Documents

Reply Brief — Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation, Petitioner v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 13, 2018

Br. 22-24. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 416 (2012), especially where, as here, the possibility of clearer phrasing cuts both ways.

Reply Brief — Russell Bucklew, Petitioner v. Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Sep 14, 2018

Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .... 11 Glossip v. Gross, 135 S. Ct. 2726 (2015) ...... 10 Hamm v. Dunn, 138 S. Ct. 828 (2018)......... 9 Holland v. Florida, 560 U.S. 631 (2010) ..... 13 Hutto v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 401–02, 409–10 (1986).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Michael Lowry, Robert Mulgrew, and Thomasine Tynes, Petitioners v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 17, 2019

Broad St., Ste. 810 Philadelphia, PA 19109 (215) 399-9592 lam@mathewson-law.com Attorney for Petitioner Tynes MEREDITH A. … See Appx. 24a n.25; but see Appx. 23a n.24 (accepting that Tynes joined the motion).

Reply Brief — Kay v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1938

Supp. 399......... . United States v. Solder, ed. Supp. 944.......-.. : Virginian Ry. v. Federation, 300 U.S. 515...... Pr Oe » Wall v. … Schor, 13 F. 8. 399; U. S. v. Harding; ~ 81 F. (2d) 503; Madden v. U. S., 80 F: (2d) 672; Langer v. U.S.,76 F. (2d) 817; U.S. v. Solder, 10 F. 8. 944; U. 5. v.

Opinion — Alexander v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1972

Georgia, 389 U: S. 24; - 25 (1967); Sims v:. Gasela, 389 U. S. 404, 407 (1967). … Florida, 399 .U. S: 78, 100; Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U. 8. 510, 520; Bailard v.

Motion — United States v. Connecticut Nat. Bank

Supreme Court brief · Motion · 1974

Phillipsburg National Bank, 399 U.S. 350 United States v. Third National Bank in Nashville, UO UL. TT CARRE) occ wnneecesssassesascnsces 20 United States v. … Phillipsburg National Bank & Trust Co., 399 U.S. 350, 367 (1970).

Opposition Brief — Nicklas v. Eagle

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2003

::csssessssseeeees 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Bank of Jackson County v. Cherry, 980 F.2d 1362 (llth Cir. 1993), cert. den., 510 U.S. 819, 114 S.Ct. 73, 126 L. … ¢ 24 CONCLUSION AND RELIEF For all of these reasons, Respondents request that the Petition be denied.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McCorvey v. Hill

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Scheb II, American Constitutional Law at 24 (3rd ed. 2003). * See Otis H. Stephens, Jr. and Joh M. … Brannon, 399 F. Supp. 133, 147 (M.D.N.C. 1975). “Each state has an interest in protecting the health and the physical and mental well-being of her citizens. ...

Opposition Brief — Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Bailey

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2000

Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., A486 U.S. 399 (1988) .....--2 eee e ee eeeeees 2, 6,8 Livadas v. Bradshaw, 512 U.S. 107 he) ee y Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. … Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 408-09 (1988).

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Penny Clarkston, Petitioner v. Whole Woman's Health, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 21, 2021

APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT CONDITIONAL CROSS-PETITION HEATHER GEBELIN HACKER Counsel of Record HACKER STEPHENS LLP 108 Wild Basin Rd., Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 heather@hackerstephens.com (512) 399 … South, Suite 250 Austin, Texas 78746 heather@hackerstephens.com (512) 399-3022 OCTOBER 2021

Respondents Brief — Lion Raisins, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Karen Ross

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Apr 4, 2022

Kolodziejski 399 U.S. 204 (1970) .............................................. 14 Fumarolo v. … Lyons, 24 Cal. 4th 468 (2000). Both acts provide for the adoption of “marketing orders,” a form of regulation of producers or handlers of particular commodities. Cal. Food & Agric.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Joshua Coleman, Petitioner v. Louisiana

Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jan 19, 2021

Jenson, 462 F.3d 399 (5th Cir. 2006) ..........................................................................9 United States v. … Ellis, 2019-0634 (La. 9/24/19), 279 So.3d 901 (deputy lacked reasonable suspicion to justify continued investigation to await female deputy for pat-down of defendant).

Opposition Brief — Johnson & Johnson, et al., Petitioners v. California

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 17, 2023

Pennsylvania 382 U.S. 399 (1966) ................................................ 16 Gormley v. Gonzalez 84 Cal. … Pet. 24; see id. at 22-29.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Okello T. Chatrie, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 9, 2026

Smith, 110 F.4th 817 (5th Cir. 2024) ...................... 2, 22-24 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. … The same is 24 true for digital searches.

Respondents Brief — Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al., Petitioners v. Democratic National Committee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jan 13, 2021

JA623-24. … Br. 21-24; see also ARP Br. 29-30; Brnovich Br. 24, 32.

UNITED STATES TAX COURT

Agency decision · Agency decision

Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399 (2000), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001). In Guill v. … Commissioner, 114 T.C. 399, 407 (2000) (quoting Alexander v. Commissioner, 72 F.3d at 946), affd. 259 F.3d 881 (7th Cir. 2001).

Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Hertz Corp. v. Cox

Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973

Co. of Baltimore, et al., 208 Ill. 275, 70 N E 399 _______.____._____-__--------- 4 II Diza A. v. Patterson, 263 U. S. 399, 68 L. ed. 356 (1923), 44S Ct 151 11 Erie Railroad Company v. … Crowe, underwent brain sur- gery at Emory University Hospital on Mrch 24, 1966, and is neither physically nor mentally able to give an affi- davit for use herein at this time.

Petitioners Brief — Bernal v. Fainter

Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1984

Hurley, 366 U.S. 117, 123-24 (1961). … United States, 350 U.S. 399, 405 (1956). In addition, people do not become “officials of government by virtue of being lawyers.” Id. at 729.

Opposition Brief — Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ v. Federal Communications Commission

Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1988

F.C.C., 399 F.2d 65 SE Mitty: AIEEE einhisistiansainanpasuclbcdgtrindadcanasaseuiaancsaunen 26,27 Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 (1954) ................ 16 Buckley v. … United States, 238 F.2d 584, 587 (4th Cir. 1956), (Cable service is ‘“‘a mere adjunct of the television receiving sets with which it was connected ...”’). 24 tem, Inc. v.

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — American Well & Prospecting Co. v. Commissioner

Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1956

Commissioner, 179 F. 2d 399 (5th Cir. 1950) affirming 12 T. C. 197 (1949) .... 8 United States v. Kingman, 170 F. 2d 408 (Sth Cir. … Commissioner of Internal Revenue accepted that finding in his brief which he tiled with the Court of Appeals and incorporated it in his statement of the question involved on the appeal pursuant to Rule 24