Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
7,792 results
0.24s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Flores de Brenes v. Transportes Aereos Nacionales, S. A.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994
Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 423 (1964). As the Court put it in Oetjen v. Central Leather Co., 246 U.S. 297, 304 (1918), quoting Under- hill v. … Sabbatino, 376 U.S. at 823 n.25.
512 U.S. 1222Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2026
Ford, 418 U.S. at 423. … Ford, 498 U.S. at 423.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Harbor Tug & Barge Co. v. Papai
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Wilander, 498 U.S. Se Ge cnkkcdecdncebnansaculeesdcuesabaceumeatd 2 Offshore Co. v. Robison, 266 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1959) ..... 7 Sharp v. Johnson Bros. Corp., 973 F.2d 423 (5th Cir. … Gizoni, 502 U.S. 81 (1991) ...2, 7 Statutes Crrep: 33 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq.
520 U.S. 548Amicus Curiae Brief — Directv, Inc. v. Imburgia, 135 S. Ct. 1547 (2015) (No. 14-462)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Casarotto, 517 U.S. at 687 n.3 (quoting Perry, 482 U.S. at 492 n.9). … Per- ry, 482 U.S. at 492 n.9 (emphasis added).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Flowers Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Angelo Brock
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 11, 2025
McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 226 (1987) (quoting Moses H. Cone Mem. Hosp. v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 (1983)). … Express, 482 U.S. at 226 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Richard Devillier, et al., Petitioners v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 20, 2023
Boule, 596 U.S. 482, 491 (2022). … County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), which confirmed that “it has been established at least since Jacobs v.
Amicus Curiae Brief — E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Co. v. United States (No. 06-726)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Best- foods, 524 U.S. 51, 55 (1998). … Edison, 423 F.3d at 100 (stating that “discouraging voluntary cleanup . . . undercut[s] one of CERCLA’s main goals”).
Amicus Curiae Brief — RiseandShine Corporation, dba Rise Brewing, Petitioner v. PepsiCo, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 15, 2026
See id. at 419-420, 422-423. … Hana Fin., 574 U.S. at 423.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Spahn v. Wittman
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 110 S.Ct. 2841 (1990)...... 9 Estate of Leach v. … Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 288-289, 110 S.Ct. 2841, 2857 (1990) (O'Conner, J., concurring); Jn re L.W., 167 Wis.2d at 70, 482 N.W.2d at 66; In re Conroy, 98 N.J. at 373,
522 U.S. 951Amicus Curiae Brief — Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1978
Transcontinental Pipe Line Corp, 423 U.S, 326 (1976). … Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp, 423 U.S. 826, 331 (1976).
435 U.S. 519Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 1, 2024
Provident Securities, 423 U.S. 232 (1976). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 General American Investors Co., Inc. v. … Provident Securities, 423 U.S. 232, (1976) (“Foremost-McKesson”) (“It is inappropriate to reach the harsh result of imposing § 16 (b)’s liability without fault on the basis of unclear language. . . .
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jun 3, 2020
See U.S. … See U.S.
Amicus Curiae Brief — John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States (No. 06-1164)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008
County of L.A., 482 U.S. 304 (1987) .... 6-8 Hair v. United States, 350 F.3d 1253 ad dit iddededhenkenvesesonnsnueee 8 Henke v. … County of L.A., 482 U.S. 304 (1987) (citing United States v. Clarke, 445 U.S. 253, 257 (1980)), (quoting 6 P. Nichols, Eminent Domain § 25.41 (3d rev. ed. 1972)); see also Paul J.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Hernandez v. Mesa, 136 S. Ct. 567 (2015) (No. 15-118)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
Robbins, 551 U.S. 537, 550 (2007). … Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 482(1)(b) (1987).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 18, 2026
Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423–24 (2021). This Court should recommit the judiciary to its proper constitutional role. … Ramirez, 594 U.S. 413, 423 (2021) (citation modified).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Maryland v. Blake
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 (1975)(emphasis added). … Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 110 n2 (White, J., concurring). 26 coercive initiation of communications with overwhelming psychological impact.'’
546 U.S. 72Amicus Curiae Brief — Scholberg v. Lifchez
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, Bg EE Cee 1. 3, & 7 United Airlines v. McDonald, 423 U.S. 385 (1977)........ 9 Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S.Ct. … McDonald, 423 U.S. 385 (1977) As to the element of having an interest in the matter, the interest of not being experimented on or sold is plainly seen.
498 U.S. 1069Amicus Curiae Brief — Freeman v. Burlington Broadcasters, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000
City of Virginia Beach, 155 F. 3d 423 (4th Cir. 1998). … State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, 461 U.S. 190 (1983).
531 U.S. 917Amicus Curiae Brief — First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Telepromp- ter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 411, 483 (1982); Whether the ordinance destroys a “major portion” of the property’s value, First English I, 482 U.S. … Thus, perhaps the “great deal of litigation” feared by Justice Stevens as a result of First English I, 482 U.S. at 322, can be avoided.
493 U.S. 1056Amicus Curiae Brief — Boys Markets, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 770
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1970
Courtney, 388 U.S. 502:=......... ‘CaD. Draucker, Inc. y. International Union of Op- erating Engineers, 350 F 2d 936, cert. den. 384 U.S. 904 International Union v. … " Labor-Management Relations Act 423-24 (1947).
398 U.S. 235
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.