Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Opposition Brief — Smalls v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991
Richardson, 397 U.S. 759 (1970)...0000000...... 5,6 Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61 (1975)........................ 5 Shapiro v. United States, 335 U.S. 1 (1948).....00000000... 6 Tollett v. … New York, 423 U.S. 61 (1975), peti- tioner asserts that his challenge is not) barred because it goes to the very power of the government to bring him into court.
502 U.S. 1003Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1973
New York, 293 U.S. 52, 55 8. Ct. 16, 79 L. cs tccctupinriariekerenhouwews 4,5 Natural Milk Producers Assn. v. Sam Francisco, 317 U.S. 423, 63 S. Ct. 359, 87 L. … Ed. 808 (1919) ; nyo a. a L. 441 (1917) neh Mh Site den 0 Gn. em cisco, 317 U.S. 423, 63 S. Ct. 359, 87 L. Ed. 375 (1942); Doremus v. Board of Education, 342 US. 429, 72 S. Ct. 394, 96 L.
409 U.S. 1109Federal Register · Notice · Feb 4, 2015
Abstract NTIA proposes to add 61 questions to the U.S. … The U.S. government has an increasingly pressing need for comprehensive broadband data. The U.S.
80 FR 6056Commerce DepartmentNational Telecommunications and Information AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · May 27, 2004
U.S. Agency for International Development Ms. Deborah Lewis, (202) 712-0936 www.usaid.gov . U.S. Agency for International Development (OIG) Mr. … U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Ms. Tina Louise Martin, (202) 376-8364 www.usccr.gov . U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Mr.
69 FR 30341Management and Budget OfficeFederal Register · Notice · Jun 1, 2005
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey at (202) 482-3964 or Addilyn Chams-Eddine at (202) 482-0648, AD/CVD Operations, Office 6, Import Administration, U.S. … The Department will issue appropriate assessment instructions directly to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) within 15 days of publication of this notice.
70 FR 31425Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationReply Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1992
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), this temporary taking suffices to defeat any assertion that a State’s regu- lation did not ripen, for purposes of justifiability, into a compensable action … See First English, 482 U.S. at 311-12. Mr. Lucas’s case is in precisely the same posture as that of the petitioner in First English.
505 U.S. 1003Federal Register · Notice · Mar 17, 2008
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5604 and (202) 482-0649, respectively. … Mexinox further notes it paid antidumping duty cash deposits on this material without a sale having been made to an unaffiliated U.S. customer.
73 FR 14215Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jan 2, 2025
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zachary Shaykin at (202) 482-2638 (India); Laurel Smalley at (202) 482-3456 (the People's Republic of China (China)), AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International … Trade Administration, U.S.
90 FR 84Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationMinority Business Enterprises Advisory Council Meeting
Federal Register · Notice · Oct 3, 2024
Hill, primary Designated Federal Officer (DFO), Minority Business Development Agency, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-4826; email: Jhill@mbda.gov . … Hill, at (202) 482-4826, or Jhill@mbda.gov, at least five (5) days before the meeting date. Copies of the MBEAC meeting minutes will be available to the public upon request.
89 FR 80540Commerce DepartmentMinority Business Development AgencySilicon Metal from Brazil: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 2, 2005
If the case is not appealed, or if it is affirmed on appeal, the Department will instruct U.S. … Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4114, fax: (202) 482-5105.
70 FR 66349Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationFederal Register · Notice · Jun 25, 2004
Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0656 or (202) 482-3874, respectively. … In accordance with section 736(a)(2) of the Act, the Department will instruct U.S.
69 FR 35583Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPorcelain-On-Steel Cooking Ware: Recission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Federal Register · Notice · Mar 28, 2001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Terpstra or Geoffrey Craig, Office of AD/CVD Enforcement VI, Group II, Import Administration, U.S. … Department of Commerce, Room 4012, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3965, or (202) 482-4161, respectively.
66 FR 16904Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPolychloroprene Rubber From Japan: Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 23, 1999
Department 0of Commence, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-0989 or 482-3814, respectively. … The Department independently confirmed with the U.S. Customs Service that there were no shipments from Tosoh during the POR.
64 FR 39971Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Hieu Minh Le, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 23, 2023
Burger, 482 U.S. 691, 699–700 (1987) (citing Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 361 (1967) (Harlan, J., concurring). … Burger, 482 U.S. at 711–12.
Reply Brief — M. L. B. v. S. L. J. (No. 95-853)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1996
Illinois, 351 U.S. 12 (1956), and Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371 (1971). … Ortwein, 410 U.S. at 659.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1992
Wot ae ee or Sutycm Cowt, U.S. rILED | t No. 91-453 [eo re IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term, 1991 David H. … Los Angeles, 482 US 304 (1987) ........ 19 Florida Rock Indus. v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. i. SPeeerre rT errr Tee re 5, 17, 20 vi Gibson v.
505 U.S. 1003Opposition Brief — Campo v. Electro-Coal Transfer Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1992
at 423. Further, by use of the word “including” in Section 902(3), ‘Congress indicated that the specifically mentioned occupations are not exclusive.” /d. at 423 n.9 (citing P.C. … Gray, 470 U.S. 414, 423, n.9, 105 S.Ct. 1421, 1427, n.9, 84 L.Ed.2d 406 (1985); P.C. Pfeiffer Co. v. Ford, 444 U.S. 69, 77-78, n. 7, 100 S.Ct. 328, 334, n. 7, 62 L.Ed.2d 225 (1979). ...
502 U.S. 1025Appendix — Randall v. Loftsgaarden
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1986
American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 225 (Sth Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976). … American Investment Co., 523 F.2d 220, 226 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1054 (1976).
478 U.S. 647Federal Register · Notice · Jun 27, 2023
Crespo (India) at (202) 482-3693; Dan Alexander (Malaysia) at (202) 482-4313; Whitley Herndon (Portugal) at (202) 482-6274; Brittany Bauer (Taiwan) at (202) 482-3860; Magd Zalok (the Republic of Turkey … (Turkey)) at (202) 482-4162; and Myrna Lobo (the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (Vietnam)) at (202) 482-2371, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
88 FR 41589Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationBrief Amicus Curiae — Richardson v. Belcher
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1971
Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 641-42, 89 Sup. Ct. 1322, 1335 (1969) (District of Columbia welfare benefits withheld in violation of | Due Process Clause); Schneider v. Rusk, 377 U.S. 163, 168, 84 Sup. … Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499, 74 Sup. Ct. 693, 694 (1954) (same). Cf. Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S..254, 90 Sup. Ct. 1011, 1017 (1970) (welfare benefits as “‘property”).
404 U.S. 78
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.