Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.49s
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jan 12, 1994
This SIP revision was submitted by Delaware to satisfy the Federal mandate of the Clean Air Act (CAA) to ensure that small businesses have access to the technical assistance and regulatory information … This action is being taken in accordance with the provisions of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 11, 1994. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Thomas J.
Environmental Protection AgencyProposed Generic Communication; Laboratory Testing of Nuclear- Grade Activated Charcoal (M97978)
Federal Register · Notice · Feb 25, 1998
DATES: Comment period expires March 27, 1998. … test (in a laboratory) samples of charcoal taken from the air-cleaning units.
63 FR 9581Nuclear Regulatory CommissionFederal Register · Notice · Jun 20, 2007
Clean Air Act requires that EPA carry out periodic reviews of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for major “criteria” air pollutants and to revise the NAAAQS for a given pollutant, as appropriate … Initiating the next review of these standards at this time is consistent with the Clean Air Act's requirement that the Agency periodically review the latest scientific information and the standards.
72 FR 34005Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 7, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included Santa Barbara … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 54559Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 16, 2001
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (NH DES) requested approval to implement and enforce State permit terms and conditions … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: May 2, 2001. Ira W.
66 FR 27055Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; OR; Oakridge PM10 Redesignation to Attainment and Maintenance Plan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 9, 2022
EPA proposes these actions pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 8, 2022. … Clean Air Act Requirements for Redesignation to Attainment III. EPA's Analysis of Oregon's Submittal A. Attainment Determination B.
87 FR 27540Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Feb 8, 1994
regulate emissions of the HAP's listed in section 112(b) of the Clean Air Act (Act). … achievable * * *'' [Clean Air Act Section 112(d)(2)].
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 14, 1998
Air Act (CAA), as amended in 1990. … SIP approvals under Section 110 and subchapter I, part D of the Clean Air Act do not create any new requirements, but simply approve requirements that the State is already imposing.
63 FR 18122Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 10, 1998
Air Act (Act) as amended in 1990, which will aid in ensuring the attainment of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. … Clean Air Act Requirements Section 182(b)(1) of the Act as amended in 1990 requires all ozone nonattainment areas classified as moderate and above to submit a SIP revision by November 15, 1993, which
63 FR 6659Environmental Protection AgencyOzone Air Quality Standards: EPA’s March 2008 Revision
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Apr 18, 2008
As defined in Section 109 of the Clean Air Act, NAAQS are standards that apply to ambient (outdoor) air. The act directs EPA to set both primary and secondary standards. … The Clean Air Act’s definition of welfare is found in Section 302(h) of the act.
RL34057Congressional Research ServiceGreenkraft Inc.; Grant of Application for a Temporary Exemption From FMVSS No. 108
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 5, 2015
In order to qualify as a low-emission vehicle, the vehicle must meet the applicable standards for new motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7521, et seq. … Eligibility As discussed above, the applicant must demonstrate that the vehicle emits an air pollutant in an amount significantly below one of the standards established under the Clean Air Act in order
80 FR 12057Transportation DepartmentNational Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationAir Plan Approval; Wisconsin; Milwaukee Second 10-Year 2006 24-Hour PM2.5 Limited Maintenance Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 9, 2024
The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on April 18, 2024. EPA received no comments on the proposal and is finalizing our action as proposed. II. … The limited maintenance plan submission satisfies the second 10-year planning requirement of section 175A(b) of the Clean Air Act for the Milwaukee-Racine area.
89 FR 56231Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 9, 2018
In response to the EPA's July 31, 2018 proposed rulemaking on New Jersey's SIP submittals, the EPA received four comments during the 30-day public comment period. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 50506Environmental Protection AgencyOral argument — MacClarence v. EPA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2009
Air Act. … of the Clean Air Act.
27 min of audioNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Iron and Steel Foundries
Federal Register · Rule · May 20, 2005
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), judicial review of the direct final rule amendments is available only by filing a petition for review in the U.S. … We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on the direct final rule.
70 FR 29400Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 14, 2000
The intended effect of the limited approvals and limited disapprovals is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … DATES: Comments must be received in writing on or before December 14, 2000. ADDRESSES: Mail comments to Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office Chief (AIR-4), Air Division, U.S.
65 FR 68114Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Dec 21, 2015
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and National Ambient Air … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including sulfur oxides
80 FR 79330Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2010
EPA has determined that these SIP revisions comply with the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations, are consistent with EPA policies, and will improve air quality. … This action is being taken under section 110 and parts C and D of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 29, 2010.
75 FR 15648Environmental Protection AgencyAppendix — Manchester Environmental Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
quality standards—the 1977 Amendments to the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L.
459 U.S. 1035Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead
Federal Register · Rule · Oct 18, 2016
This review of the standards and the air quality criteria (the scientific information upon which the standards are based) is required by the Clean Air Act on a periodic basis. … Legislative Requirements Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS.
81 FR 71906Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.