Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.57s
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 31, 1998
All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
63 FR 72193Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 7, 1998
This section sets forth the applicable State implementation plan for Delaware under section 110 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7410, and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality standards. … This section sets forth the applicable State implementation plan for the District of Columbia under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401) and 40 CFR part 51 to meet national ambient air quality
63 FR 67407Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; OR; Oakridge PM10 Redesignation to Attainment and Maintenance Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2022
The public comment period closed on June 8, 2022. We received no public comments, therefore, we are finalizing the action as proposed. II. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
87 FR 51265Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 28, 2013
Statutory and Executive Order Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 38872Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 23, 1998
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Statutory Authority The statutory authority for this action is provided by sections 246 and 301 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
63 FR 20159Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 7, 2002
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (the Act). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 6, 2002. … Air Act.
67 FR 62427Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 29, 2011
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to determine pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA), that the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina, ozone nonattainment area (hereafter referred to as “ … This review addresses air quality data collected in the 3-year period from 2008-2010, which is the period that EPA must consider for areas with an applicable attainment date of June 15, 2011.
76 FR 81901Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 21, 2004
In accordance with the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are proposing action on a local rule that regulates these emission sources. … Air Act.
69 FR 34323Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 23, 2026
As a consequence of this action, the Phoenix-Mesa area is not subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements pertaining to reclassification upon failure to attain and remains classified as a Moderate … On September 24, 2025, the Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) submitted to the EPA for review the “MAG 2025 Clean Air Act Section 179B(b) Retrospective Demonstration of the Impact of International
91 FR 13777Environmental Protection AgencyAppendix — EMCON/OWT, Inc. v. Chao (No. 07-198)
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 2007
The excavation was vacated for a period of time so that the natural air movement at the work area could air-out, or ventilate, the excavation. … The excavation was vacated for a period of time so that the natural air movement at the work area could air-out, or ventilate, the excavation. Ai this time a competent person did 3.
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 26, 2015
EPA has evaluated the SIP revisions for New Mexico and determined these revisions are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
80 FR 3883Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 14, 2021
APA Administrative Procedure Act AQS Air Quality System CAA Clean Air Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations DC District of Columbia DRR Data Requirements Rule E.O. … The EPA did not receive any other comments regarding the Outagamie County, Wisconsin area during the 30-day public comment period. VI.
86 FR 19576Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Illinois
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 12, 2001
We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA does not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 64146Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Hamilton County, TN
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 18, 1997
Air Act). … Clean Air Act as Amended in 1990 EPA has reviewed the requests for revision of the Federally- approved Tennessee SIP described in this notice to ensure conformance with the provisions of the Clean
62 FR 7160Environmental Protection AgencyConference on Air Quality Modeling
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 28, 1995
Such a conference is required by Section 320 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to be held every 3 years. … 1977-1988, the First, Second and Third Conferences on Air Quality Modeling were held as required by Section 320 of the Clean Air Act to help standardize modeling procedures.
60 FR 33411Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 22, 1998
The intended effect of this action is to approve revisions to COMAR 26.11.13 into the Maryland SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on [[Page 70669]] such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). F.
63 FR 70667Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 14, 2015
EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. … Early, Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2015-17063 Filed 7-13-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
80 FR 40955Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 17, 2011
This action is being taken under section 110 and part D of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 18, 2011. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
76 FR 14602Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Nov 17, 2005
Oxidants , required under sections 108 and 109 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for use in the periodic review of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. … In January 2005, a first external review draft of the Air Quality Criteria Document was released by EPA for public review and comment and for review by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC
70 FR 69761Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Small Business Assistance Program; Ohio
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 1995
The implementation plan was submitted by the State to satisfy the Federal mandate, found in section 507 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), to ensure that small businesses have access to the technical assistance … The Ohio program, submitted as a requested revision to the Ohio State Implementation Plan on May 17, 1994, and May 4, 1995, satisfies the requirements of section 507 of the Clean Air Act.
60 FR 42042Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.