Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.90s
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 25, 2009
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 48857Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 4, 1995
The intended effect of this revision is to clarify certain provisions and ensure consistency with requirements of the Clean Air Act. … EPA is approving the amendments of rules 15A NCAC 2D .0501, .0516, and .0530 because these revisions are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act and EPA guidance.
60 FR 51923Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 1999
The plan revision was submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 59648Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Apr 24, 2015
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CASAC was established pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1977, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7409(d)(2), to review air quality criteria and NAAQS and recommend … Section 109(d)(1) of the CAA requires that the Agency periodically review and revise, as appropriate, the air quality criteria and the NAAQS for the six “criteria” air pollutants, including oxides of nitrogen
80 FR 22993Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 6, 2018
During this period, EPA received a comment from one commenter. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
83 FR 14762Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 21, 2000
On December 19, 1995, according to sections 111 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (Act), the EPA published the current form of the EGs applicable to existing MWCs. … Air Act.
65 FR 21354Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 14, 2013
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 18, 2013. … Air Act].”
78 FR 10583Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: SC
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 21, 2001
A total of one comment letter was received during the public comment period for the proposed Plan approval, which ended on June 6, 2001. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 48564Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations; Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2011
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (“the Act”). … Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to establish requirements to control air pollution from OCS sources located within 25 miles
76 FR 15898Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Dec 6, 2012
California's PERP Authorization Request In a letter dated December 5, 2008, CARB submitted to EPA its request pursuant to section 209 of the Clean Air Act (“CAA” or “the Act”), regarding its Portable … Air Act] § 209 preemption.
77 FR 72851Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 4, 1994
This action is based upon a revision request which was submitted by the State to satisfy the requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act), as amended November 15, 1990, and the Photochemical Assessment Monitoring … The EPA has reviewed this request for revision of the federally- approved SIP for conformance with the provisions of the Clean Air Act Amendments.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 6, 1999
Air Act section 173(c)(1). … period.
64 FR 42892Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 2, 2014
Proposed Action and Request for Public Comment Pursuant to section 107(d)(3) of the Clean Air Act and based on our evaluation of air quality data, our review of the Governor's recommendation, and our … Air Act planning purposes and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act.
79 FR 25077Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 4, 2002
We are proposing to approve the local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990. DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 5, 2002. … Anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time, as we do not plan to open a second comment period. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
67 FR 38453Environmental Protection AgencyProtection of Stratospheric Ozone: Proposal to Extend the Existing Reclamation Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 1, 1996
. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: Through this action EPA is proposing to amend the Clean Air Act section 608 refrigerant recycling regulations to extend … If a public hearing is held, the comment period will be extended until December 16, 1996. ADDRESSES: Comments and materials supporting this rulemaking are contained in Public Docket No.
61 FR 56493Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Notice of Reconsideration
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 21, 2011
Therefore, we believe that reconsideration is appropriate under section 307(d)(7)(B) of the Clean Air Act. … While we have taken final action on the rules identified above, and believe that the final rules reflect reasonable approaches consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, some of the issues
76 FR 15266Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 3, 1999
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone, and (iii) are consistent with Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements. … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period.
64 FR 59625Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 10, 2022
The public comment period for the NPRM closed on May 6, 2022. EPA received no public comments on the NPRM. 1 Both SIP submittals can be found in Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 35423Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 26, 2024
Plan (SIP) revisions required by the Clean Air Act (CAA) in a timely manner to address the EPA's 2015 findings of substantial inadequacy and “SIP calls” for provisions applying to excess emissions during … ruddick.randall@epa.gov Washington—Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC); Washington—Southwest Clean Air Agency (SWCAA). II. Why is the EPA issuing this proposed rule?
89 FR 93243Environmental Protection AgencyAnnouncement of Availability for Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard Review
Federal Register · Notice · Jun 17, 2008
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. B. … Background Under section 108(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator identifies and lists certain pollutants which “cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to
73 FR 34294Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.