Documents

Oral argument — American Acceptance Corporation of SC v. John Gietz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2025

And Judge Floyd, I would like to touch on your qualified immunity comment, because I believe you're absolutely right. … Travel Peace, the court cites to a case, probably from 1870, somewhere in that range, saying that seizure is an act, not an ongoing process, that we concede, as we must, of course, that a lawful seizure

Oral argument — Group Home on Gibson Island, LLC v. Gibson Island Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2025

And then the retaliation, you've already heard some comments about that. But it seems to me this case should be a straightforward assessment of the accommodation request under our analysis. … They will have won, Your Honor, for a period of two to three years. Now is the time for bold action. We are at possibly the lowest point in decades for people who struggle with disabilities.

Oral argument — Brooke Somers v. Anthony Devine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2025

May I make one last comment and I'll sit down? I know I'm out of time. No, I'd like to know, what was the thing that you attempted to say you disagreed with something? I'd like to know. … I would never act that way, Your Honor. Thank you. OK. We thank you. Appreciate your arguments. And we will adjourn court and come down and read counsel.

Oral argument — Martin Smiley v. Anshu Bhatnagar

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

We do allege in the complaint that he acted with a fraudulent intent when he made those misrepresentations. That's a rather conclusory allegation. … For the period of three years, Botninger would not cause M-Phase to engage in any sort of financing transactions.

Oral argument — Brian Davison v. Deborah Rose

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2021

He raised issues under the various federal statutes over a period of time that culminated in the fall of 2015 with the issuance to him of three letters, starting on September 29th, follow up on October … He likes to get people's attention by talking really loud, getting confrontational, acting in the behavior.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Joya Parada

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2025

And she flat out said, I just don't focus a lot, I lose focus a lot, and, quote, it's a lot tough to remain focused for a long period of time. … The Sixth Circuit in Enri Rodriguez held that an employer's comments about an employee's accents are direct evidence of national origin discrimination. And the same goes here.

Oral argument — United States v. Justin Wilson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2020

Wilson, acted with the intent to kill or inflict serious bodily harm when he stole the truck. As a result, this court should vacate Mr. … Um, the district court even commented directly on the use of the firearm. And again, uh, I'm I'm not gonna concede that he knew the farm was unloaded.

Oral argument — Estate of Najee Ali Baker v. Wake Forest University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

Now, there was a short time period, sure, but that's because Wake Forest quickly abandoned that plan and moved to its one officer plan. … Under our decisional law, an innkeeper or other occupier of property is not the insurer of the personal safety of the business invitees, period.

Oral argument — Curtis Evans v. PlusOne Sports, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017

It's a comment that's taught to first-year accounting students all the time. What does gross sales mean versus profits? Okay. And this has a commonly understood term. … In Garrity, misuse was found because the acts violated 19 state laws.

Oral argument — Edd Potter Coal Company, Inc. v. DOWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2022

Well, I think your comments are well taken because they help to remind us that there is a human being at the end of this line. … The Black Lung Act is part of the Mine Safety and Health Act. The Mine Safety and Health Act was written in an act at the same time.

Oral argument — Ellenor Zinski v. Liberty University, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2026

The plan was to work through the probation period and then tell Liberty, although Zinski admits that the plan was revealed to some co-workers. … To return to some of Judge Winn's other comments, the Supreme Court could have ruled on such a right in previous cases.

Oral argument — AFSCME Maryland Council 3 v. State of Maryland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2023

It was a defined benefit for a defined period of time. We have a very different situation here. As the Maryland Attorney General points out, this isn't a defined benefit case. … Say this was all prefaced by charitable act.

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Navarro-Cervellon

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2023

So the only way to interpret her comment. She doesn't have to go back and read the transcripts when she presided. This is a trial that she presided over, heard every word, and she said that. … She's talking about the light and most favorable to the government, and she then says the reasonable juror standard to come to a finding of guilt period, and as to the three counts.

Oral argument — Kathy Livingston v. Nicholas Kehagias

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2019

John Livingston resisted for a period of at least five minutes. … And I'll end my comments, if I may, by pointing out some very important factual distinctions on this taser point. Can I ask you a question? Yes, ma'am. Well, go ahead.

Oral argument — Zee Company, Inc. v. Williams Mullen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2013

Barrett's comment, that we're going to be seeing a lot of one another with multi-track depositions and so forth over the next several days or weeks. … He found, as I understand it, that he made a distinction between the comment made by the GE attorney and- Ms. Cundiff. Yes, Ms. Cundiff, and the walkaway offer notion.

Oral argument — PSEG Renewable Transmission LLC v. Arentz Family, LP

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2026

We don't need to just sort of hypothesize completely because we have experience with periodic blackouts and what that means to people's livelihoods down the line. … You probably are fine just drawing it out, but can you comment on that?

Oral argument — S. M. v. Dorel Juvenile Group Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 29, 2013

Let me make a comment to that. … The answer, Your Honor, is that you do give the court deference because if the court would have simply, without explanation, ruled, I think this evidence is relevant, period.

Oral argument — Renee Pryor v. United Air Lines, Incorporated

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2015

In this particular case, we do have acts that arise to the level of death threats, and I think that's where we take this matter into a different realm, and I'll reserve the rest of my comments for rebuttal … and I don't know that that matters but because it doesn't matter when you have a workforce and that's what I think that appellants are talking about the whole instance of the rumors spreading over a period

Oral argument — United States v. Eric Nji

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2025

These defendants met multiple times every single week over a long period of time, carrying on a function of trying to get weapons to Cameroon in a concealed fashion. They have bylaws. … And if I might just make two more points, Your Honor, in response to your comment. First of all, it wasn't all of the firearms. There were a few firearms that did not have obliterated serial numbers.

Oral argument — Alex Zalaya Orellana v. Pamela Bondi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 20, 2025

If he got into trouble during the relevant period of time. The question isn't whether he got into trouble three months after the court was notified that the visa was available. … Under that circumstance, then there would be no consideration of this later criminal act? No. Okay. Okay. I think we understand.