Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Ronald Collins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2020

And then he was actually confined there for a period of eight months. … Morgan, would you like to offer some comments in rebuttal? I would, Your Honor. I appreciate the opportunity to do so.

Oral argument — Denise Minter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

May it please the Court, I think it might be helpful to begin with just a couple of comments about the RESPA statute in Section A, which is the primary focus of our briefs. … And those make the point essentially that this is a consumer protection statute, that Congress made the judgment in 1974, after conducting months of hearings over a period of several years, that referral

Oral argument — John P. Fitzgerald, III v. Alfred H. Siegel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2020

They acted on an expedited basis. … Sandberg's comments, it is true that the liquidating trustee in this case has requested multiple extensions of the term of the trust, and he did so in every instance to enable creditors to recover as much

Oral argument — Amanda Smith v. Mark Averill

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2025

It was a two-week period. So every two weeks, Ms. Smith would go in and say, where do we stand with accommodations? What are we doing? How are we doing it? And it was, we're waiting on the 15-6. … First, the record evidence does not show that the acts complained of by Ms.

Oral argument — Variety Stores, Inc v. Walmart Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2020

Walmart sold hundreds of millions of products over a period of years, and Variety never identified a single confused consumer. … It doesn't, Your Honor, because the court's comment at that point was entirely conditional on whether Walmart submitted an interlocutory appeal or not and Walmart did submit a request for an interlocutory

Oral argument — Susan Scharpf v. General Dynamics Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2025

Uh, in Edmondson, you quoted Judge Motz saying the purpose of the fraudulent concealment doctrine is to ensure that wrongdoers are not permitted or encouraged to take advantage of the limitations period … So maybe three comments on that, Your Honor. So one, the cases that address this question go our way, but as to why they go our way, let me say two things in respect to that.

Oral argument — United States v. Erick Hobbs

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2021

The comment about the police officers was something he had made to Foreman and Foreman had relayed to the police, and the comment was along the lines of if they don't recognize my ID or they try to shoot … I think that is an act of good faith on his part.

Oral argument — Rhino Energy, LLC v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

Rule for the requisite period of one year as that term is defined and delineated within the Black Lung Benefits Act. Again, qualifying Wildcat as a potentially liable operator. … If I could just comment briefly, Judge Wilkinson. If we send it back to the ALJ, the ALJ is not going to have any evidence about the financial wherewithal, and it's not going to be able to get it.

Oral argument — Baby Doe v. Joshua Mast

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2025

And we've made no comment with respect to any litigation, and we don't tell you that those are the people that are involved in the litigation. … Of course, we don't think Rule 26 does violate the Rules Enabling Act precisely because it doesn't stretch that far.

Oral argument — John Doe 1 v. Roy Cooper, III

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2016

How does somebody know if they've committed a criminal act? … The state never before the district court made any comments about that study.

Oral argument — T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

I thought the court was commenting on... You thought the court was like misrepresenting itself? No. No. Just the opposite. You said that's what it was doing. Oh, I didn't know the court was musing. … It occurred months earlier and was temporarily and substantively distinct from the act of entering that by the court.

Oral argument — Jeremy Marks v. Thomas Dann

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2014

It does not provide for a non-vesting period for the stock options, and no-cost stock options to the employees. … that he was acting outside the scope of his employment, because under Maryland law, he would have had to have been acting solely for his personal benefit in order to be not acting on behalf of the employer

Oral argument — Trustees of the Plumbers v. Plumbing Services, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2015

And that's the only way their claim succeeds is if that letter of assent, the first thing, is it a contract under Alabama law, period. … It said if it had used my term obligor pursuant to the act, would your argument be the same?

Oral argument — White Coat Waste Project v. Greater Richmond Transit Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 21, 2021

I recognize that some of this court's decisions, including Peltier, sort of look act by act. … It's no question they could ban every political act. Period. That's what Lehman stands for. You could.

Oral argument — United States v. Jeffrey Cohen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2018

And the pre-sentence report was revised five different times in response to comments by the government, by the court, and by the defendant. … The judge, the state court judge, moved out of his house for a period of time as a result of the threat he perceived from this defendant, who he called at sentencing, scary smart.

Oral argument — Mutual Assurance Society of VA v. Federal Insurance Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2021

And I'll focus primarily in my comments today on that point, why Virginia would not subscribe and does not subscribe and has never subscribed to the Horace Mann rule of the true excess rule. … This court put, the society's argument improperly focuses on discrete subsections of the policies rather than the effect of the policies as a whole, period, end quote.

Oral argument — Pia McAdams v. Nationstar Mortgage

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 28, 2021

In the case below, the plaintiff alleged that Nationstar violated the Rule of State Settlement Procedures Act of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act with respect to plaintiffs and the class members' loss … Hauschen's comments about the district court's consideration of the GFE loop factors in approving the settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate.

Oral argument — Lai Lau v. Bin Ke

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2026

Key's comments as an objection and to fulfill the requirements of Rule 15, but I'm not aware of any case that imposes that duty on the district court. Your Honor, it's not a duty... … The thing I really want to say is that we are living in—this case went on for a long period of time. My client is totally stressed out.

Oral argument — United States v. John Franklin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2013

But in terms of, there's a period of time that elapses, because he's describing what occurred, that the front seat passenger went through his pockets and took out stuff, and there's a discussion about … The only other issue I would comment on, your honor, is in terms of the ineffective claim.

Oral argument — Erwin Tobar-Barrera v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2013

Period. So I see that I have eight seconds left. … I just wanted to make a couple comments. Yes, we are. We are arguing that the Sixth Circuit, we are advocating for the Sixth Circuit interpretation of actions taken.