Documents

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Fuhrman & Forster Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1941

STATEMENT This proceeding was instituted before the United States Processing ax Board of Review by a peti- tion filed September 1, 1938 (R. 3-8), and an amended petition filed April 24, 1939 (R. 42 … Rasquin, 100 F. (2d) 399 (Pet. 6-7).

Opposition Brief — Publishers Business Services, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 13, 2019

Petitioners obtained nearly $24 million through their scheme. Id. at 60a. 2. … Porter, 328 U.S. at 398-399.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Fouzia Lakhloufi, Petitioner v. Mohammad Ali Nimber Abuzanet

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Aug 27, 2025

Argued and submitted on July 24, 2024. Rachael A. Federico argued the cause for appellant. Also on the brief were Rachel M. Hungerford and Legal Aid Services of Oregon. No appearance for respondent. … Rickenbach, 273 Or at 399.

Respondents Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 13, 2021

JA623-24. … Br. 21-24; see also ARP Br. 29-30; Brnovich Br. 24, 32.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001). In Guill v. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399, 407 (2000) (quoting Alexander v. Commissioner, 72 F.3d at 946), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Hertz Corp. v. Cox

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973

Co. of Baltimore, et al., 208 Ill. 275, 70 N E 399 _______.____._____-__--------- 4 II Diza A. v. Patterson, 263 U. S. 399, 68 L. ed. 356 (1923), 44S Ct 151 11 Erie Railroad Company v. … Crowe, underwent brain sur- gery at Emory University Hospital on Mrch 24, 1966, and is neither physically nor mentally able to give an affi- davit for use herein at this time.

Petitioners Brief — Bernal v. Fainter

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1984

Hurley, 366 U.S. 117, 123-24 (1961). … United States, 350 U.S. 399, 405 (1956). In addition, people do not become “officials of government by virtue of being lawyers.” Id. at 729.

Opposition Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

F.C.C., 399 F.2d 65 SE Mitty: AIEEE einhisistiansainanpasuclbcdgtrindadcanasaseuiaancsaunen 26,27 Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) ................ 16 Buckley v. … United States, 238 F.2d 584, 587 (4th Cir. 1956), (Cable service is ‘“‘a mere adjunct of the television receiving sets with which it was connected ...”’). 24 tem, Inc. v.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — American Well & Prospecting Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1956

Commissioner, 179 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1950) affirming 12 T. C. 197 (1949) .... 8 United States v. Kingman, 170 F. 2d 408 (Sth Cir. … Commissioner of Internal Revenue accepted that finding in his brief which he tiled with the Court of Appeals and incorporated it in his statement of the question involved on the appeal pursuant to Rule 24

Amicus Curiae Brief — Richardson v. Perales

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971

Gardner, 399 F.2d 532 (9th Cir. 1968), the court stated: [W]e doubt that [the amendment] was designed to restrict the medical evidence to “objective” or “‘phy- sical” symptoms. … ay 24 along with a claimant.”® Not only does the presence of an attorney at a hearing greatly improve a claimant’s chances of success at the hearing, but it also increases the chance that an unfavorable

Amicus Curiae Brief — Jody Lombardo, et al., Petitioners v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 26, 2020

Lee, 399 F.3d 954 (8th Cir. 2005) ....................... 14 Darden v. City of Fort Worth, 880 F.3d 722 (5th Cir. 2018) ....................... 12 Delacruz v. … Graham, 490 U.S. at 396; Kingsley, 576 U.S. at 397, 399.

Petitioners Brief — Procunier v. Atchley

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1971

Crouse, 399 F.2d 311 (10th Cir. 1968) ........ 36 Canales v. Baker, 406 F.2d 685, (10th Cir. 1969) ........ 36 Chambers v. Florida, 309 U.S. 227 (1989) .............. 24 Commonwealth v. … Berve, 51 Cal.2d 286, 332 P.2d 97 (1958)...... 23, 24 People v. Gonzales, 24 Cal.2d 870, 151 P.2d 251 (1944) 23 People v. Millum, 42 Cal.2d 524, 267 P.2d 10389 (1954) 24 People v.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Roberto Lopez-Ortiz, Petitioner v. Massachusetts

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 22, 2025

Kozec, 399 Mass. 514 (1987) ......................................................... 18 Commonwealth v. Lopez-Ortiz, 105 Mass. App. … Kozec, 399 Mass. 514, 518 n.8 (1987), in turn citing Commonwealth v. Bourgeois, 391 Mass. 869, 884 (1984)).

Hours of Service (HOS) of Drivers; Application for Renewal and Expansion of American Pyrotechnics Association (APA) Exemption From the 14-Hour Rule During Independence Day Celebrations

Federal Register · Notice · Apr 7, 2015

The online Federal document management system is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. … The carriers and drivers must comply with all other requirements of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (49 CFR parts 350-399) and Hazardous Materials Regulations (49 CFR parts 105-180).

Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

Federal Register · Notice · Dec 9, 2016

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 24 CFR part 581 and section 501 of the Stewart B. … For complete details concerning the processing of applications, the reader is encouraged to refer to the interim rule governing this program, 24 CFR part 581.

Safety Zones; Humboldt Bay Bar and Entrance Channel, Eureka, CA, Noyo River Entrance Channel, Ft. Bragg, CA, and Crescent City Harbor Entrance Channel, Crescent City, CA

Federal Register · Rule · Oct 3, 2019

Coast Guard; telephone (415) 399-3585, email at SFWaterways@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. … Dated: September 24, 2019. Marie B. Byrd, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, San Francisco. [FR Doc. 2019-21281 Filed 10-2-19; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Front Range Energy Associates, L.L.C., et al. Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings

Federal Register · Notice · May 26, 1999

Comment date: May 24, 1999, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 21. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. [Docket No. … Comment date: May 28, 1999, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice. 24. PECO Energy Company [Docket No.

Mootness: An Explanation of the Justiciability Doctrine

Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 7, 2007

However, the Court has held that this exception applies only in “exceptional situations,” where the plaintiff “can make a reasonable showing that he will again be subjected to the alleged illegality.”24 … Iowa, 419 U.S. 393, 399 (1975).

Appendix — Elrod v. Massarella

Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1983

United States, 266 F.2d 397, 399 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 985 (1959). … Weaver Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29 n.12 (1981), quoting Hopt v. Utah, 110 US. 574, 590 (1884). The extension of the statute of limitations in this case was just such a merely procedural’’ change.

Reply Brief — Connecticut, Petitioner v. Michael Skakel

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Dec 7, 2018

BIO 24-25. On the other hand, the defendant quotes dicta in United States v. … A-399 to A-405, HT4/16/13: 233-34, HT4/18/13: 187.