Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Michael Backlund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 15, 2011

The thrust of the argument is that their authority to make this a crime comes from the Organic Act. The Organic Act says in order to prevent fires and depredations in the forest, you can make rules. … They cleaned up the site. It was only after they finished cleaning it up that the Forest Service suddenly invented this crime to charge them with. Now, so that's the first argument.

Oral argument — Fisher Sand & Gravel v. Las Vegas Paving Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2011

Doesn't that really go to exactly why there's an act of bad faith here? … It's not like we come to a clean slate in January of 2010. This is not a clean slate.

Oral argument — Cynthia Prosterman v. American Airlines, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2018

Even without the meeting, what the court did was, against all precedent, took each and every separate act and analyzed each act, and finding that in itself it did not state a claim. … And that refers to an alleged agreement by the airlines to, quote, prevent air travelers from being able to combine the least expensive, nonrefundable one-way fares.

Oral argument — Certain Underwriters v. Inlet Fisheries Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007

I think it's important to note that this stand-alone vessel pollution insurance was developed by the insurers starting in 1972 after the Clean Water Act. … It was with respect to the insurance that was issued during that period of time. Well, it was the principle was established, correct, in terms of the duty.

Oral argument — Boyer v. Romero

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2006

So why don't you just come clean on this? I mean, this whole thing sounds like a Keystone Cop scenario. I mean, it's, you know, it's kind of laughable. … They say that if the longest period of time that of the 20 to 30 minutes, what's the longest period of time that could have elapsed before they found out this is not the guy, and what we've been told simply

Oral argument — United States v. Shawn Jackson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2009

Now, interestingly enough, Sean Jackson, when he was questioned, made a comment that's very similar to that, that kind of has not been picked up on by the defense in this case. … My experience is that the defense expert brings it in, and that property is on there, and then that defense expert wipes the hard drive clean before they leave the facility.

Oral argument — Shaun Burney v. Ron Broomfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

And the only act that Bernie took was firing once. You mean the only act he took was opening the trunk, looking at the guy, taking out his gun, and putting one in the guy's head? … Turning to the court's comments and the due process claim, the court's comments did not render Mr. Bernie's trial fundamentally unfair.

Oral argument — Gabriel Moran v. The Screening Pros, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2021

The agency's comments for Section 1681C-A-5 states, quote, the seven-year reporting period runs from the date of disposition release or parole as applicable. But that's prior. … But it didn't affirm that comment specifically, right?

Oral argument — United States v. Jonathan McGinley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2010

He acted, there was a period of time when judges only had like 10 days to correct an error. They have 14 days. At the time he acted here the law had changed, is that right? Correct. … A five-year period of supervised release is available? That wouldn't permit it, yes, because it's a Class A felony.

Oral argument — Carole Krechman v. County of Riverside

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2013

But some of the comments we made and potential bias in favor of police because of some of the comments made by the judge. … Well, yes, he did make those comments.

Oral argument — Anderson v. Michaelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2004

This is a fraudulent transfer case that arises under the Arizona Fraudulent Transfer Act, and we fundamentally are dealing with two errors by the District Court. … That's the only one commented on the judge. Everything else he's silent on because of his error in applying the standard of law. I apparently am out of time. Okay.

Oral argument — Tibbetts v. Kulongoski

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 4, 2009

Where does the 19-day period fall in there? It falls outside of that limit. It's a more difficult question there. … And then it says, except where noted, at all material times, Kuligowski was acting in the course and scope of his employment with the state of Washington.

Oral argument — POSNANSKI v. GIBNEY

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2005

Gibney was acting as. And so the issue comes up with frauds and concealment. You only need eight days, and you're home free. … I'd like to comment on the choice of law question, but first I'll answer your question. Thank you.

Oral argument — Kazim Acar v. Tesla Motors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 15, 2016

Our amendment history, though, if you look back at the case, this is a standard, the standard issue exchange act can be kissed. … The comment to which the reporter refers was made in direct response to the reported incident. Tell us what you know about the Washington fire. That was an unusual fire.

Oral argument — United States v. Manraksa

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2003

of 2001, within that six-month period of time. … Teller talks about equity, the question is, are you allowed to present to the jury that you're clean as the driven snow? In fact, you are not.

Oral argument — United States v. Theodora Morsette

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

So the issue here, though, is we're here on plain air review on this issue. Yes. So he's arguing that it was obviously plain air here to let that conviction come in. … Why was it plain air? Well, I don't believe there was plain air. There wasn't plain air. No. Whatever. Because I don't think they can reach the . . .

Oral argument — United States v. Charles Soderman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2011

So that reluctance is continuing throughout this entire period, and that's why all of that inducing conduct is necessary throughout that entire period before Charles gets to the point where he actually … He made comments, and we can talk about the comments he made that suggested there may have been sexual acts at some point, but he didn't make any comments, didn't express any fantasies, had never expressed

Oral argument — Paul Cox, Jr. v. Karen Powers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2013

Cox acted in justifiable self-defense. … You didn't comment on that argument in your brief, as I recall. I'm sorry? I don't remember you commenting on that argument in your brief.

Oral argument — United States v. Gerardo Farias-Contreras

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 18, 2022

And also, it is under plain air review, right? … So, the fourth element of plain air is usually something like that the air, if not corrected, would impugn the integrity fairness, integrity, or reputation of the court. Is that right?

Oral argument — United States v. Asarco Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2005

EPA acted consistently with that. But the parties bargained over the separate contingency of what if EPA decides it has to do something different. That's what we say was anticipated. … In all big decisions, and there's probably no bigger decision than cleaning up the environment, things have to be done incrementally.