Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Ortiz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 3, 2016

So it is a period of years. Mr. Rodriguez kept quite thorough records of loads coming in and money coming in and then being paid to his suppliers. … But it's the critical period of time where some of the videos were missing. Exactly.

Oral argument — Feesers v. Michael Foods

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 20, 2009

So although there's no Third Circuit case law commenting on Minneapolis Honeywell, the unbroken line of cases from every other circuit and the expert agency applies Minneapolis Honeywell whenever the differentially … So if we go back to the three-year period from 48 to 51 this might have been the law. Since 1951 every other circuit has said this is not the law.

Oral argument — Chen v. Atty Gen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I'd like you to comment on the things that I've just presented. Thanks. Are you okay, Ms. Barr? A little bit. It was a little bit. If I could clarify. All right. Let me just say it again. … So there was no actual violation of any family planning policy because they waited the standard waiting period, whether it's four or five years, depending on the province.

Oral argument — MacDonald v. Cashcall Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 24, 2018

The Federal Arbitration Act provides that if there's ambiguity, that ambiguity should be in favor of arbitration. … So it's just unenforceable, period.

Oral argument — Espinoza v. Atlas Railroad

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2016

There is no explanatory comment to any of the regulations. And there is very little case law. … My question is, how do you get to $35,000 in this case to get out of that where you had an 11-month period, he took four trips a month? How do we get to that number? You don't.

Oral argument — Finkelman v. National Football

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2015

But you decide that no tickets, no tickets are released to the general public and then the district judge says that at page 39 of the joint appendix, 35.1 doesn't apply to the NFL, period. … I have to comment that Pope Francis ignored New Jersey when he came to Pennsylvania. Could we turn to the standing issue? Correct. He had New Jersey at his heart. He flew over it.

Oral argument — United States v. Eastwick College

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2016

It's a False Claims Act case. And she, in that opinion, essentially said the Third Circuit was aligning itself with the more liberal circuits in terms of False Claims Act particularity. … It says he acted with intent. It doesn't say who was paid, and nothing of the EDFC district court rule for what.

Oral argument — Crystallex International Corp v. Petroleos De Venezuela

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

District Court to say that a reasonable period of time has passed and you can execute on the judgment? … I can't comment on it. Thank you, Your Honor. Thank you. Mr. Weigel, am I pronouncing your name correctly? Absolutely, Your Honor. Thank you very much.

Oral argument — Wilson v. Beard

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

If someone is being paid periodically, or is getting favors periodically, as an informant, there is an implication that the informant may want to maintain that relationship and will testify to please whoever … We have basically comments to the judge, informal comments after the prosecution has already rested at the end of the second day of trial, before the defense is about to come in.

Oral argument — United States v. Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2015

rather than reckless acts? … With respect to Judge Ambrose's comment a few moments ago about a Supreme Court decision, there is the Barons v.

Oral argument — United States v. Adair

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

Application note six was amended in 2013 in light of the Protect Act. … Yes, Your Honor, I just have two very brief comments.

Oral argument — PJM Power Providers Group v. Fed Energy Regulatory Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2024

Now, the filed rate doctrine is a fundamental part of the Federal Power Act. … Well, again, I think under the Federal Power Act, Your Honor, rates is a term of art.

Oral argument — Mc Cutceon v. Americas Servicing

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

was very familiar with the loan process and with the standardized loan documents that were put before him, both with regard to the Fremont mortgage and the other four mortgages that he had in the short period … I would just like for you to comment on how you see Act 91 fitting into this problem. Yes, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. The CHUBBInstitute

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2011

Salary is fixed income over a period of time for services rendered. So on its face, you wouldn't think salary to be included within the statute. … I would like to address a separate issue to the Chubb Corporation, but first I just wanted to comment briefly on two questions Your Honor has asked my co-counsel.

Oral argument — K.E. v. Northern Highlands Regional

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 16, 2020

A fair reading of that document is that any agreement by her was conditioned on Northern Highlands' acceptance of her handwritten comments. … It is similar to the legal analysis for prevailing parties under various civil rights acts as in a 1983 action and alike. So while there can be a reduction of the.

Oral argument — In Re Wa Wa Inc Data

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 30, 2023

We have not preserved the Class Action Fairness Act that they count as a coupon. That's true. But what do you mean by that? … And that's important because those changes were pursuant to the settlement agreement subject to a court order for a period of at least two years.

Oral argument — United States v. Ladner

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 11, 2007

Ladner left the district prior to that, during that period or not. … This is not a ministerial act where someone behind a counter is just looking at a printout.

Oral argument — INREPhiladelphia Newspapers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2009

We're within our exclusivity period. This plan was proposed within our exclusivity period. So if we propose a plan that goes under – You're saying something a little different. … Pay Itself Act actually comes out. Will dollar for dollar go to them or what? It would go to them. It would if they structured it properly. I mean, I can tell them how to structure it.

Oral argument — United States v. Gussie

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2022

The statute in this instance, the crimes, and the last overt act in the series of crimes and 119 count indictment occurred on or about was alleged to have occurred on or about May 30 2012. … I'm going to direct my comments initially to the statute of limitations issue since that appears to be the court's focus. First direct.

Oral argument — 21-204421-2174United States of America v. Donnie SmithAbid StevensMaurice Quinn

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 16, 2022

And that's why the trial judge gave me the justification in defense of others because of the fact that my client's wife was in the store for a brief period of time. … Of course, the Third Circuit was in the position of evaluating the judge's comments, looks to the legislative history.