Documents

Oral argument — Park B. Smith v. CHF Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 4, 2009

There are comments in your brief about it being crowded and so forth. That's a fact matter that hasn't been decided yet. That's what you say. … That 30-day period expired on November 2nd of 2008. And again, nothing was filed by Park B. Smith. So they've had opportunity... What about Rule 54B type of a motion? Couldn't they make that?

Oral argument — BEER v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2012

Period. Is that any different than giving you $20,000 all in one swoop? … What's your response to those comments? Well, of course, in general, that's true.

Oral argument — In Re TC Heartland LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2016

And Your Honor, as you pointed out, Congress has been looking at this throughout this entire time period. … And if one traces throughout the time period before the 2011 Act and since then and looks at the variety of options, they stray from staying still somewhat broad to getting incredibly narrow to carving

Oral argument — Corus Staal BV v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2006

review will cover entries, exports, or sales during the relevant period. … This was an administrative review of Horace's sales during the particular period of review.

Oral argument — FISCHER SA COMERCIO v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2011

This is a case about whether commerce acted reasonably based on records and the arguments that were before it in this case. … Taylor, if you'd like to make a comment. Thank you. Just two quick points. The first of them is the precision of how it was raised. The argument at the time was about the use of standard bricks.

Oral argument — WHITE BUFFALO CONSTRUCTION v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

Can I – if you're finished at that point, can I ask you to comment on the jurisdictional question that you argued, something like – and specifically, could you address the question of whether Judge Smith … Is it crystal clear that the six-year period is jurisdictional? Well, by that, Your Honor, it means it can't be told. No, no.

Oral argument — Bannum, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

Who are you accusing of having committed the bad act? Alston Wilkes, towards the BOP, when it held out Mr. … I think, I guess I can say Judge Horne stole a comment I made during an argument below about there being a strange dance and you sort of picked up on that.

Oral argument — Henley v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2017

He had two choices, which was to resign or to await the next retaliatory act. … Yes, yes, and the comment about his father. And the comment about his father.

Oral argument — Boeing Company v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2024

The Contract Disputes Act amended the Tucker Act in section 1491A2 to confer jurisdiction to resolve all claims that, quote, relate to a contract. … If the secretary of the B.A. promulgates a regulation that says, in this instance, you get benefits for this period of time, it's flatly inconsistent with the statute that gives benefits for a longer period

Oral argument — ABB, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2018

There are adjustments made with respect to differences in the credit period in each market, the credit period being the time. Were those what you're describing made in this case? Yes. Okay. … There were none paid in the home market period.

Oral argument — In Re Neill

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 7, 2016

It may be just a very short period of time, but it's still storage of those single frames. … Judge Moore, you commented that the government was... The PTO was lucky to have a deferential standard of review, but I don't think that's going to be enough for them here.

Oral argument — Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015

They alleged their property was taken for a finite period of time, concluding at the date, I suppose, of the Ninth Circuit's opinion saying that the court lacked jurisdiction. … You have one more comment to make? Well, I was just going to comment on the transactions test, for example.

Oral argument — In Re St. Helena Hospital

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 9, 2014

Heissler comments that there's small differences between them. Small differences are not enough to render them dissimilar for purposes of the first DuPont factor. Well, they sound alike. … Well, I think they correctly found that in a hospital-based setting, if you're going to give up a period of time, you're going to take a break, as it were, from your life for a period of time to improve

Oral argument — W. J. v. HHS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2023

The Vaccine Act says this is a petition in the Court of Federal Claims, provides for a three-year period after majority. What's the language there? … I appreciate your comment that some of these cases involve adults.

Oral argument — HALL v. BED BATH

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2011

And during the period of time in which the patent was pending, he manufactured towels. He indicated very clearly a patent pending on his towels on the label and the packaging. … And it was not an inadvertent comment. It was a repeated statement. In fact, Mr. Holland lodged in his own declaration. Dr. Moore, more negotiations than advertising?

Oral argument — South Alabama Medical Science v. Gnosis S.P.A.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2015

With respect to... so to the extent that that was not done, and so the Board... so to Your Honor, Judge Plager's comment, that would be the one defense that we would choose to be... … In this case, I'd like to address some of the comments that my opposing counsel just made to the court. First point he talked about was the fact that expectation of success.

Oral argument — Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2024

So what is your argument that tells me you were not aware of that wrongdoing until a six-year period preceding your complaint? … The department didn't act on it. Actually, there are two Federal Register notices. It considered the request, had a Federal Register notice for public comment, and didn't reach a decision.

Oral argument — Boyer v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2023

Sure, but you're supposed to do one statutory interpretation, period. … Except for the Equal Pay Act.

Oral argument — Vanartsdalen v. DOJ

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 2, 2016

Or how is one of these individuals ever going to be able to obtain assistance post the amendment of the act? … Well, maybe between that period of time is when all of the psychological dilemmas arose. Well, but you also have, with Dr. Elkins and Dr.

Oral argument — Bannum, Inc. v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2015

Who are you accusing of having committed the bad act? Alston Wilkes, towards the BOP, when it held out Mr. … I think, I guess I can say Judge Horne stole a comment I made during an argument below about there being a strange dance and you sort of picked up on that.