Oral argument — Phillips/May Corporation v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2008

This is much later in time than the Contract Disputes Act was passed. Let me proceed. I'm not doing any good with this. I think the Contract Disputes Act controls this matter. … Now, grace you to comment, sir. Let's say that you use facts A, B, and C and go to the board. Okay.

Oral argument — TQ Delta, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2019

So why do you act as though the PTO made this decision based on a conclusory statement by the expert when they actually had the reference in front of them, and the reference has language in it that arguably … So you think that parenthesed comment made for the first time in their appellate response should have clued us in that you were suggesting those arguments should be deemed by this court to be waived as

Oral argument — Kirby v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2021

That was, I think he commented, that was certainly the flavor of how he addressed that. There are no records here that directly contradict her testimony. … This appeal involves two separate statutory requirements under the Vaccine Act.

Oral argument — Knox v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2024

There were 1,386 special agents considered promotion to a GS-13 serving the three-year period. Of those, 1,366 were promoted. … What is the time period, like from when somebody puts in for, like how far in advance of February?

Oral argument — Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2015

The second is, there is a design-around period that's not contested that is easily achievable. … I think that was my comment. Your Honor, let me try to summarize our position this way.

Oral argument — Bumgardner v. Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

And I appreciate the eloquence comment, your Honor, but the problem is, at what point does this rise to a due process violation? … Even in the Appeals Modernization Act, it says, hey, we want to make this easy, easy on the veteran to do, and instead it seems like, and I'm not being critical here, it just seems like that Congress,

Oral argument — In Re Modern Woodmen of America

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2017

So, for example, if in the period of five years you stopped use of the mark for two weeks, that's still substantially continuous. Well, exclusive is what I was pointing to. … But here, they're acting in an appellate role, right? They're acting as an appellate role, but the examiner is really...

Oral argument — Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2014

We alleged that the government acted arbitrarily, capriciously, and abused their discretion. … It's best to let the judge finish his question and comment before you pounce on him. Thank you.