Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

3.40s

  • Oral argument — Eagle County, Colorado v. STB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

    It has to meet Clean Air Act deadlines by certain federal deadlines. … Adding all of this oil downstream to refineries will only make that problem worse and hinder progress in achieving those Clean Air Act standards. This was a major problem throughout the entire EIS.

    157 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jason Bo-Alan Beckman

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

    I believe our brief was wrong when it asserted that plain air. Kyler versus Sullivan does supply the standard of review. … I, with that, I, I will end my argument without commenting on that comment. Thank you, Your Honor. I'll ask you one additional, one question.

    65 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Weithoner v. USPS

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2007

    Plus, it's impossible for people, while you can remove things from the file, for people not to remember, at least over a certain period of time, what happened. That's correct, Your Honor. … It would certainly be appropriate to place whether it be a comment of, you know, to the extent Ms. Withhonor seeks employment elsewhere within the Postal Service or to another employer.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ohio Valley Environmental Coal v. United States Army Corps

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2016

    Well, Your Honor, the distinction is the analysis of the state permitting under the Service Mining Act and the Clean Water Act really was directly relevant in the Maricoma decision to the question of whether … or the Clean Water Act discharge permits address human health, and here's how those issues satisfy the Corps' own obligations under NEPA.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Marriage of Rouse

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 26, 2017

    But it's almost like you're arguing why bother doing it, you know, if there are these balls up in the air, which is often the case. … And then – and again, the Turner's military pay wasn't just a clean set-off between the two.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jeanne Wallner v. JJB Hilliard WL Lyons LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2014

    I thought you just told us that the final warning was because she did not report during the period of FMLA leave and that she refused to come back during that period. … Walner ought to be held responsible for acting in a way that would have prompted others to act in an unprofessional way.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Sturgis Motorcycle Rally, Inc. v. Rushmore Photo & Gifts, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2018

    One, they have no, forget about long period of substantially exclusive use, they have no period of substantially exclusive use. And without that, they can't get the presumption. … Now we can, so defendants cannot come to court in equity when they lack clean hands, and we would say that the defendants clearly lacked clean hands by the jury verdict.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — OXEA Corp v. Certain Underwriters

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2026

    That's everything in this room, more or less, except for perhaps the oxygen in the air, the nitrogen in the air. … Perez was cleaning in April of 2019. Now, just as a bit of factual background here, every time that there's a turnaround, which is the incident in which Mr.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In Re Rau

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2016

    And then if we compare that to—if we look at A79 to what applicant says is their summary of claimed subject matter, we say that it says that the composition can prevent tooth decay, clean teeth, reduce … I don't see that as a fair argument because when in 55 on—in period 19 of Amon, when it talks about TRIS, it says it can be used in combination with other suitable buffers.

    29 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Delaware Riverkeeper Network v. FERC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2017

    This case involves claims under two separate statutes, the Clean Water Act and NEPA. … The timing of the—so, right, because your comment period is limited to 30 days after the EA is issued. Okay.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Darrell Connor v. Covil Corporation

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2021

    Directly working with asbestos, as compared to working in the training department and building P, that he described as clean as your own home, in Coble. … The fibers remain suspended in the air. So if they stopped five minutes before he approached, there would still be a lot of asbestos fibers in the air. It's important to note that.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hay v. New York Media LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2022

    And it specifically said the pattern of unspecified discriminatory acts that do not identify any particular acts occurring in New York City are insufficient to state a claim under the New York City Human … The contract they issued there was a contract to keep a source's identity confidential, a clean, discernible, distinct contract.

    24 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of California

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

    That was a motion that – the comment that the court made was with respect to a completely different motion. … Furthermore, all of the standards of federal environmental law that apply in Indian Country, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, so on and so forth, would apply to this tribe no less

    68 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Solorzano

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2023

    That's backed by bond, backed by Pepper, when it wipes the slate clean. That's not what I just want to believe, but that is backed by Supreme Court and the Fifth Circuit and other sister circuits. … He did take that into account, however, refused and did not, and specifically said, would not take into account the First Step Act. Whether, even if it's on plain air, Mr.

    27 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Auto Driveaway Franchise Syste v. Jeffrey Corbett

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2019

    A relationship test just sounds like hot air. … And then so we have a two-year period running right now? We have a two-year period running right now.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Tandy Miller v. Graham County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2015

    And that didn't really start to happen until the middle part of 2010 when she started to clean the restrooms once a week. And there were other people that cleaned the restrooms too. … , and this was over a period of time, was not sufficiently severe or pervasive to constitute a hostile work environment.

    30 min of audio
  • Oral argument — LITGO New Jersey Inc v. Commissioner NJ Dept of Environm Protection

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 14, 2013

    Well, not if the party is specifically submitting plans to that agency, Your Honor, and getting the comments and directions from the agencies and then following those comments and directions, and there's … The DEP brought in a cleanup company, Clean Ventures, and they proceeded to clean up in a sloppy way, which caused spills. And Senzari was excluded from access to his own property during this period.

    53 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re: 650 Fifth Avenue and Re

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

    That is clean air and should be available to anyone who has a claim under TRIA or any other claim they may want to make to it. … And I know there's a comment. I'm going to get to that. I'm going to get to that. I'll get to all of this.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — American Hospital Assn. v. Becerra

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2021

    In that case, the Court was interpreting a provision of the Clean Air Act that allowed the agency to regulate as necessary and appropriate. … The EPA's argument in that case was because another provision of the Clean Air Act directed regulation based on cost. It wouldn't read appropriate and necessary to include cost. And this Court...

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Emerald Performance Materials, LLC v. Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2016

    In fact, the Illinois river is not listed as impaired under the Clean Water Act for any parameter related to dissolved oxygen. … Under the Clean Water Act, there's this effluent standard that was adopted by Illinois.

    43 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.