Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

1,016 results

0.17s

  • Oral argument — Wharton v. Superintendent Graterford SCI

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2023

    It is our position he would have violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act. … That's when we had a full airing of everything that the district attorney did and why they did it. So it's not a matter of pre-amendment rules.

    84 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Chabot

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2015

    And this is the same court that was basically commenting on the fact that it's unconstitutional to require the filing of a gambling report. … There's an extended period over civil with this area, and this is coming out of the Criminal Enforcement Division. This summons doesn't come out...

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Kline v. Masfield

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    Mansfield, for a period of five years, was grooming Heather to end up being his ultimate sexual victim, which occurred in the latter part of her seventh grade year. … Joseph Podasik, who was the principal during the relevant time period. It was interesting to me, Judge Fischer, that you began your discussion with Mr.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lichtenstein v. Universityof Pittsburgh

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2012

    It's a lengthy period of time. In fact, about a year or two. 24 months. 24 months. Okay, I'm sorry. I see what you're saying. … So we have the judge putting comments on the government, we have the state government putting comments on the court, with my client staying in prison for seven years asking for the hearing.

    69 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Stanley

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 12, 2018

    If your Honor is referring to the district court's comments during the sentencing transcript, at sentencing the court mentions the use of force as a reason for denying Mr. … Point two, you can violate the Mann Act which are the offenses of conviction here using coercion and not using coercion. In this particular case he violated the Mann Act using coercion.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 20-3480_Du Pont Specialty Products v. NLRB

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021

    This is simply a question of is this a term and condition of employment within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act? … ALJ made some rough comments about the credibility of some of the witnesses and also made some pronouncements about whether a safety concern was really the motivator or if it was the after-the-fact sort

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Martin v. US Marshals Service

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016

    , and no Tort Claims Act notice was ever filed here, nor was there ever an application to file a late Tort Claims Act notice. … That certainly wasn't the total period of time that he interviewed them. The interviews were about 11 and 8 minutes respectively.

    47 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Fink

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015

    That is the comment in the guidelines that applies. And we have to take into consideration what it's doing in this case. Absolutely. … Judge Roth made the point those contracts that Snoop Dogg products got here would have went to the American who was acting as the old credo the sham DBE.

    37 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Groff v. De Joy

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2022

    So I'm wondering if you could comment on that, whether we should accept his view as opposed to the Postal Service? … Can I ask you, sir, over a period of I think it was two years, Mr.

    78 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Eastwick College

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2016

    It's a False Claims Act case. And she, in that opinion, essentially said the Third Circuit was aligning itself with the more liberal circuits in terms of False Claims Act particularity. … It says he acted with intent. It doesn't say who was paid, and nothing of the EDFC district court rule for what.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Wilson v. Beard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

    If someone is being paid periodically, or is getting favors periodically, as an informant, there is an implication that the informant may want to maintain that relationship and will testify to please whoever … We have basically comments to the judge, informal comments after the prosecution has already rested at the end of the second day of trial, before the defense is about to come in.

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Doe

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2015

    rather than reckless acts? … With respect to Judge Ambrose's comment a few moments ago about a Supreme Court decision, there is the Barons v.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. The CHUBBInstitute

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 28, 2011

    Salary is fixed income over a period of time for services rendered. So on its face, you wouldn't think salary to be included within the statute. … I would like to address a separate issue to the Chubb Corporation, but first I just wanted to comment briefly on two questions Your Honor has asked my co-counsel.

    116 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Anthony.Falco.Dawn Zimmer

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

    And the allegation that he commented on this, it's clearly within his job duties and functions. … So I wanted to comment on that. Again, Circuit in Brennan v. Norton, 380 F. 3rd, 399, said that retaliatory acts must be viewed cumulatively or in the aggregate. And here's a quote.

    51 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Adair

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2021

    Application note six was amended in 2013 in light of the Protect Act. … Yes, Your Honor, I just have two very brief comments.

    56 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Easter

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2020

    Well, they read the as-if language as limiting the court to the period of time when the offense occurred. And why is that wrong? To be saying it's wrong. How'd they get it wrong? … We've got that and we'll let Pastor comment that somebody in their 40s is an old man. All right. Thanks. We've got the matter under consideration.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Jabateh

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2020

    If he was asked, have you ever committed any act of genocide or brutality, et cetera, et cetera. … But again, it would seem that the typical case would be you would sentence a person to X period of time here, remove that person to in this case Liberia.

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Penn National Mutual v. New England Reinsurance

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2019

    And these are reinsurance treaties spanning a period of years and also layers. Yeah, I've always thought of them as sort of a hedge, if you will, reinsurance agreements. … I just have a few comments.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Brian J.Stone,etal. v. Todd A.Martin,etal.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2017

    Judge, according to the defendants, the deputy went to that property four times over a 10-day period. And on the fourth time, only the last time did he go around the gate. … Right, and I think the McCauley district court also commented on that.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Victory v. Berks County

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2019

    I recognize that that's what the Prison Litigation Reform Act and that questions whether or not that particular order is moot. Oh, it's gone. It's gone. That's what the act says, right? Why? … I also just wanted to comment on one – I apologize. Go ahead and make your comment, and then I'll stop.

    63 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.